About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh Uses Hu's Visit to Mock Chinese Culture

January 19, 2011 6:44 pm ET — 88 Comments

Rush Limbaugh used Chinese President Hu Jintao's state visit to the U.S. as an opportunity to mock Chinese culture, including the sound of Hu's speech, and suggested that "everybody's going to be hungry a half-hour after" the state dinner for the Chinese delegation.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Limbaugh: Chinese "Sounds Like All The Same Word"

Limbaugh Mocks Chinese President's Untranslated Speech. From Limbaugh's January 19 radio show:

LIMBAUGH: Eh, never mind. We're not gonna gyp Fox. I wanted to gyp it because the -- well, the -- Hu Jintao, he was speaking, and they weren't translating. They -- they, normally -- you have some translator every couple of words. But Hu Jintao was just going [mocking Chinese speech].

Nobody was translating. But that's the closest I can get. [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 1/19/10]

Limbaugh Says He Tried To Transcribe Chinese President's Remarks "Phonetically," Again Mocks Chinese Speech. From Limbaugh's radio show:

LIMBAUGH: Hi, and welcome back. Rush Limbaugh.

I have to admit I'm amused by this. Probably very few other people are, but I am. During our obscene profit timeout, I'm watching the news conference between President Obama and Chinese ChiCom leader Hu Jintao, and I've not seen this before. Hu Jintao is speaking, speaking and speaking with no translator. They wait till he finishes, and then they read what he said in toto.

And of course, we don't know. The translator could be making it all up. Hu Jintao could be -- he could be telling us -- who knows what he could be saying to us? The translator is saying [speaks with accent]: "We want to work together, two countries in the world. China is developing country. America, developed country -- but not for long."

He didn't say that. But I'm fascinated. I'm listening to this -- I found myself trying to write down what Hu Jintao was saying in Chinese. Phonetically, so I could repeat it to you.

Well, it's a -- it looks like chicken scrawls. I said, "I wonder what -- I wonder to people who can't speak English, what does it sound like to them?" Because when I hear Chinese or Japanese, it sounds like all the same word. And I can't - I can't comprehend of anybody understanding it. But of course, that's silly. But he's sitting there, [mocks Chinese speech].

And I couldn't write down anymore. I was losing track of -- because I'm looking up as he's saying all this, and they cut to Obama looking intently as though he understands every word of it, which -- what would you expect from the - from the  ruling class? [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 1/19/10]

Limbaugh: "Real Question" About State Dinner For China Is "Whether Everybody's Going To Be Hungry A Half-Hour After They Eat." From Limbaugh's radio show:

LIMBAUGH: By the way, just to be clear, folks, still not certain here whether Harry Reid meant his comment about the ChiComs being a dictatorship in a derogatory or complimentary way. I mean, China is an authoritarian, collectivist dictatorship, but we don't know that Dingy Harry would necessarily find any fault with that. He seems to be in support of that kind of -- and we certainly know Thomas L. Friedman of The New York Times love the authoritarianism of the ChiComs. He says when the ruling elite of the right people meets democracy -- hands down, it's the only way you're really going to get things done. Thomas L. Friedman of The New York Times.

The real question about this state dinner tonight is that whether everyone's going to be hungry a half-hour after they eat, but I don't know that we'll get any news on that. [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 1/19/10]

Limbaugh Uses China's Visit To Fearmonger About Obama Administration

Limbaugh On Obama's Comment That China's Political System Is "Very Different" From Ours: "Yeah, Maybe -- But Not For Long." On his radio show, Limbaugh said of the press conference:

LIMBAUGH: Obama's up there telling the press corps that China has a very different political system than we do. Yeah, maybe -- but not for long. [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 1/19/10]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by southerngal (January 19, 2011 6:53 pm ET)
      8 23
      Oh for pete's sake, it's a joke. They are made of every culture and ethnicity and have been forever. Good grief.

      This post should dovetail quite nicely with the one about Beck complaining about the dangers of political correctness. Maybe he's right.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jjamele2880 (January 19, 2011 7:04 pm ET)
        19 5
        This site clearly annoys the hell out of you. We'll all understand if you leave and never come back. In fact, I'll take the blame for the loss personally.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2jj (January 22, 2011 2:22 am ET)
          5 1
          That bugs them because it is the truth. All Rush et al have done is make themselves look like a bunch of uneducated bigots. It is amazing just how silly they are. But in the end, Obama is not the first to maintain relationships with China and he will not be the last. But never expect these louts to be fair about Obama. It is still driving them nuts that this black dud is our President and mostly, because he is a successful President after you know who!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (January 19, 2011 8:14 pm ET)
        18 3
        There is a difference between political correctness and refusal to open oneself to the world. If it all sounds the same to Rush, perhaps he should learn Chinese to understand people (and his enemies) better.

        But that's not his modus operandi, is it?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Meremark (January 20, 2011 11:26 am ET)
          3  
          -

          It all does sound the same to drugged-deaf Rush ... the interior sound of malevolence.

          The sound of sponsors who step away from his hate cage.

          He mocks the Moon for its mirth melody.

          Rush was born under a Bad Sign, defective. Humankind may hope he defects from our world to Mars.

          -
          Report Abuse
        • Author by fvrnite7537 (January 20, 2011 4:42 pm ET)
          2  
          Limbaugh is not one for doing anything without some sort of mockery. Typical of bullies like him, if he can't criticize based on the facts, he tries childish mockery. To his uneducated ears ( whatever hearing is left nowadays) Chinese might as well be Klingon.

          The only language he understand is his own voice.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Maimon (January 19, 2011 10:34 pm ET)
        11 2
        I'm sure he tells the same jokes at the local "meeting" when he is dressed in his "Grand Cyclops" hood and robe.

        LMAO...Beck another bleeting idiot that suckers listeners.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Can O Whoopass (January 19, 2011 11:07 pm ET)
        9  
        Except Poor Rush is ignorant that the Red Chinese are ahead of the USA in computer sciences, green energy and energy-efficient bullets trains.
        Their economy is light-years ahead of the US's, too!
        Leave it to yor cave-apes to drag us beck to 1865, every time, Rust.

        Soon, North Korea will overtake America, since Repugs want us broke and begging.


        Report Abuse
      • Author by angels4light (January 20, 2011 8:29 am ET)
        8  
        Oh, good, RO, THERE you are!

        As for Mr. Limbaugh, well, yes, I guess he is trying to joke, but it is really just in poor taste.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fvrnite7537 (January 20, 2011 4:49 pm ET)
          3  
          Angel, Limbaugh IS poor taste. He's almost as bad as Savage in pretending he is educated but he does his sctick well enough that he suckers people to be " ditto heads".

          But then these same people think Glenn Beck is sane, so we're obviously not referring to discerning people here.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by smarish8368 (January 20, 2011 9:03 am ET)
        3  
        The LimpBag is a disgrace and an embarrassment to the United States. He should apologize to all Chinese and every other ethnic group he has 'made jokes' about. That is, before he is taken off the public airwaves into oblivion.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (January 20, 2011 11:30 am ET)
        4  
        I kind of agree with RightOn with this one. Nothing new or suprising here.

        The problem I have with Limbaugh's statements, is that's he's using shtick and jokes that we all got tired of while still in grade school.

        For once I have to say Limbaugh's only sin in this instance is being an unfunny, hack.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (January 20, 2011 11:33 am ET)
          1 1
          You're right. It's not funny. It's stupid. Limbaugh is a first class obnoxious idiot. But it's also much ado about nothing. Getting upset about something so silly as this just plays right into his playbook.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by OttoSmith (January 20, 2011 11:53 am ET)
          4
        I agree.. It was a joke! Who hasn't tried to talk Chinese.... come on!

        Is it that the Chinese do not have a sense of humor? or maybe people on this forum?

        Funny to see how upset everyone gets... Thanks for a good laugh!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DDB9000 (January 22, 2011 5:02 am ET)
          4  
          @OttoSmith

          I agree.. It was a joke! Who hasn't tried to talk Chinese.... come on!
          Is it that the Chinese do not have a sense of humor?


          Well, not everyone has tried to 'talk' Chinese - because they are really just trading on old tried and true racist stereotypes - just throw in a lot of words ending in 'ing' or 'eng' or 'chin', and voila, you're speaking 'Chinese'.

          The fact is that Chinese (in both it's major dialects) is very complex and only sounds simplistic to Western ears, especially because the tone of many 'words' changes its meaning. But I'm not here to teach you about that.

          As someone who knows (or has known) Chinese-speaking people from the mainland, Hong Kong, Singapore, the US & Canada, and Taiwan (from whence my best friend comes), I can assure you that they have very good senses of humour, but not over the kinds of racist claptrap that Rush and his friends spew (which is not funny, by the way). And as pointed out before, many Chinese (and more and more these days) speak very good English (Hu is from an older generation so likely doesn't). In fact, my Taiwanese friend speaks better English than many Americans I know, AND she also has much better comprehension of English (and likely more than Rush, but that's not hard).

          And if you need any further proof of how bigoted his rant is, you need only look at this part of Rush's comment...

          "I found myself trying to write down what Hu Jintao was saying in Chinese. Phonetically, so I could repeat it to you.
          Well, it's a -- it looks like chicken scrawls.."

          Notice he says 'phonetically' - which would mean he is writing it down in either international phonetics or (more likely) English (Romanised) phonetics. Why then would he not be able to read his own handwriting and why would it look like 'chicken scrawls'? That sounds more like what his idea of Chinese characters would be like than his own writing. Or does Rush write English in chicken scrawls? That could explain a lot.

          Sorry, but Rush is a huge bigot and it was not funny on any level.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by curiousindependent (January 20, 2011 12:22 pm ET)
        3  
        Glad to see you back, right ON, cute puppy. Did you have a good vacation? Honestly, given that the last time I saw you was the 7th and you were apparently vexed over an unauthorized use of quotation marks, I worried that you might have shaved your head and made a statement. Glad to see that I was wrong.

        :)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (January 20, 2011 12:31 pm ET)
            2
          Thank you! I vex and huff and puff and harumph over all sorts of grammatical flubs, but that quotation mark heresy did set me reeling and on the hunt for a head razor. In the immortal words of DellDolly "You nailed it!"

          So of course I had to wait a couple weeks until I had a little scalp stubble before posting, but it's growing like a weed now. And thanks again for caring. Muah!.....
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Festus (January 20, 2011 12:42 pm ET)
          4
        Saturday Night Live has made bank on this sort of humor since the good old days of Samurai Delicatessen, Two Wild and Crazy Guys and, didn't Chevy Chase use the "N" word to which Garrett Morris replied, "dead honky."?

        Then there's Archie Bunker.

        Remember: it's all entertainment.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Maimon (January 22, 2011 4:22 pm ET)
          1  
          Ahh you aren't saying that Rush is a Sketch Comedy show are you? Do you think that is what his followers think?

          And no, it is not entertainment for his listeners, it is Gospel.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (January 22, 2011 12:18 pm ET)
        2  
        Actually all Rush's insular statement did was make Rush look like a silly fool who is patently unable to understand that the differing languages and cultures are something to celebrate. But never expect Rush to make a sane, unbiased statement. Poor thing is just so insular that he is not up to the task. Psychologists state that Insult is the refuge of a totally silly person who is so incompetent that they resort to insult. Yep, that describes Rush alright.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (January 19, 2011 7:01 pm ET)
      7 1
      A word of advice to MR. Limppaw: "Don't go to China anytime soon."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (January 19, 2011 7:03 pm ET)
      5  
      Well, he's probably right that China's system is becoming more like ours. China right now is like the United States in the Gilded Age- factories are pouring pollutants into the water and air, workers have no rights and are basically living in slavery, and their economy is booming. The scary thing is that for a lot of political leaders, the answer to dealing with Chinese competition is to make our system more like China's- by deregulating. So yes, our systems are becoming more and more alike all the time. China is becoming more and more aggressively Capitalist, and our response is to do the same.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (January 19, 2011 11:18 pm ET)
        2 13
        Hmmm...

        No. China is nothing like the US in its rise and industrial expansion over the last century. The US didn't build its wealth or might on the backs of over 30 million of its dead citizens in democidal famine, forced labor camps, and gulags like China. Nice revisionist history there.

        So sit back and enjoy the backslapping, bows, and state dinner in honor of Pres Hu. Just remember that the Dalai Lama was ushered out by the trash so China wouldn't be "upset". The Israeli PM wasn't given a state bash.

        So cozy with communists we are now...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Maimon (January 20, 2011 12:42 am ET)
          17  
          -Yes...we never had slaves...oh wait yes we did.
          -Yes...we never had unsafe work places...oh wait yes we did.
          -Yes...we never had people imprisoned falsely...oh wait yes we did.
          -Yes..we never went to war falsely and killed...oh wait yes we did.
          -Yes we never had prisoners doing work...oh wait yes we did.

          Yeah we don't give Israel $5 billion+ annually for military aid?

          I guess the dinners for Y Shamir, Y Rabin, Ehud barrack, Ehud Olmert and all the other Israeli Pms never happened?

          Not mention using our Vetos in the U.N. Security council to prevent resolutions affecting Israel.

          You know that many in the Israelis leadership were considered "terrorists" originally , right? Yitzak Shamir was wanted by the British for involvement in hanging a Brithish Soldier? He was a member of teh Leh'i ( Stern Gang). And before say anything stupid...I lived/worked/consulted for the IDF and Shin-Bet.

          Yeah it wasn't Kissinger and Nixon who sought to better U.S./ Chinese realtions.

          I am so glad you are concerned about the Dalai Lama, Bush had 8 yeasr and did nothing...and suddenly you care. Do you even know what type of Buddhist the Dalai Lama is? And no cheating...

          Gulags are Soviet/ Russian prisons, not Chinese. I think you are very guilty of rivisionism. You should learn how to use the word before you go accusing people of it.

          Also, China, India and Brazil are the 3 countries we are trying to focus on because of their rising economic importance. The world has changed either keep up...or shut up.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 20, 2011 1:05 am ET)
            13  
            Don't expect any sort of rational response from DBoned Chicken. I've made the mistake of responding to his requests for info in the past, and he normally just disappears to drop the same crap on another thread.

            He's the definition of a time-waster troll.

            Oh, yeah, very nice job of politely and thoroughly serving him his azz. He gets a lot of that here.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Maimon (January 20, 2011 1:33 am ET)
              6  
              LMAO...Hey, I just get a kick out of this place. I find it funny and sad. It seem like if we directed all this "energy" into solutions rather than ideology. We would have colonized the Moon by now.

              I feel that true about alot of human pursuits.

              If we could get rid of lobbying we would move alot faster toward real solutions.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 20, 2011 9:00 am ET)
                6 1
                I don't even find this site to be so much about "ideology", more about truth and fiction. The nuts who come here to defend Beck and Limbaugh aren't conservatives, they're Republican cult members.

                I live in a pretty "conservative" area, and find myself having to bite my tongue in social and work situations, so I like to come here to do really outrageous things like asking right wingers to support their claims, or to point out that they're lying.

                I don't have to worry so much about the hurt feelings and sulking of the trolls here, as with people I need to get along with in real life.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Maimon (January 20, 2011 6:32 pm ET)
                  4  
                  I live in the Bible groin..I mean Texas. I grew up in Canada, then went to Israel to work in my field: I have a dual stream M.A. in Middle Eastern Studies. I have two areas of emphasis: Jewish and Islamic theology and the secondairy area of religion and terrorism.

                  I was in my field before it was "fashionable". Most of my friends were Soviet Studies, but that of course started collapsing while in university..LMAO... they all went into business.

                  I live in a very conservative area. They whorship Bush down here. He actually doesn't live that far from me.

                  I'm more about solutions. Those that are enslaved to dogma often sacrifice solutions for party belief.

                  I spent alot of year working against propaganda. I think it is why I dislike Fox so much. I see so many classic propaganda moves: say something to get the rise, then deny it. Claim to be the only dispenser of truth. Demonize your opponents. Take a fact and bend it. Make up facts and spread the meme.

                  Anyway, my wife loves that I do this..It means she doesn't have to hear me talk about politics and religion. She only has to listen the history and philosophy stuff now. LMAO...
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by CoolSlaw (January 20, 2011 11:39 am ET)
                4  
                It seem like if we directed all this "energy" into solutions rather than ideology. We would have colonized the Moon by now.


                I sure hope you aren't a supporter of the republican party saying this. Seems to me over the last few years the ONLY thing republicans have been interested in is obstruction and the politics of personal destruction.

                The republicans offer no real solutions other then, "taking our country back" and "Stopping the Obama agenda" or "being for the Constitution". Bumper sticker slogans and broad, sweeping, buzzword rhetoric DOES NOT constitute solutions.

                The democrats have been trying to make some positive change, and they've succeeded to some extent over the last few years despite the unprecedented lockstep obstruction by the GOP.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (January 20, 2011 12:40 pm ET)
                  3  
                  Tom Friedman said this morning that an autocracy like China can make more progress than we can because we have one party that wants progress and another that "continually puts a stick in the spokes" of the wheel of progress.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (January 20, 2011 12:53 pm ET)
              1 4
              Aw...it's so cute when mmfA's #1 cheerleader comes out to rabble-rouse the troops!

              You do look good in bobby socks sweetheart! ;)
              Report Abuse
          • Author by jjamele2880 (January 20, 2011 8:01 am ET)
            12  
            As a teacher with a Master's Degree in US History, I don't pay a whole lot of attention to Tbone's "umm no here's how it really was" posts.

            And just to head you trolls off at the pass- I don't pay a lot of attention to "oh you are a teacher that explains the sad state of American education" snarks, either. Go read a book.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Maimon (January 20, 2011 8:50 am ET)
              5  
              I love most teacher. Anyone iwlling to slug it out with other peoples kids deserves our support.

              Yes, it would be interesting to see Rush write hisory book. LMAO...
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 20, 2011 9:04 am ET)
              5 1
              Sure, jjamele, but you probably learned that history that leaves out the part about the United States being planted on Earth through Divine Providence, and having a record of perfect moral superiority.

              It's funny that some adults are so willing to buy the whitewashed version of the world, even funnier is the absolute confidence they have in coming here to lecture others about their fantasies.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jjamele2880 (January 20, 2011 4:20 pm ET)
                4  
                It comes from years of being told that Americans are the Best Most Generous Most Amazing Most Productive Awesomest People in the Whole Universe by pretty much everybody in authority. It always sounds like that line the POWs were brainwashed into bleating about their commander in The Manchurian Candidate.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Tbone Slickens (January 22, 2011 3:47 pm ET)
              1 2
              As a teacher with a Master's Degree in US History, I don't pay a whole lot of attention to...


              Let me guess. You don't pay a whole lot of attention to communist atrocities because it just doesn't fit the meme?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Maimon (January 22, 2011 4:31 pm ET)
                3  
                Ahhh not sure what you mean. The atrocities of all groups are taught where I'm from. I think the so called "left" owns up. The right likes to romanticize history. This idea that America has been this benevolent beacon of freedon and democracy is the real myth.

                -Ask someone who grew up in Haiti about the Duvaliers and how we let them run the country.
                -Ask someone who grew up under Saddam in Iraq what it was like. We funded him through the 1980's and never really questioned him or his practices.
                -Ask someone who lived under the Marcos regime what it was like.
                -Ask someone from central america what it was like.
                -Ask someone who lived in Chile in the 1980's what it was like.
                -Let's not forget all the "terrorist" groups we funded.
                -Let's not forget we backed Zia in Pakistan and used the ISI to fund Mujahadin in the 1980's.
                -Apartheid was also supported.

                I am perfectly willing to admit the negative side of the Left, maybe you should try to live with the not so pretty history of America, the right and its corporate masters.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by Tbone Slickens (January 20, 2011 12:51 pm ET)
            1 5
            While our slave owning past is deplorable especially to our modern sensibilities, to flippantly dismiss China's democide of over 30 million (probably closer to 50) of its own citizens and compare them to our misdeeds (a common tactic of the left) if very telling and a wrong-headed comparison. I mean really...prisoners doing work? God forbid.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by congero6189599 (January 20, 2011 1:39 pm ET)
              6  
              Wow so you dismiss the slave trade that brought over how many millions? How many died during the savage "Middle Passage?"Whole villages and peoples. Millions! How many died soon after their arrival or just after being used up in 7 yrs.after being sold down the river. How about the cotton,tobacco,sugar cane and other crops they were worked from sun-up to sun down to clear,plant and harvest? You don't think the money made fueled international trade? Fueled the growth of the textile industry and the rising merchants givng them a boost in the fight to overthrow fuedalistic rule. You deny the wealth created by the slaves in being instrumental to the development of modern capital not only here but around the world? A great debt is owed the African slaves for the part they played in the growth of capital. Need we talk about the chain-gang and the clearing of swamps by all prisoners but especially the newly freed slaves caught up in the defeat of reconstruction and the "black code" laws and Jim Crow discrimination. They created wealth never sharing in the rewards. The ugliness of the growth of this country you never want to admit.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jjamele2880 (January 20, 2011 4:22 pm ET)
                6 2
                The English Colonies and United States enslaving millions of people= ok.

                China enslaving even more= deplorable, not to be compared to the English colonies and the United States.

                Whatever, dope.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (January 21, 2011 2:00 am ET)
                  4 1
                  Thumbs up!!!
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by Maimon (January 21, 2011 11:27 pm ET)
                  5 1
                  You run with that ideolized version of America. LMAO...We have been the hegemonic power for less than 70 years. Empires come and go... talk to me once we have been near the top for 1000 years.

                  After trying to bankrupt the Soviets it turns out we are nearly bankrupt too. So let's fight some fake wars and wrap our selves in the Flag, drunk on dreams of yesterday that never really existed.

                  I think you have missed the point, you are the slave. They enslaved you with the lies you bought into...Now be a good little follower and turn on Fox news and drink it up.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by Old_Benjamin (January 20, 2011 1:47 pm ET)
              4  
              ...prisoners doing work? God forbid.


              Wait wait - are you saying you support forced prison labour?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by congero6189599 (January 20, 2011 1:55 pm ET)
                4  
                It appears that way. Get ready for child labor and minumum wage laws are unconstitutional too! Also too!
                Report Abuse
        • Author by curiousindependent (January 20, 2011 12:26 pm ET)
          5 1
          The US didn't build its wealth or might on the backs of over 30 million of its dead citizens
          What percentage of the Chinese population would that represent? And how much of a percentage of US population at the time died to unnecessary industrial accidents, pollutants, and unregulated industrial poisons?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by semiarid (January 22, 2011 2:01 pm ET)
          2 1
          I guess you don't know that the US robber baron capitalists built the transcontinental railroad and other US western railroad lines mostly by abusing Chinese immigrant laborers. The Chinese were given the most dangerous RR construction jobs for much lower pay, and once the railroads were built, sometimes the robber barons had them killed to avoid paying them. Does your definition of forced labor include murdering the Chinese workers instead of paying them?

          Mostly, though, the Chinese laborers were given the boot, but not until the work was done.

          So much for the good old fashioned conservative values of hypercapitalism that Beck, Limbaugh and Palin are so nostaligic for. Their "conservative base" are useful idiots, lapping up right wing propaganda and thoughtlessly voting the Republican pro-corporate ticket. And you? are you paid to post nonsense and revisionist history? Project much? Shame on you! Go back to school.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by bumperboo (January 19, 2011 7:08 pm ET)
         
      Oh gaud- would someone please take Limbaugh off the air?!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Nihilist (January 19, 2011 7:23 pm ET)
      10 1
      yeah lets drag out the old charlie chan movies, played by a Scottish actor with bad makeup....

      el blimpo will burst one day.... the law of physics demand it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (January 20, 2011 11:44 am ET)
        2  
        We can also drag out the painfully bad "Castle of Fu Manchu", where the Chinese supervillian is played by Christopher Lee.

        I recommend watching the Mystery Science Theater 3000 version.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 19, 2011 7:57 pm ET)
      13 3
      The Ugly American...really, really ugly American.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Ratu01 (January 22, 2011 8:01 am ET)
        1  
        He is not really, he wanted America to fail, cheered when Chicago lost the bid to host olympics, was angry when US president won the Noble prize - he hates America.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Maimon (January 19, 2011 10:33 pm ET)
      9  
      I forgot Rush was an expert on Chinese history and culture. I recall when he met Mao and helped negotiate a "raproachment", and all this time I thought it had been Kissenger.

      I also remember the time he helped difuse tensions in Paris so we could negotiate with the Norht in Vietnam.

      Didn't he help in Sinai when he told the joke of two jews and an Egyptian in a bar?

      Rush is the greatest example of "ignorance is strength". His listeners are empty headed, white trash that hide behind the flag.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 19, 2011 11:51 pm ET)
        7 1
        Not only empty-headed white trash, but stuck in about 1950. Rush seems to be losing his mind very rapidly in full view of the public.

        WTF is the idea behind "transcribing phonetically" a foreign language ? At first I thought maybe he was poking fun at his own stupidity, but then I remembered that he isn't smart enough to see what an idiot he is.

        Is his audience so enamored of this blob of dullness that they actually think he could figure out Chinese by writing down the sounds he hears ? I seriously cannot understand any adult wanting to listen to his show for any other reason than to sadistically laugh at a washed up old bigot slowly deteriorating over the airwaves.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Maimon (January 20, 2011 12:24 am ET)
          9 1
          LMAO...Andy his listeners have a physical age of 40, but a mental age of 10.

          Sadly, this is what America is coming to in many parts. People come up to me in Texas and go," Did you hear...Obama spent $200 million a day on his trip to India"...LMAO

          I usually follow it with," Weren't you abducted by aliens?" To which I get a vigarous affirmative nod.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 20, 2011 12:52 am ET)
            9 1
            ...his listeners have a physical age of 40...


            Oh, come on, those must be the Ditto-Cadets. His audience has to average around 80. I'm pushing 50, and when I hear the callers to his show, I feel like I'm eavesdropping on my grandparents.

            Maybe it's all in the head. I think the right wing brain, with its tendency toward fear and the status quo, goes into a premature senility. Some of them might be 40 according to their drivers license, but the skull-meat is already in the complaining and double-locking-the-doors years.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by LiberalEagle422 (January 20, 2011 8:22 am ET)
              10 1
              oh Limbaugh. If only I could have been college drop out and draft dodger due to a cyst in my a$$. I'd have a hate radio show too!

              Let's see what are some of Rush's other fine hallmark moments...

              -pointing out how Michael J. Fox was faking his parkinson's disease

              -There's always the "Barack the Magic Negro" comment

              -Calling soldiers who criticized the Iraqi war "phony soldiers"

              -who could forget the immortal line "Feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society." (cause Rush is one to talk about unattractiveness amirite? What a hottie!)

              I mean the list could go on and on and on and on....

              More people need to be exposed to THE WHOLE PICTURE rather than his heated rhetoric. But then again... if people are stupid enough to listen to him without questioning then there's probably not too much hope for them in the first place...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 20, 2011 9:08 am ET)
                6 1
                And every one of those highlights can be explained ( and have been, at this site) by his unquestioning sheep as either "satire", "media tweaks", or as sophisticated humor or commentary that can only be understood through hundreds of hours of immersion in the Excrement in Broadcasting sensory deprivation pod.

                Rush has the easiest job in the world.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by LiberalEagle422 (January 20, 2011 9:58 am ET)
                  4 1
                  it's sad innit? there's always going to be wolves who take advantage of the sheep. You'd figure in this day and age with technology assaulting sheep on everyside they'd at least be able to figure it out.

                  But see this is why conservative though should eventually give way. I mean, the Catholic Church in the dark ages were able to keep such a strangle hold on things because they were the only ones left with books really, once the Roman Empire fell. Information was near impossible to get outside the church.

                  In today's day and age, the internet (check your sources of course) makes it almost near impossible NOT to find information on ANYTHING. Now it's just a race against time of either the sheep figuring out how to work the thing or them getting old and dying. Generally speaking of course, it's easier for young'uns to be more sauvy when it comes to the internet AND learning in general. Put 2 and 2 together and eventually you should have a more informed future generation. I hope I'm not being too idealistic in that sense.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Andy Kreiss (January 20, 2011 10:10 am ET)
                    6 1
                    I think you've nailed it with the "getting old and dying" part. From my experience, if people are still drinking the right wing Kool Aid past the age of 50, there's very little chance of them getting clean.

                    If the GOP doesn't steer themselves back to reality in the next decade or so, they're going to face extinction.

                    That's pretty scary to people, the possibility that everything they know is wrong, and trying to fix the situation in their later years.

                    I know enough people in this group that prove it. No new information, no amount of facts, no debunking of their beliefs can affect them. I used to work with a guy who said over lunch one day, when Obama was first publicly known, that he "didn't think America was ready for a Muslim president".

                    He got a few laughs, but responded by implying that everybody who laughed was naive.

                    After a few weeks of emailed links, mountains of evidence (from his fellow Republicans,too) he stood his ground, letting everybody know that they were entitled to their opinion, and he was entitled to his.

                    He'll probably go to his grave "knowing" that Barack Obama is a Secret Muslim.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by bachmaij (January 22, 2011 3:18 pm ET)
                       
                    I hope you're right.

                    But the internet can be a great resource for ignorance, misinformation, and propaganda as well as actual knowledge.
                    Report Abuse
          • Author by newzhound (January 20, 2011 9:30 am ET)
            4  
            Actually, I believe the average age of his listeners is somewhere between the late 50's and early 60's. You'll find that's true of most conservative shows.

            Nothing wrong with being in the age range - I am. But he doesn't attract a wide variety - a very narrow set, indeed.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (January 20, 2011 9:01 am ET)
        6  
        Rush has a high school diploma . . . that's all. He's not an expert on anything except being a jackass. He does that quite well.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by vega (January 20, 2011 1:13 am ET)
      3  
      Every single Rush Limbaugh show sounds the same to me. Why would any sane person listen to him?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by curiousindependent (January 20, 2011 12:33 pm ET)
        4  
        Sane people don't. If they do, they quickly find themselves no longer sane.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Festus (January 20, 2011 1:09 pm ET)
          3
        So does every Keith Olberman show. Why would any sane person watch him?

        Oh, that's right.

        No one sane or not watches Keith O.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by WilliamHolden (January 20, 2011 8:38 am ET)
      4  
      The guy is a creep, creepier the amount of money he makes for being creepy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by sullivan4239 (January 20, 2011 9:34 am ET)
        4  
        He's the middle school bully who never grew up.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Nihilist (January 20, 2011 9:57 am ET)
          6  
          no, he's the kid who always got picked on, and has been carrying this baggage [in many ways] to this day....

          i also have a suspicion that rush is a closeted gay. guys like him have so much guilt about their preference, that they project their hurt outward....
          Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (January 20, 2011 9:56 am ET)
      2  
      It should be 1/19/11, not 1/19/10
      Report Abuse
    • Author by semiarid (January 20, 2011 10:17 am ET)
      3  
      Limbaugh is uneducated but glib. Not exactly state-department material.

      It's not to Americans' credit, but it is to his own credit that he's done so well as a propagandist.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LeanGreenMachine (January 20, 2011 4:00 pm ET)
        4
      This is all a 5th grade level argument. If Obama was as transparent as he says he is then there would have been subtitles on the screen. Limbaugh was only making that point using his own style. All of the network news shows, cable news shows, talk radio shows, and public radio shows are purely entertainment pushing their views for the right or left. If they were serious they would just tell the story as is and never refer to any of the other shows. We should all listen to the information each provides in order to get a complete picture of what is actually going on. There are only a few that will come close to actually telling the full story and even that is subjective. Pull your heads out and focus on what the real story is and you will discover the truth.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Maimon (January 22, 2011 4:20 pm ET)
        2  
        Well it is only "information" if it is acurate and reliable. Rush is neither. The idea is to create belief in his listeners, not inform them.

        Rush is a propagandist or I prefer the term "Propatainment artist". And no, there is real news and debate. Watch a real journalist like Diane Sawyer, Jim Leher, Christian Amanpour, etc... they have their own slant, but they try to not let it DOMINATE the narrative.

        Also, Fox tries to overwhelm the conversation with myths, fear and disinformation. Take for example Sean Hannity a huge supporter of Bush and the War in Iraq. He will claim they found WMDs, which is not true. But he says it. Ask any analyst from the CIA, Mossad or MI-5 and they will tell you Saddam had none. Hannity will claim that Saddam had ties to Al-Queda. Ask any expert on terrorism and you will find them telling you " NO, absolutely not true".

        So why listen to a source that really want to disinform you? Why listen to Rush when the goal is not to inform you, but to create false beliefs?

        The arguement of "fair and balanced" only holds true if the arguement being made is a real arguement from fact. I don't invite the"Flat earth society" to a discussion on planetary thinking, because they have a false belief.I don't invite a psychic surgeon to a medical discussion on surgery now do I?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (January 20, 2011 4:04 pm ET)
        2
      How petty is Media Matters? Really. Who cares about this? It doesn't mean anything.

      This site is well on its way to becoming a comedy site because it seems like all they do lately is post minimal, petty things now.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by congero6189599 (January 21, 2011 2:01 am ET)
        2  
        Most of the comedy comes from your postings.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by balzarfriesen (January 21, 2011 8:56 am ET)
        4  
        MagCynic. It is not petty to criticize someone for making racist comments based on the fact that they are too lazy and ignorant to learn a second language. Many Chinese people today speak English. Few English speakers speak Chinese. This broadcast merely highlights the decreasing standards for American education and advancement. Rush Limbaugh is trying to convince Americans to go backwards disregarding the notion that all men are created equal which alleged patriots like him ought to embrace, whereas China is moving forwards.

        Rush Limbaugh is no patriot. He is not a a believer in democracy. He believes in money and from what I've heard, illegal drug use. He's also always been overweight, which suggests that he probable overeats. He's a glutton, a criminal, a drug addict, a racist and pretty much just an all around bad fellow. America may still be ahead, but as the old show business joke goes, America will meet China on on their way down as China passes them on their ascension to the top.

        The most important thing to note is that for all of Rush Limbaugh's wining, mocking, insulting and sheer lack of intelligence, it won't make any difference in the rise of China as a global power. In that respect, your comments are somewhat correct. It doesn't mean anything. Rush Limbaugh doesn't matter. He's just trying to make a buck by insulting people without the benefit of being humorous. His opinions are irrelevant and insignificant.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by StewartIII (January 20, 2011 10:29 pm ET)
      2  
      ChickaBOOMer: China Syndrome
      http://chickaboomer.blogspot.com/2011/01/rush-limbaugh-defends-his-what-some.html
      Report Abuse
    • Author by canaanxing9025 (January 21, 2011 11:23 am ET)
         
      Note to Rush: Except for Santa Claus, fat men should not wear red.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by j238 (January 21, 2011 2:14 pm ET)
      2  
      I know rush is marketed as "conservative".

      Actually, he's got his own ideology. Back in eighth grade we had two words for this, "acting stupid".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Turey (January 21, 2011 3:42 pm ET)
      1 1
      Be careful Rushie, this people could be your new bosses in just a few years.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LSD-39 (January 21, 2011 8:00 pm ET)
        1
      As I watched tv tonite 9 year old Obama is in conversation with the Chinese minister ,feel like a nut Rush?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by GreenLantern (January 21, 2011 8:59 pm ET)
      2 1
      I did not know Olberman was signing off of Countdown!
      He will be missed!
      :(
      Report Abuse
      • Author by onementalgiant (January 22, 2011 4:52 pm ET)
        1 3
        Sorry to tell you but he didn't "sign off" GL. He was fired. Big difference.

        Let's be thankful his lies won't be aired any longer for the gullible lemmings who actually believed all of his garbage.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bachmaij (January 22, 2011 3:12 pm ET)
         
      Everybody should listen to this Limbaugh clip. We can really see how much of an idiot this guy is.

      He "can't comprehend of anybody understanding it [Chinese]." Well gee, there's only like a BILLION or so people who do.

      And maybe if he can't comprehend THAT, he can't comprehend some other HARDER subjects like science, philosophy, or economics. Maybe people shouldn't take this guy so seriously anymore...
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.