Dobbs Falsely Claims "Very Few" State And Local Government Jobs Have Been Eliminated
Fox Business host Lou Dobbs claimed that "very few jobs have been lost" at the local and state levels in the last few years. In fact, state and local governments have shed more than 500,000 jobs since July 2008 -- while the private sector is in its 12th month of job growth.
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Dobbs Claims "Very Few Jobs Have Been Lost At The Local, State And Federal Level"
From the April 11 edition of Fox News' America Live:
SHANNON BREAM (guest host): We understand that the president now is going to speak on Wednesday and talk about debt and deficit reduction, and we understand too from White House spokesman Jay Carney that he's going to talk about shared fiscal responsibility. So is it time now for the federal government to make some of those tough sacrifices just like American families are having to make? Maybe not filling some of these positions, not necessarily cutting, but maybe not filling everything that's open now.
DOBBS: Well, I don't see any reason to say, frankly, that this is shared sacrifice. While millions and millions of private sector jobs have been lost over the course of the last four years, very few jobs have been lost at the local, state, and federal level. That is an immunity that defies either a sense of equity or propriety. It just isn't the American way. This is a free enterprise, capitalist economy that has built wealth not only for this great nation but for the entire world. We have got to get our leadership reoriented to prosperity as a principled goal of public policy, Shannon. I mean it's not a difficult thing for these folks. [Fox News, America Live, 4/11/11]
State And Local Government Employment Has Fallen By More Than Half A Million
St. Louis Fed: Local Governments Have Shed Approximately 416,000 Jobs Since 2008. From the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis:

[Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, accessed 4/11/11]
St. Louis Fed: State Governments Have Shed Approximately 90,000 Jobs Since 2008. From the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis:
[Federal Reserve Economic Data, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, accessed 4/11/11]
Income Strategist: While Private Sector Jobs Increase, State, Local Governments Will Cut 20,000 To 30,000 Jobs A Month Through At Least End Of 2011. From a March 5 Wall Street Journal article:
State and local governments, aiming to reduce their budget deficits, cut jobs at an accelerating pace in February.
Even as private employment climbed for the 12th consecutive month in February, states and localities shed a combined 30,000 jobs after cutting 8,000 positions a month earlier, the Labor Department said Friday. The trend is likely to continue as states and cities keep trimming services and payrolls to mend their budget shortfalls.
State and local governments stepped up their pace of cutting positions, such as police officers.
"We won't expect the government cutbacks to reverse any time in the near future," said Guy LeBas, chief fixed income strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott. "It's going to be a slow leak of 20,000 to 30,000 jobs a month lasting at least until the end of 2011." [The Wall Street Journal, 3/5/11]
Economist Zandi: State, Local Cuts Could Keep Unemployment From Falling Below 9 Percent By End Of 2011. From a February 4 Bloomberg BusinessWeek article:
President Barack Obama's goal of driving the unemployment rate below 9 percent this year is threatened by state and local budget cuts that are likely to intensify as Federal stimulus money runs out.
Austerity measures may add as much as 0.25 percentage point to the unemployment rate this year, according to Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics Inc.
"This could make the difference between ending 2011 with unemployment above or below 9 percent," he said. "There's no more serious drag on economic growth than the severe budget cutbacks at the state and local level."
Reductions in public payrolls will ripple through the economy, slicing revenue at companies that rely on government contracts and depressing spending among those who are thrown out of work, Zandi said. The result could be the loss of 600,000 jobs in the fiscal year that starts July 1, he said. [Bloomberg BusinessWeek, 2/4/11]

















They should be doing an anti-big-government victory dance.
I hope that good quality people who used to work for the government can lend their considerable skills to private sector jobs.
OMG Have you ever worked for a large corporation?
If you did, were you ever paying attention while you were there?
Large corporations grow layers of middle management like cancer, few of them "produce" anything other than graphs and reports.
You want streamlined and efficient? Try a smaller business that has minimal layers between the actual workers, and the guy at the top. Companies where management actually goes on the floor and works the jobs. You won't find many of them but; they are out there.
Then again, when your math says that 40% is a majority, perhaps half a million jobs really is very few.
And you think you are better than O'Keefe.
What original source was selectively edited here?
Why are you so stupid? Why are you so brainwashed? Why are you so dishonest? Why are you so pathetic?
I know but want you to admit how much you are biased by anything left.
Stupid is as stupid does.
GOD but you are stupid and pathetic. Why dont you STFU till you at least learn to read.
I think most people are better than O'keefe, you perhaps being an exception.
Keep up the lies, MMFA loves selective editing and they love people that back their deception.
Federal: 2.79, 2.85 (+0.06)
State: 5.20, 5.12 (-0.09)
Local: 14.59, 14.20 (-0.39)
TOTAL: 22.58, 22.17 (-0.42)
[there are rounding errors]
So there were 416,000 lost jobs, of which local government employment changes made up the vast majority.
The OPM puts out quarterly detailed data of Federal employment. The best data we have under Obama runs from 12/08 to 12/10 - roughly the same period as the above data which showed a very small (2%) increase in Federal employment.
Of the increase in employment, 91% were concentrated in Cabinet-level agencies. Within that, 82% was in just four agencies - defense (51%), veterans affairs (19%), homeland security (7%), and justice (6%).
I don't mind mmfa taking exception with the accuracy of Dobbs. But to omit part of his statement is slimy.
Now to the accuracy of mmfa's rebuttal:
-- Since January 2008, net of census hiring, the federal government has grown by 3.5 percent, gaining 98,000 jobs. --
-- Since the beginning of the recession, state governments have added 42,000 employees to their payrolls. Local governments have cut 258,000 jobs --
-- Overall, total government employment has shrunk by 0.5 percent since January 2008. And the private sector has lost 7.2 million jobs, or 6 percent of its January 2008 workforce. --