About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

University Officials Conclude Latest Investigation Discrediting Breitbart

May 10, 2011 12:38 pm ET — 41 Comments

University of Missouri officials Monday issued a statement concluding that Andrew Breitbart-promoted videos smearing university lecturers were "highly distorted through splicing and editing." This is just the latest investigation to discredit deceptively edited videos promoted by Breitbart.

University Officials: Big Government Video Was "Highly Distorted" And "Out Of Context"

Big Government: Videos Prove Professors Teach "Fear, Intimidation, And, Even, Industrial Sabotage." In April, Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment website posted a series of clearly edited videos and claimed they showed evidence of, among other things, professors "instruct[ing] students on how fear, intimidation, and, even, industrial sabotage are important and, often, necessary tools." [BigGovernment, 4/25/11, 4/25/11]

Fact: Big Government Eliminated Crucial Context And Qualifying Statements From Video Excerpts. Media Matters obtained and reviewed the context of remarks highlighted in the video Breitbart promoted. The video clearly excised crucially qualifying statements in a way that changes the meaning of what the speakers were saying, including portions where a professor explicitly rejected violence as an ineffective tactic. [See the truth HERE]

University: Big Gov Videos Are "Highly Distorted Through Splicing And Editing." Officials at the University of Missouri-St. Louis concluded an investigation into the allegations promoted by Breitbart's web sites, and stated:

The excerpts that were made public showing the University of Missouri-St. Louis (UMSL) instructor Don Giljum and students as well as the UMKC instructor and students were definitely taken out of context, with their meaning highly distorted through splicing and editing from different times within a class period and across multiple class periods. [St. Louis Activist Hub, 5/9/2011]

Past Investigations Have Criticized Breitbart-Promoted Videos For Deceptive Editing

California Attorney General: ACORN Videos Were "Severely Edited." After investigating James O'Keefe's heavily edited ACORN tapes - which Breitbart aggressively promoted -the California Attorney General's office reported:

Videotapes secretly recorded last summer and severely edited by O'Keefe seemed to show ACORN employees encouraging a "pimp" (O'Keefe) and his "prostitute," actually a Florida college student named Hannah Giles, in conversations involving prostitution by underage girls, human trafficking and cheating on taxes. Those videos created a media sensation.

Evidence obtained by Brown tells a somewhat different story, however, as reflected in three videotapes made at ACORN locations in California. One ACORN worker in San Diego called the cops. Another ACORN worker in San Bernardino caught on to the scheme and played along with it, claiming among other things that she had murdered her abusive husband. Her two former husbands are alive and well, the Attorney General's report noted. At the beginning and end of the Internet videos, O'Keefe was dressed as a 1970s Superfly pimp, but in his actual taped sessions with ACORN workers, he was dressed in a shirt and tie, presented himself as a law student, and said he planned to use the prostitution proceeds to run for Congress. He never claimed he was a pimp.

"The evidence illustrates," Brown said, "that things are not always as partisan zealots portray them through highly selective editing of reality. Sometimes a fuller truth is found on the cutting room floor." [California State Department Of Justice, 4/1/10]

NY Daily News: Law Enforcement Source Criticizes O'Keefe And Giles For Editing ACORN Tape "To Meet Their Agenda." A March 1, 2010, New York Daily News article reported that "a law enforcement source" said O'Keefe and Giles "edited the tape to meet their agenda." [New York Daily News, 3/1/10]

NY Post: Brooklyn DA Sources Criticize "'Heavily Edited' Splice Job."  A March 2, 2010, New York Post article, reported, "The video that unleashed a firestorm of criticism on the activist group ACORN was a 'heavily edited' splice job that only made it appear as though the organization's workers were advising a pimp and prostitute on how to get a mortgage, sources said yesterday." The Post further reported, "Many of the seemingly crime-encouraging answers were taken out of context so as to appear more sinister, sources said." [NY Post, 3/2/10]

Breitbart Admitted Sherrod Video He Posted Was "Out Of Context." In an interview with Daniel Stone of Newsweek, Breitbart agreed that video he promoted that portrayed then-USDA official Shirley Sherrod as a racist was "out of context":

Stone: But do you agree that the edited video took things out of context?

Breitbart: Well, yes. But I put up what I had. It granted a great portion of her redemptive tale, but not all of it. If I could do it all over again, I should have waited for the full video to get to me. [Newsweek07/30/10]

Breitbart Is Widely Discredited For Promoting Deceptively Edited Video

CNN's Cooper: Breitbart Pushed Video That Was "Clearly Edited To Deceive And Slander Ms. Sherrod." CNN's Anderson Cooper said that Breitbart's video clip of Sherrod "was clearly edited to deceive and slander Ms. Sherrod," and that Breitbart's efforts to "weasel his way out of taking responsibility for what he did to Ms. Sherrod is a classic example of what is wrong with our national discourse." [CNN, Anderson Cooper 360,7/21/10]

Politico's Ben Smith: "Breitbart's Sites Now Have A Growing Credibility Problem." The Politico's Ben Smith wrote: "The nice thing about the new-media space is how quickly it self-corrects. Breitbart's sites now have a growing credibility problem." [Politico, 7/22/10]

MSNBC's O'Donnell: "I Think [Breitbart] Has Lost His Standing To Present Videos To The Country At Any Time." MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell said that Breitbart "has lost his standing to present videos to the country at any time," adding that the ACORN videos promoted by Breitbart were "manipulated in ways that were grotesquely unfair to the people in those scenes." [MSNBC's Morning Joe, 7/22/10]

SPJ Official: Breitbart Is "Someone With A Specific Agenda." Andy Schotz, ethics committee chair at the Society of Professional Journalists, said: "Basic journalism calls for getting information, checking it out, looking for context and trying to get to the truth ... Gathering snippets and putting them out there to see what happens seems to be what is happening here. (Breitbart) is also someone with a specific agenda." [Mediamatters.org, 7/21/10]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Boswell (May 10, 2011 1:09 pm ET)
      7  
      he's just a Leni Riefenstahl wannabe without her talent but with all her "morality" and "integrity" ( in quotes to indicate those words are being used ironically, not their usual meanings)(sad that I need to detail that for the trolls)
      Report Abuse
        • Author by dommanno3075 (May 10, 2011 11:42 pm ET)
          5  
          They have given their full support to quash any conservative scum
          Well, yes, scum should be quashed.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mari2jj (May 12, 2011 1:41 am ET)
               
            I do get a big chuckle when all this hand wringing is started by the fans of the proven liar (Breitbat). No other comment in necessary when Breitbart's statements are in question. He lied on National Television and is never to be trusted again. no matter how public his whine is. He in no way represents my own moderate to conservative ideals. He is never to be trusted again and it is obvious he is still out trying to push his disgusting swill.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Johaely (May 11, 2011 12:02 am ET)
          4  
          So the professors should sit down while Breitbart gets ready to defame them because, hey, that's what anybody leaning to the left or, to quote you, "socialist Obama worshipers" should do, sit down and let the so called conservatives beat them up. Liberals deserve no voice, representation or chance in the public arena, right?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by wookie (May 11, 2011 8:38 am ET)
          4  
          They have given their full support to quash any conservative scum who dares blaspheme the words of Obama the great & his enlightened socialist know-it-alls.


          The trolls are getting pretty lazy around here. Do you have any counter argument to the investigation that doesn't involve Commies hiding under your bed?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikelartist (May 11, 2011 9:11 am ET)
          4  
          No. They watched 18 plus hours of video, protected the privacy of their students, determined the videos were spliced to put words into the mouths of the professors that were not their own, thereby taking them out of context. They apologized the professors and condemned Breibart and Loesch. Breibart and Loesch ironically are educational suspects. They were both lackluster students and/or drop-outs. They are anti-education propagandists. Could they have a motive? Perhaps it is envy? Low self esteem? They are doing little to help their own cause by continually exposing their bias and lies after being rebuked time after time.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by blurider (May 11, 2011 10:18 am ET)
          3  
          Soooooo, what would that have to do with this University of MISSOURI report?

          ..and of course, even in your fictitious 'Mississippi' example - WE HAVE ANOTHER FICTION!
          You right wing authoritarians, learn 'monkey see, monkey do' pretty fast!
          IDIOT, TROLL!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by GreenLantern (May 11, 2011 11:12 am ET)
          2  
          Lets see the proof that breitbart did not splice the footage. Show us with a logical argument that he did not change the meaning of what the professors were saying.
          Your name calling as an argument is really sad. Prove your points!
          UGH!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by CoolSlaw (May 11, 2011 1:22 pm ET)
          3  
          University of Mississippi socialist Obama worshipers fell in line and produced a report ghost written by the DNC propoganda corp.


          Maybe they are tired of seeing KNOWN FRAUDS like Breitbart smear and undermine the professions and careers of hard working people to score cheap political points through trickery and deceit?

          A shame your projection is just Obama derangement syndrome kicked into overdrive by the news of the last few weeks and the desire to defend anyone who is a name in the GOP machine, regardless of their credibility, or in Breitbart's case, lack of credibility.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Missouri Democrat (May 11, 2011 3:24 pm ET)
          4  
          Not much for reading comprehension are you Max? It was the University of Missouri not Mississippi. Oh let me guess they both start with Miss so it's the same. Yeesh!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (May 12, 2011 9:17 am ET)
             
          Max

          GOD but you are pathetic. You are a liar. You are brainwashed and staggeringly stupid. You are far too stupid to even know what a socialist is. Why dont you just STFU and stop humiliting yourself?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (May 11, 2011 1:11 am ET)
        4  
        I have a friend who says, "If Breitbart's lips are moving, he is telling a great big lie." That definitely sounds factual. But we expect racists to behave like Breitbart. As a lifelong Republican, I find Breitbart's "loose with the truth" approach totally embarrassing and certainly unGodly!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (May 12, 2011 1:34 am ET)
           
        No need to restate the issue. Breitbart is a proven "worst of the bunch" liar. We all noted that during his public humiliation when he doctored the Shirley Sherrod tape and was proven to be the liar of the century. Any one who would do such a disgusting thing to that woman has NO credibility left. But in the end, Shirley cleaned this creeps clock! He is a proven, rotten racist! Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me! I shall NEVER believe another thing Breitbart says, no not ever!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by historygeek001 (May 10, 2011 1:19 pm ET)
      7  
      And the wingnuts will continue to pretend that Breitbart's transparent lies make sense because they prefer talking points to reality (see: climate change deniers, birthers, flat-earthers, etc.).
      Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (May 11, 2011 1:28 pm ET)
        6  
        I don't know why they even bother with these cut, paste, edit, splice, and chop jobs anymore.

        They right wing base believes whatever they're told by these frauds anyway. May as well just produce it in animated cartoon form and avoid all the trouble of having to defend the obvious hack and paste jobs.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by capt spalding (May 12, 2011 12:03 am ET)
           
        Don't forget the Creationists, particularly in Louisiana and Tennessee.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (May 10, 2011 1:20 pm ET)
      8  

      FACT #1: Usama bin Laden wanted to bring economic ruin to America, among others.

      FACT #2: Breitbart is well aware that it costs his targets money to refute his hit pieces, placing even more strain on his targets' resources.

      QUESTION: Andrew Breitbart, why do you hate America?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hoopvillain (May 10, 2011 1:45 pm ET)
      4  
      Why in the world would anyone ever cite his website, use him as a commentator, post his comments or in any way confer upon him any legitimacy what so ever? This imposter's sole purpose is to discredit those that he disagrees with and that includes all thoughtful people, both on the right and left.
      Andrew Brietbart is a lying, deceitful propagandist.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (May 10, 2011 1:51 pm ET)
        5  
        I'll tell you why - there are a great number of authoritarian thinkers who NEED to hear his message to justify their hate-filled view of the world.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mrahen (May 10, 2011 3:04 pm ET)
          5  
          Like Rush?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Turkeysocks (May 11, 2011 1:50 am ET)
            4  
            Can ya give us a quote of Foghornleghorn ever making a raciest joke? Give us a link to the comment while you are at it.

            If you can't prove something like that, then Max, what you've done is slander.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by blk-in-alabam (May 11, 2011 8:26 am ET)
              4  
              Or a link to the hand hooding the maxconrad sock puppet with the foot fungus
              Report Abuse
          • Author by CoolSlaw (May 11, 2011 1:30 pm ET)
            3  
            No, like fog. He loves racist jokes, especially about jews in nazi ovens & calling jews pedophiles.


            Those are some nasty allegations. Back them up or you are nothing but a libelous troll.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (May 11, 2011 1:17 am ET)
        3  
        Remember his exposed lie about Sherrod? Breitbart has forever given up any journalistic credibility with that bold faced lie he trumped up with his creative editing and his release of the lie/doctored tape to the public. But all he did was confirm to the entire world he is not to be trusted. That he even thinks any of us believe a word he says shows what a sick puppy the guy really is. He has no shame even though he was proven to be a liar!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CoolSlaw (May 11, 2011 1:33 pm ET)
          3  
          Fool me once Breitbart,...shame on you.

          Fool me twice Breitbart,...shame on me.

          Conservatives who buy anything this proven FRAUD puts out there at this point are just fools who have no shame apparently.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by HRN (May 12, 2011 6:51 am ET)
            1  
            I noticed that in either of your examples, listening to Breitbart is cause for shame....
            Report Abuse
    • Author by bonvechioc (May 10, 2011 4:42 pm ET)
      6  
      Unfortunately this sort of scumbaggery (i want credit if that becomes a new word!) works. Acorn, PBS and the Dept of Ag lady all show that lying does work. Sure in a few days/weeks it will be exposed but by that time either the person has been fired or at least most of the public will never hear about the deception.
      And not if but when you get caught there are no consequences!!
      Your not fired or discredited, still used as a talking head. Heck they will use this tactic for a long long time.

      Still waiting to see what exactly these people would have to do to be discredited. It's not on the horizon yet.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Always Right (May 10, 2011 5:11 pm ET)
         
      So a leftist organization says a right-winger is wrong. Shocking!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (May 10, 2011 6:13 pm ET)
      3  
      There should never be another investigation into Breitbart because nobody should pay him any attention. Simply declare that his latest bilge is a lie, whether it is or not, and he'll deserve the declaration.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by slowtyper (May 10, 2011 6:48 pm ET)
      5  
      amazing that anyone, anywhere, for any reason would attach any credence to anything brightfart would produce..i mean really, the stench of his lies and distortions have lingered far to long..
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Turkeysocks (May 11, 2011 1:51 am ET)
      3  
      Did any logical sane person on here think they wouldn't investigate this and find it to be complete bull?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by lather (May 11, 2011 9:36 am ET)
      4  
      The Student is a Plant.
      [url=http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=13&ved=0CCMQFjACOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DFy490UpIh0o&rct=j&q=Philip%20Christofanelli&ei=JY7KTai7KazOiALjgYGJBQ&usg=AFQjCNGcEdehRibp5FW2tN7kRQWPaQkCwA&sig2=DdNY1NAMKhjLj1QeiYhBIg&cad=rja]Plant[/url]
      The Mission Statement says the gov has failed them.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by lather (May 11, 2011 9:38 am ET)
        4  
        Ouch that didn't turn out the way I planned.
        I had like ... 4 links on there.. What the heck???
        I Blame the Commies and Medical Pot!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by RavenRog (May 11, 2011 10:21 am ET)
      1 6
      Just stick to Shirley Sherrod, MMfA....it's the only time Breitbart got his hands caught in the cookie jar.

      Of course Brietbart has an agenda. Name an investigative reporter or blogger that doesn't. He's not trying to be mainstream, just effective. And he is, like it or not.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by JoeSixpack (May 11, 2011 10:44 am ET)
        5  
        Yes, he's very effective at deceiving morons who desperately want to swallow the crap he's peddling. With actual thinking people, not so much.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (May 11, 2011 11:23 am ET)
        3  
        Yeah, you're right. I'm still outraged by how Woodward and Bernstein edited video to make it appear that Nixon's people broke into DNC headquarters...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CoolSlaw (May 11, 2011 1:38 pm ET)
        2  
        Just stick to Shirley Sherrod, MMfA....it's the only time Breitbart got his hands caught in the cookie jar.



        -MMFA has documented numerous lies and distortions from his websites.

        -They've exposed some of his writers and "experts" as being snake oil salesmen who have a history of making outrageous and fraudulent claims

        -Breitbart helped promote the fraudulent works of known video manipulator and slanderer James O'keefe.

        -Now they've proven this whole attack on teachers is a fraudulent, hack and paste job.

        At what point will you conservatives take off the blinders and accept this man is a disgrace to very concept of journalism?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by yoiksaway (May 11, 2011 9:05 pm ET)
        1  
        "He's not trying to be mainstream, just effective. And he is, like it or not."--RavenRog

        Joseph Goebbels was effective, like it or not. Will you defend him?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by edrossinoelwein9669 (May 11, 2011 10:14 pm ET)
        1
      Can you say, "Whitewash?"
      One guest lecturer was recruiting for the Communist Party, looking to 'take over' the Democratic party (as if they already aren't controlled by idiots).
      But, hey, who cares? It's only taxpayer money being used to subvert the United States.
      Report Abuse