About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Conservative Media Shout "Class Warfare" To Defend Tax Breaks On Corporate Jets

June 30, 2011 4:22 pm ET — 75 Comments

The right-wing media responded with outrage after President Obama called on Congress to eliminate tax breaks on corporate jets in order to help stave off a default crisis -- accusing Obama of waging "class warfare."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

"Class Warfare": Right-Wing Media Figures Object To Rolling Back Tax Breaks For Corporate Jets

Fox's Bolling: Focusing On Corporate Tax Breaks Was "Not Fair" And  "Was A Class Warfare." Commenting on Obama's press conference, Fox Business host Eric Bolling said that Obama "talked yesterday about corporate jets, hedge fund managers, oil companies, saying if they're not willing to give up their corporate jets than poor community college kids weren't going to be able to go to school, and God forbid we don't have a National Weather Service. That's not fair." Bolling further said, "It was a class warfare he set up, and it was completely off base. If we really just bring some entitlement spending in line and you can fix it." [Fox News, Fox & Friends, 6/30/11]

Dobbs: Obama's Speech Was "Straightforward Class Warfare." On his Fox Business show, Lou Dobbs said, "Did you hear the president today talking about millionaires, billionaires, and corporate jets? I mean, that's straightforward class warfare." [Fox Business, Lou Dobbs Tonight, 6/29/11]

Limbaugh: "Obama Once Again Cranking Up The Class Warfare." Playing a clip of President Obama's press conference, Rush Limbaugh said on his radio show:

LIMBAUGH: Here is Obama with corporate jet owners in the crosshairs again -- and remember, now, it was just last week, the USA Today ran a story about how the corporate jets were starting to fly again, corporate jet owners were utilizing the aircraft. It was a sign! USA Today so happy! It was a sign of economic recovery. Today in his press conference, Obama once again cranking up the class warfare.

[...]

RUSH: This is just -- dangerous is what this is. This is full-fledged demagoguery, and we're listening to this from the chief architect of the destruction of this economy. And once again, pitting groups of Americans against each other. One group -- his aim is for one group of Americans to hate and despise another group. What? What are you - well, that's what he's banking on: he's banking on that most Americans will agree with him because this is fair, and to a certain extent there's some Americans who will agree with it. [Premiere Radio Networks, The Rush Limbaugh Show, 6/29/11]

Beck: Obama "Launched An Unprecedented Class Warfare" On The "Private Jet Class." On his radio program, Glenn Beck accused Obama of singling out "the private jet class." Beck said:

Once again, yesterday, Barack Obama showed his sheer, unadulterated disgust for the wealthy, the successful, and anyone who's ever tried to do anything with their life here in America. He disparages them. Big business he disparages, of all kinds, every chance he gets. He has launched an unprecedented class warfare in this country, and the media remains silent. [Premiere Radio Networks, The Glenn Beck Program, 6/30/11]

Drudge: "Obama Launches Class Warfare." The Drudge Report displayed the following headline in a link to a National Journal story about Obama's press conference:

drudge

[Drudge Report, 6/30/11, cached version]

RedState: Obama Went "Straight For The Class Warfare Jugular." From a post to the conservative blog RedState:

Barack Obama has once more taken a major crisis and turned into a campaign prop. The entire debate on the debt ceiling is one big false choice now. We can have a $25Tr national debt in 10 years and feed the children, or all we really care about is rich people with private jets. And let me be clear, we're talking rich, corporate people with private jets. Like Al Gore for example.

Leave it to a liberal to go straight for the class warfare jugular when they have no valid point whatsoever. [RedState, 6/29/11]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rumpleteasermom (June 30, 2011 4:30 pm ET)
      20 1
      He!! yes, it's class warfare and it's about time we start lobbing a few back.

      In case you haven't noticed, class warfare has been happening for a couple of decades ow and while those at the top have lobbed round after round on those less fortunate, we have been idly sitting by hoping things will improve. It is well past time we start pushing back a little and insist on a little fairness in the system.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by zerosumgame0005 (June 30, 2011 5:11 pm ET)
        6  
        they are just PO'ed at their constant attack on the other 90% have been detected and that we are so uppity that we object.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by katanakumori (June 30, 2011 6:01 pm ET)
        3 29
        Whining & jealous losers.

        Unsuccessful people clamoring to take from those they envy.

        How many kids could have gone to college with the $800,000 dollars Michelle Obama just spent going to Africa?

        Oh yeah, and her private jet is bigger than 99% of corporate jets.

        Whining & jealous losers.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (June 30, 2011 6:24 pm ET)
          23 2
          Whining & jealous losers.


          Are you referring to your whining about Michelle Obama ? Yeah, you really do sound like a jealous loser.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jonimacaroni1 (June 30, 2011 6:35 pm ET)
          15  
          Yeah, like the first lady of the USA shouldn't get to fly anywhere. She should simply stay in the White House all the time. She shouldn't go out to church or to shop for clothes - she should just continue to wear the same things, and not get to do anything while she's married to the President.

          /snark/

          It's ridiculous to suggest that she shouldn't get to do stuff while she's married to the President. It's ridiculous to assert that she's not an asset for the USA.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by wookie (June 30, 2011 7:13 pm ET)
          25  
          How many kids could have gone to college with the $800,000 dollars Michelle Obama just spent going to Africa?


          Probably a lot less than could have gone with the trillions that the "successful" bankers took throught unapologetic fraud.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by thaneb (June 30, 2011 7:25 pm ET)
          10  
          Is that your real name? Finest Samurai swords? Forgive my question: There have been so many right-wingers on this site who've had a bizarre need for glory evinced by a pretentious screen name.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by fantagor (June 30, 2011 7:43 pm ET)
            9  
            Kumori translates to shadow, cloudiness or cloudy weather. So,

            Shadow sword or Cloudy sword.

            Here's a better handle for him:

            Anaboko-Ketsu

            Randy

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Johaely (July 01, 2011 12:51 pm ET)
              1  
              Personally i would have suggested ahoyarou, but yours is more appropriate and to the point.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by Maimon (June 30, 2011 9:22 pm ET)
          9 1
          Ahhh...I'm not sure what your point is. Are you saying that rich people "earned" their money? Or are you unhappy that President Obama's family is traveling the world? Isn't that what people of influence are suppose to do?

          President Obama went to India to secure business deals.
          President Obama has been to many place to improve US relations. First Lady Michelle Obama is doing the same.You think that $800 000 is a problem try $3.9 trillion as thr estimated cost for thr two wars, then add in $2.9 trillion in tax cuts for the rich. So in ten years ( 2000 to 2010) we wasted $7 trillion. You penny wise and pound foolish my friend...

          Are you paying for people's education, other than through taxes? Are you investing in the future of America, or are you simply taking? What are you doing to make this a better place? Just curious.

          A classic example of veiled class warfare is how the right blames Barney Frank, and by default poor people, for the housing bubble. Oddly, it was mostly well to do white people that lost their investments from that crisis. Ohh and it was created by Goldman Sachs..AIG...Lehman Brothers, etc...The idea was to blame Acorn, who by the way had very few people lose their houses because they advised them PROPERLY.

          If you look at Greece and its economic troubles, the current problems stems from investment companies , like Goldman Sachs. these companies helped to hide the Greek debt problem in teh early 1990's and then lured investors. I will say in teh last 200 years Greece has been in default on its debt for 50 of those years.

          blah..blah...

          Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley_fpt (July 01, 2011 1:35 am ET)
          3  
          Why do you hate America?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Whispers (July 01, 2011 2:17 am ET)
          6 1
          AC for our troops in the Middle East costs $20 billion/year.

          But you want to save $800k by putting Michelle Obama under house arrest?

          Not very strong with numbers, are you?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Pilot1 (July 01, 2011 10:19 am ET)
          2 12
          In addition to her jet to fly the kids , grandmother, friends, nephews and onterge she had a military cargo plane to transport her "toys". All to eat French fries and deep fried fat cakes!
          Do as I say, not as I do!
          Let them eat (fat) cake!
          No belt tightening in the Obama Admin. That's for the others to do!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Johaely (July 01, 2011 12:14 pm ET)
            6 2
            What's an onterge? And are you stalking Michelle Obama to know what she is eating or are you just making $#!t up?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (July 01, 2011 3:40 pm ET)
              6  
              Onterge? That has to be the best of the worst spelling attempt I've seen in a long, long time. I'll have to make a mental note that Pilot1 is a mental midget.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by foghornleghorn (July 01, 2011 3:40 pm ET)
              2  
              Onterge? That has to be the best of the worst spelling attempt I've seen in a long, long time. I'll have to make a mental note that Pilot1 is a mental midget.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Maimon (July 01, 2011 5:21 pm ET)
            5  
            Hmmm...are the GOPers not the ones afraid of a jet tax?

            Heads of State travel to secure business deals and to promote peaceful relations. I guess Presiddent Obama should sell the Whitehouse and move into a more "eco-friendly house", and trade in the armored limo for a Prius?

            Pilot you obviously listen to Rush and think you are smart because you read Ann Coulter.

            I'm guessing you really don't get that the President represents our country and uses those TOOLS to promote our country.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 01, 2011 11:52 am ET)
          6  
          I hope you were paid well to write that (and think that way) but I doubt it. The loyalty of small men can be bought cheaply because greed has no pride.

          I don't envy you.

          You possess nothing I want, and I would have to sacrifice most of what makes me human to meet you on your level.

          You lot are possessed by fear and motivated by ignorance.

          BOTTOM LINE: Anyone who doesn't make $300,000+ a year and votes Republican is either clinically psychotic or functionally retarded. (And the rest are just greedy. Rational, perhaps. But still greedy.)

          Get a brain, moran.

          No one achieves their success in a vaccuum.

          ---------------------------------------
          IMHO
          UTOPIA
          Report Abuse
      • Author by rd12 (June 30, 2011 11:01 pm ET)
           
        Amen brother. What the conservatives want is for the USA to be like
        most south american countries. Protect the very rich no matter what and to hell with the middle class. In countries like Ecuador, there is no middle class, just a very few rich and millions of very very poor.

        Rush Limbaugh is the biggest fat ass there is. He swears he is patriotic.From what I have seen he is the most treasonist person I have seen. He will twist any story or any fact to fit his warped sense of how things work, all to keep bringing money into his own pocket. Don't ever forget, that is his whole soul purpose. The best way to take him is to realize that the truth is exactly the opposite of what he proclaims.

        The Republican party had best get their act together and recognize that in order to fix the fiscal quandry we are in from the previous president's credit card wars and credit card taxbreaks for the rich is to judiciously cut spending and at the same time increase revenues by taxing those who can most afford it. The tea baggers and their extremism is on the verge of their own self-destruction taking the grand old party of Abe Lincoln with it unless repubs wake up. And don't give me this crap that I've heard now since the Reagan years that the 'rich' create jobs. They don't create a damn thing. Only we the people with our market demands for goods and services CREATE JOBS.
        Demand for goods and services only come from the masses when they have money to spend.

        Blabb radio needs to take a hard look at China. China invested a far higher precentage of their GDP into a GOVERNMENT stimulus program to jump start their economy out of the recent past recession with great success. ... did you get that .. .COMMUNIST CHINA has beat the so-called 'free market' economies of the western world in getting out of the recession.

        Last but not least tax revenues in the USA are currently less of a percentage of GDP than they have been for the past SIXTY YEARS!!! Get it, you have to go back to 1951 to reach a time when tax revenues in the united states took such a small percentage of GDP.
        WAke up republicans, YOU have to get off your 'no tax' pledge to fix the current problems.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MiddleAmerica (July 01, 2011 3:06 am ET)
          9
        "He!! yes, it's class warfare" - Agree. I hope Obama grows a backbone and fights for this.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (July 01, 2011 11:55 am ET)
          3  
          middleMORON

          I hope you grow a brain some day and realize how STUPID you are. What a useful idiot. I am pretty sure Obama knows better than to make the suck up to the rich argument that YOU were brainwashed with
          Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (July 01, 2011 11:55 am ET)
          1  
          middleMORON

          I hope you grow a brain some day and realize how STUPID you are. What a useful idiot. I am pretty sure Obama knows better than to make the suck up to the rich argument that YOU were brainwashed with
          Report Abuse
        • Author by highlyunlikely (July 01, 2011 12:13 pm ET)
          5  
          this older comment features Boulder still trying to play liberal which he can always blame on sarcasm when he fails.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (July 01, 2011 12:19 pm ET)
          1  
          middleMORON

          I hope you grow a brain some day and realize how STUPID you are. What a useful idiot. I am pretty sure Obama knows better than to make the suck up to the rich argument that YOU were brainwashed with
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Pilot1 (July 03, 2011 1:16 pm ET)
            2
          You can never put "Obama" and "backbone" in the same sentence. He is spineless!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 01, 2011 11:48 am ET)
        7  
        I know! I heard this on NPR this morning and I would have LMAO if I didn't know there were millions of morons out there AGREEING WITH HIM!

        Middle class people supporting these rich bastard's luxurious lifestyles while they exploit their labor force and puch the tax burden back onto the middle class?

        GOOD OLD, ALL-AMERICAN CAPITALISM.

        Pointing that out?

        CLASS WARFARE

        Screw these bastards. The benefits of their success tsopped accruing to the rest of the coutry back with Ronald W. Reagan. They've betrayed they American Workforce, abandodned their responsibilities to the American Economy, and are in outright revolt against any part of the Government they can't buy.

        There isn't much that's wrong with this country that can't be 99% fixed by eliminating corporatism.

        ---------------------------------------
        IMHO
        UTOPIA
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Invent a Scandal (June 30, 2011 4:43 pm ET)
      21  
      Nailed it,
      With tax break after tax break showered on the wealthy these past 30 years (so the top 1% now receive 20% of all national income - they took home 10% of national income in 1980), did these conservative clowns ever scream class warfare?

      Hell no!! All we heard was: "on't worry, it'll trickle down."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by krelborne (June 30, 2011 4:54 pm ET)
        16  
        Yep, that's how the game is played.

        Bush gets big tax breaks for wealthy people. Ask for some of that back? CLASS WARFARE!
        The stimulus included tax breaks for jets. Want to roll back some tax breaks now? CLASS WARFARE!

        The pattern is clear.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by syrabell (June 30, 2011 4:44 pm ET)
      14  
      Wow Rush is worried that the President is using fear. Are the conservative pundits now afraid that their basic attack method is now being used against them.

      Why is it unamerican to help a fellow american? What is written on the statue of liberty, "give us your poor, your huddled masses,...'

      Are we now a country that is afraid to help one another for fear that we may lose some of what we have.

      I don't seem to hear the self made wealthy complaining, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates made their fortunes and are sharing it in philanthropic ways. The Koch brothers are using money made by their father and trying to expand their wealth by exploitation. Glenn and Rush have made their money at the expense and exploitation of others. They are the fear mongers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by krelborne (June 30, 2011 4:48 pm ET)
      19  
      RUSH: One group -- his aim is for one group of Americans to hate and despise another group.


      My irony meter exploded.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by classicliberal2 (June 30, 2011 6:43 pm ET)
        2 4
        It boggles the mind, doesn't it? Many years ago, I wrote about Limbaugh's "class war" commentary. In all that time, it hasn't changed a bit.

        ---
        Left Hook!
        http://lefthooktheblog.blogspot.com/
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Unreality (June 30, 2011 10:19 pm ET)
        4  
        See also Conrad Dobler.

        Limbaugh admired Dobler and built his radio shtick on a Dobler principle. Dobler would get between 2 guys on the opposing team and say something like, "Do you know what he said about your mother?" This resulted in arguments and dissension, which helped Dobler.

        Limbaugh built a fortune getting working class guys to think another guy (usually just another working stiff) was getting a break at his expense, causing them to argue. The politics of envy.

        Long ago Limbaugh could be heard in the SF Bay area broadcasting from Sacramento. In those days he wasn't a shill for billionaires, banksters and frauds like Ken Lay of ENRON.

        Argument was the gentle side of Dobler. He was also a dirty player.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Pilot1 (July 03, 2011 1:12 pm ET)
          2
        No one has divided a country like the liar in chief Obama!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by somnambulist (June 30, 2011 4:54 pm ET)
      12  
      Yeah. Good luck trying to convince anyone (like seriously, one single person) in the general public that corporate jets are worth a keep versus some pesky education and food programs or really anything else at all. period.

      Oil subsidies have a kinda lame passable argument on exploratory matters. Big corporations can theoretically create jobs with their billions extra. Those are at least talking points. Rather pathetic and not based in reality, but at least SOME talking point.

      Corporate jets? Yeah. Good luck on that, guys. Obama can (and should) run with that to no end. I'm actually kind of annoyed such a thing exists at all and has been left intact.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by papajohn (June 30, 2011 5:16 pm ET)
        8 2
        Obama's Comments on Corporate Jets Angers Local Leaders

        http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43585244/ns/local_news-wichita_ks/t/obamas-comment-corporate-jets-angers-local-leaders/

        Corporate Jet Expert Tells Us The Truth About Getting Rid Of That Tax Break

        http://www.businessinsider.com/what-the-corporate-jet-tax-break-really-means-2011

        Corporate Jet Tax Barely Nicks Deficit

        http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-29/jet-tax-break-cited-six-times-by-obama-would-cut-debt-by-about-3-billion.html

        FLASHBACK: AP: Stimulus includes tax break to promote private jet sales

        http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/06/flashback-ap-stimulus-includes-tax-break-promote-private-jet-sale

        The only problem is, the tax break for corporate jet owners -- they get to depreciate their purchases two years faster than commercial jet owners -- is worth about $3 billion over 10 years. During that time, the deficit is projected to be $7.2 trillion.
        http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/06/obama-targets-corporate-jets-hedge-funds-big-oil/1

        Mr Obama has latched on to the corporate tax break on jets. They get a better depreciation schedule on jets then do the airlines. He attributes this tax break as favoring corporations. He is half right.
        http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-628902?ref=feeds%2Flatest

        Do a Google search and you will see that once again MMFA is obsessing over what "Conservative Media is saying while giving a free pass to the Mainstream Media that is almost universally putting the onus on Obama for getting a "deal" with Repubicans, but none on Republicans themselves.

        Unbelievably useless.

        John
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jonimacaroni1 (June 30, 2011 6:37 pm ET)
          3 9
          You mean that Media Matters is fulfilling its mission statement, and for some reason that really irks you, huh?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by papajohn (June 30, 2011 7:09 pm ET)
            6 2
            You mean that Media Matters is fulfilling its mission statement, and for some reason that really irks you, huh?
            ---
            If you are referring to this mission statement:

            Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

            You are probably a newbee:

            Here is an archive to select from. Choose any date before 2008.
            http://web.archive.org/web/20060410075421/http://mediamatters.org/

            For example:

            http://wayback.archive.org/web/20070101000000*/http://mediamatters.org

            Conservative misinformation is and was spread throughout the entire Mainstream Media. Back then, MMFA was denied access to the Mainstream Media because they fairly exposed what they were and still are doing to spread conservative misinformation. Once MMFA let them off the hook starting ( 2008-2009) to obsess over their competitor (Fox News) they were welcome on CNN, NBC, CBS, and ABC. They sold out.

            John

            Report Abuse
          • Author by classicliberal2 (June 30, 2011 7:18 pm ET)
            2 8
            No, he means MMFA is failing to live up to its mission statement, and his criticism is dead on. MMFA's stated mission is "comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media." Most "conservative misinformation" gets to the public through the "mainstream" corporate press, not through the far right press. MMFA used to broadly cover the rest of the press, but more recently, it has become obsessively focused on the far right. This is shooting arthritic fish in a really small barrel, but, more to the point, it is giving a pass to the rest of the press. The "mainstream" press is the real problem.

            Look at what's happened today: there are probably more new items posted to this site today than on any single day in years, but they don't deal with the sorts of things papajohn lists. Instead, these new items are overwhelmingly focused on Glenn Beck, a reactionary clown and marginal freak whose show is ceasing to exist.

            ---
            Left Hook!
            http://lefthooktheblog.blogspot.com/
            Report Abuse
            • Author by highlyunlikely (June 30, 2011 7:53 pm ET)
              6 1
              Beck's a clown AND a fount of misinformation which can - and arguably has - led to attempted havoc.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Pilot1 (July 01, 2011 10:26 am ET)
            1 13
            Mission statement for MM, get the tax payers to subsidize the propaganda machine, flood the net with lies and get out the "hate America" vote!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by kabniel (July 01, 2011 11:56 am ET)
              1  
              Pilot

              You are a LIAR. You are stupid and brainwashed. STFU till you grow a brain
              Report Abuse
              • Author by datruthfarmer (July 01, 2011 12:27 pm ET)
                5  
                p 1 gets so confused. It is the people who run outfits like Crossroads GPS that
                flood the net with lies and get out the "hate America" vote!
                .
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Pilot1 (July 03, 2011 1:06 pm ET)
                  2
                I have more brains than you liberal lemmings can even imagine! Time for you to follow your mentor Obama over the economic cliff!
                Report Abuse
    • Author by ONOMATOPOEIA (June 30, 2011 5:01 pm ET)
      8  
      Pssst... if you want to find the real victims of class warfare, look at the unprecedented wealth gap. Obama didn't start class warfare. He simply acknowledged that it has been happening. Ignoring it doesn't make it go away.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (June 30, 2011 5:04 pm ET)
      5  
      The funny thing about Fox complaining about class warfare is that we're talking about the uber rich of the United States. Guess who else thinks that the uber rich of our country aren't paying enough and get way too many breaks?

      That would be a vast majority of this country.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Pilot1 (July 01, 2011 10:28 am ET)
          8
        Honk if I am paying you mortgage !
        Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (July 01, 2011 11:58 am ET)
          2  
          Pilot

          Moron. You arent paying jack. I most likely put out more in TIPS than you pay in taxes
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Pilot1 (July 03, 2011 12:39 pm ET)
              1
            I pay More in taxes in a year than most make in year I am a capitalist!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by highlyunlikely (July 01, 2011 12:12 pm ET)
          4  
          now I KNOW pilot's being illiterate on purpose.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Pilot1 (July 01, 2011 8:17 pm ET)
          5
        Talk about class warfare, who do you think provides the jobs? The Rich do, so you want to drive them out to? California was the 7th largest economy in the world until the liberals took over and destroyed the state!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Johaely (July 01, 2011 9:31 pm ET)
          2  
          The Rich do, so you want to drive them out to?


          No they don't. Otherwise, why haven't they been doing that since 2000 when the tax cuts were made?

          California was the 7th largest economy in the world until the liberals took over and destroyed the state!


          OMG California is now the 8th largest economy in the world and its the fault of those libs like Schwarzenegger.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Pilot1 (July 03, 2011 12:44 pm ET)
              1
            California is bankrupt, people are leaving in droves for Texas where a conservative is creating jobs. Ca is being destroyed by the liberal job killing fools!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by kabniel (July 02, 2011 1:23 pm ET)
          3  
          pilot

          You are a LIAR and incredibly stupid. First Californias economy is STILL the 8th largest in the world. Second it GOT that way through liberal policies. Cal has been a liberals state since at least the thirties. They almost elected an outright SOCIALIST as governor Upton Sinclair. They had Two Governor Browns both liberals. Dems have controlled the state houses since forever, we have had two Dem Senators for decades. My GOD but you are too stupid to be communicated with.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (June 30, 2011 5:10 pm ET)
      8  
      So Red State America is concerned about this because they think preserving tax breaks on corporate jets means, what... more jobs?

      Can someone help me understand why average-income Americans need to worry about this?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ThomasJH268 (June 30, 2011 5:22 pm ET)
      6  
      It's just sickening to think that the last time taxes were adjusted for the top 2% they were lowered from 38% to 35% and they worked so well (for the top 2%) that they want to lower them even further by cutting trust funds that are empty due to the republicans dipping into them from 1994 to 2006 to keep the budget balanced
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (July 01, 2011 3:43 pm ET)
           
        And, if the Bush tax cuts were allowed to expire, we'd see an increase in revenue of $4 trillion over the next 10 years.

        Why do the nutjobs hate reducing the deficit so much?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Virgil_Kane (June 30, 2011 6:45 pm ET)
      1 1
      Equalize outcomes...d@mn straight! For too long has corporate America sucked the blood from the working poor.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by gayinmt (June 30, 2011 6:49 pm ET)
      4  
      "Once again, yesterday, Barack Obama showed his sheer, unadulterated disgust for the wealthy, the successful, and anyone who's ever tried to do anything with their life here in America."

      Of all the ridiculous ironies in this article, this one stuck out at me the most. I would say becoming an attorney, a senator and the effing President of the United States of America is a pretty good example of somebody that tried to do something with their life and became successful. They do also realize that the Obamas would fit into the bracket of those that will pay higher taxes, don't they? These people have gone straight from ridiculous speed to ludicrous speed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by classicliberal2 (June 30, 2011 7:01 pm ET)
      5  
      Wealth concentration, which was flat or declining since the Great Depression, began to rise again in the mid-'70s and accelerated like mad from the '80s forward in reaction to various policy changes. Wealth in the U.S. is now more concentrated than at any time since the Gilded Age. Various methods of measuring wealth differ slightly, but they all agree on that. Going by the figures developed by Edward Wolff at New York University (who has worked on this longer than anyone), the top 20% of Americans, as of 2007, own an incredible 85.1% of the wealth in the U.S. When it comes to total financial wealth, the top 20% has an even more incredible 94% of it. It's nearly three times more concentrated now than in the 1970s. That trend, if it isn't arrested, is the end of the good ol' U.S. of A. Joseph Stiglitz recently authored a piece for Vanity Fair about the incredibly destructive consequences of it:
      http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105
      For our purposes here, though, this sorry state of affairs is merely the context for what Republicans have adopted; the ever-festering sore they propose to "treat" by making infinitely worse. In the up-is-down, black-is-white world of Bubble People "conservatism," this "treatment" is not to be labeled "class warfare." Standing against it is what gets one so designated.

      It's that selective "conservative" use of the concept of "class warfare." Nearly every congressional Republican has just voted for the Ryan plan. This makes the Bush tax cuts permanent, then brings in a whole slew of new tax cuts for the rich on top of them, including eliminating taxes on interest, dividends, and capital gains (capital gains alone make up 75% of the taxable, non-sheltered income of the wealthy per year), reduces the top income tax rate from 35% to 25% (lower than it has been since prior to the Great Depression), maintains various huge tax loopholes for corporations (including $40 billion/year for Big Oil), and so on. Over $4 trillion in cuts, nearly all of them going to the wealthy. At the same time, the Ryan plan eviscerates Medicare, and slashes spending on various other programs--all together, nearly 2/3 of the cuts it would enact are to programs that help the poor and eldery (mostly Medicare).

      This--genuine, raw, nowhere-to-run-or-hide class warfare, by any serious definition--is not what is contemplated by conservatives when they use the phrase "class warfare."

      ---
      Left Hook
      http://lefthooktheblog.blogspot.com/
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (June 30, 2011 7:46 pm ET)
      5  
      The real class warfare is the rich fomenting internecine battles between different segments of the Middle Class (private vs. public sector employees).

      Get the Middle Class fighting each other over scraps while wealthy siphon more and more money to their pockets.

      Laughing all the way to the bank never applied more than now.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (June 30, 2011 7:57 pm ET)
      2 5
      Let's see. Eliminating a tax break that will bring in probably $10 Billion over a decade is a huge boost to the budget, but eliminating $50 billion a year from the budget is such a miniscule amount that it's not worth going after.
      Let's eliminate all the "Bush" tax cuts and add about $3 Trillion over the decade, plus $500 Billion in cuts and see where we are.
      Some of us remember when Reagan agreed to a tax increase in the 80s with the "promise" from Congress to cut the budget about $2 for every $1 increase in revenue. Only the revenue side of that equation was ever enforced and I'll leave it to all to guess which side that was.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (June 30, 2011 8:00 pm ET)
        6  
        "Only the revenue side of that equation was ever enforced and I'll leave it to all to guess which side that was."
        Umm... the revenue side? <J/K>
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NotSure8 (July 01, 2011 1:34 pm ET)
           
        Obama has already announced a drawdown of troops in Afghanistan. That should provide quite a bit of savings - more even than you are asking for.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (June 30, 2011 8:01 pm ET)
      4 1
      My takeaway from this is actually surprise. I'm surprised that whoever issued this talking point about class warfare doesn't think that anyone will notice when suddenly the same, almost the identical, talking point magically appears on so many different lips.

      Is that you, Luntz? Perhaps Ailes? Perhaps Murdoch? Doesn't matter. You've sort of tipped your hand here, showing just how much media is actually under your control, and you've also provided evidence that at least some of the media in this country is all guided by the same mind.

      Less surprising is how few in the supposedly liberal media are willing to point out that, yes the corporate share of income tax is way down, and yes the share the wealthy pay is also way down. If you're rich, it's time to pay up after 30 years of graft. Too bad, so sad.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by right ON (June 30, 2011 8:13 pm ET)
      6 2
      It may be class warfare, but ask yourself "Who fired the first shot?".

      Throughout 99.99% of human history, poor people have had the jackboot of rich folk on their neck. Through the miracle of democracy, the poor and middle class now have the power to enact policy to shift the power imbalance back. You can call it class warfare, if that floats your boat. I'll just call it what it is: payback.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (July 01, 2011 10:59 am ET)
         
      Wasn't Lou Dobbs on the economic left-of-center only a few years ago?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by highlyunlikely (July 01, 2011 11:41 am ET)
        1  
        not sure, but as far back as I remember him he was always a pompous aristocrat.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Vesus (July 01, 2011 1:08 pm ET)
         
      If tax breaks for the rich are ok, why don't we have 100% tax break on the poor and middle class? Then these fools will have to be silent about it, or else it's "class warfare".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Nikkiru (July 01, 2011 5:00 pm ET)
         
      So after doing their damndest to impoverish the middle class, and dismantle the social safety net for the poor, they whine "class warfare" when it gets pointed out who really benefits from their machinations?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by John Puma (July 02, 2011 8:21 am ET)
         
      I repeat, aren't these the same folks who INSIST we are a classless society?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Laura Schneider (July 02, 2011 11:10 am ET)
         
      It's not class warfare; it's fact. And, let's face it, facts are not the stuff of which right-wingnuts often partake.

      The media is composed mostly of highly paid (millionaires) and owned by even more highly paid (billionaires) who want to protect their tax cuts and lifestyle while asking us to give up life-saving medical care, food, shelter, transportation, etc.

      They talk about priorities, but it's clear their priorities are protecting themselves and their bank accounts at our expense.

      Who's really conducting class warfare?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Defender of Freedom (July 03, 2011 12:46 pm ET)
         
      Lets face reality people the two main political parties in this country want the American people fighting amongst ourselves, "when the cat is away the mice (in this case rats ) will play." As long as we fight among ourselves we are not watching them as closely as we should.The problems facing our great nation are not what Glenn Beck , Rush, and Randi Rhodes are saying, the problems are things like our elected officials spending way too much of our money on programs to give to us to get reelected,and no one governing with common sense or listening to "WE THE PEOPLE" anymore. On this the day before we all celebrate our Independence from a tyrannical government.We should all come together again against a tyrannical government and take back the U.S.A for "WE THE PEOPLE"
      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.