J. Christian Adams claimed the Justice Department's decision to dismiss a voter registration lawsuit against Missouri demonstrates the Obama administration's "record" of hostility to voting laws. In fact, the highly controversial Bush-era case has been connected to the politicization of the Justice Department and the U.S. attorneys scandal, and was dismissed due to outdated evidence.
The trumped-up allegations that the Obama Justice Department engaged in racially charged "corruption" in its handling of the New Black Panther Party case jumped from Fox News to CNN this morning. Anchor Kyra Phillips hosted Republican activist J. Christian Adams, whom she referred to as a "whistleblower," to repeat his unsubstantiated accusations, which are based on hearsay and charges made by other people.
One of the on-screen graphics described Adams' allegations as "Voter intimidation scandal at Justice Dept.":
During the segment, Phillips discussed the Commission on Civil Rights' investigation into the case with Ashley L. Taylor Jr., a Republican member of the commission. Phillips said that the investigation has "divided" the commission and that two commissioners were Democrats. She then read a portion of a statement from Michael Yaki, a Democratic member of commission, that criticized the commission's months-long investigation as "incredibly shallow," "partisan," and "a one-sided farce."
But Yaki isn't the only member of the commission to criticize its investigation -- Abigail Thernstrom, the Republican vice chair of the panel, has done the same.
Michael Yaki, a Democratic member of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, has released a statement criticizing the "far-right majority" on the Commission for scheduling the testimony of right-wing activist J. Christian Adams at a time when commissioners critical of the manufactured controversy surrounding the New Black Panthers Party case -- including Republican vice chairwoman Abigail Thernstrom -- could not attend. Yaki called the investigation into the case "shallow, expensive, and partisan" and "reminiscent of an inquisition, a star chamber, and a witch hunt."
Yesterday, Thernstrom encouraged readers to "forget about the New Black Panther Party case," which she called "small potatoes, commenting that "too much overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges has been devoted to this case." Yet right-wing media continue to promote the phony allegations.
Read Commissioner Yaki's full statement after the jump:
Right-wing media continued trumpeting completely unsubstantiated allegations that the Department of Justice -- and Attorney General Eric Holder specifically -- dismissed voter-intimidation charges against members of the New Black Panther Party because the defendants were African-American. In fact, Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez testified that the charges were dropped after attorneys at the Civil Rights Division determined that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute the three defendants.
J. Christian Adams' accusations that President Obama's Justice Department engaged in racially charged "corruption" in the New Black Panther Party case do not stand up to the evidence. Adams is a right-wing activist tied to the Bush-era politicization of the Justice Department who has admitted he lacks first-hand knowledge of the events he is discussing, and his claims fall apart given the fact that the Obama DOJ obtained judgment against one defendant, while the Bush DOJ declined to pursue similar allegations in 2006.
Taking subterfuge to a new level, Fox News this morning hosted Dana Perino to promote the right-wing hatchet job against the Obama Justice Department with a straight-faced denial that nothing similar happened during the Bush administration. It did. And while she worked there.
To review, right-wing media have taken the lead of GOP activist and "exhibit A" of the politicized Bush DOJ, J. Christian Adams, to accuse President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder of racially charged corruption tied to the Justice Department's decision not to pursue additional charges against members of the New Black Panther Party for allegedly intimidating voters outside a Philadelphia polling center in 2008. After the Bush administration chose not to pursue criminal charges against the party, its leader and the two members standing outside the polling center, the Obama administration's Justice Department successfully obtained civil judgment against Samir Shabazz for carrying a weapon outside the polling center while withdrawing civil charges against the other three parties.
Despite this fact -- which is not in dispute -- Fox News continues to dishonestly present Adams' specious case as if it's in any way plausible. Perino, for her part, synopsized Adams' allegations and philosophized:
PERINO: I don't know if we'll ever find out the truth. I know that if I -- when I was press secretary, and the situation had been reversed -- I definitely would have been asked if the White House knew about it. Or at least what the White House thought about it, because what we should get now from the Justice Department is at least some sort of an explanation as to why they thought it wasn't a good case.
Apparently no one will "find out the truth" watching this channel. More after the jump.
Fox News' Special Report highlighted a U.S. Commission on Civil Rights commissioner's support of an investigation into the Justice Department's handling of a case involving the New Black Panthers hearing. But Special Report ignored the commission's Republican vice-chair's suggestion to "forget about" the case, calling it "small potatoes."
Megyn Kelly falsely characterized a documentary about the New Black Panther Party as evidence of "the incident" that gave rise to a Justice Department investigation into alleged voter intimidation on Election Day 2008. But according to the general counsel for the Civil Rights Commission, the video was completed before Election Day.
As viewers watch Fox News dishonestly hype GOP activist J. Christian Adams' unsubstantiated accusation that the Justice Department under president Obama engaged in racially charged corruption, they should know that Adams reportedly was hired by Bradley Schlozman, a Bush-era political appointee who was found to have inappropriately considered political affiliation when hiring career attorneys.
A post today on the legal news website Main Justice reported that Joseph Rich, the former chief of the Civil Rights Division's Voting Section, confirmed that Adams was hired by "Bradley Schlozman, who was then a deputy assistant attorney general and later became acting assistant attorney general of the Civil Rights Division." Rich reportedly called Adams "exhibit A of the type of people hired by Bradley Schlozman."
A July 2008 report from the Department of Justice Inspector General's Office and the Office of Professional Responsibility concluded that Schlozman "considered political and ideological affiliations when hiring and taking other personnel actions relating to career attorneys in violation of Department policy and federal law." The report also concluded:
The evidence in our investigation showed that Schlozman, first as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General and subsequently as Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General and Acting Assistant Attorney General, considered political and ideological affiliations in hiring career attorneys and in other personnel actions affecting career attorneys in the Civil Rights Division. In doing so, he violated federal law -- the Civil Service Reform Act -- and Department policy that prohibit discrimination in federal employment based on political and ideological affiliations, and committed misconduct. The evidence also showed that Division managers failed to exercise sufficient oversight to ensure that Schlozman did not engage in inappropriate hiring and personnel practices. Moreover, Schlozman made false statements about whether he considered political and ideological affiliations when he gave sworn testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee and in his written responses to supplemental questions from the Committee.
In a National Review Online article, Abigail Thernstrom, the Republican vice-chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, called the manufactured controversy surrounding the New Black Panthers Party case "small potatoes," and encouraged readers to "forget about the New Black Panther Party case," commenting that "too much overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges has been devoted to this case." Thernstrom, an adjunct scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and former senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, further wrote:
Thomas Perez, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, makes a perfectly plausible argument: Different lawyers read this barely litigated statutory provision differently. It happens all the time, especially when administrations change in the middle of litigation.
As Media Matters documented, Thernstrom criticized the commission's investigation into the New Black Panther Party case in April, saying, "I do not think that this inquiry has served the interests of the Commission as being a bipartisan watchdog for important civil rights violations, and I do not believe it has served well the party to which I belong."
The conservative media -- led by Fox News -- continue to dishonestly hype the accusations and pressure other media outlets to cover the ginned up controversy. Thernstrom provides yet another reason to ignore the noise machine.
From Thernstrom's July 6 National Review article:
Forget about the New Black Panther Party case; it is very small potatoes. Perhaps the Panthers should have been prosecuted under section 11 (b) of the Voting Rights Act for their actions of November 2008, but the legal standards that must be met to prove voter intimidation -- the charge -- are very high.
In the 45 years since the act was passed, there have been a total of three successful prosecutions. The incident involved only three Panthers at a single majority-black precinct in Philadelphia. So far -- after months of hearings, testimony and investigation -- no one has produced actual evidence that any voters were too scared to cast their ballots. Too much overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges has been devoted to this case.
A number of conservatives have charged that the Philadelphia Black Panther decision demonstrates that attorneys in the Civil Rights Division have racial double standards. How many attorneys in what positions? A pervasive culture that affected the handling of this case? No direct quotations or other evidence substantiate the charge.
Thomas Perez, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, makes a perfectly plausible argument: Different lawyers read this barely litigated statutory provision differently. It happens all the time, especially when administrations change in the middle of litigation. Democrats and Republicans seldom agree on how best to enforce civil-rights statutes; this is not the first instance of a war between Left and Right within the Civil Rights Division.
Fox News correspondent Shannon Bream falsely claimed that the Justice Department withdrew all charges against members of the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation and deceptively quoted Thomas Perez's, assistant attorney general for the civil rights division, testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights to support her falsehood. Bream's report -- the second time in a week that Fox News has dishonestly presented Perez's testimony -- fits Fox News' alarming pattern of omitting facts and falsifying the record while promoting J. Christian Adams' political advocacy.
Once again promoting Adams' accusations, Bream claimed:
BREAM: This all stems from that incident in November of 2008 when some members of the Black Panther Party were accused of intimidating voters and poll workers at a Philadelphia polling place. The Department of Justice got involved, there was an investigation that was launched. They did win a default judgment against several of the members when they didn't show up in April 2009 at a court hearing.
Since that time, other attorneys from within the department have said -- you know the Justice Department ultimately dropped the cases, dismissed the charges against those individuals, and some within the department, including Christian Adams, say there are politics at play.
Bream's report is just false. The Justice Department obtained default judgment in May against Minister King Samir Shabazz, who was carrying a nightstick outside a Philadelphia polling station. The fact that the DOJ successfully pursued default judgment against Shabazz for his role in the incident effectively ends the discussion as to whether the Obama administration is hostile to prosecuting black defendants, as Adams has claimed.
But Bream's deception was not limited to omission. More after the Jump.
As Fox News continues to dishonestly hype GOP activist J. Christian Adams' hearsay-laden accusation that President Obama's Justice Department is guilty of racially charged corruption, information continues to emerge that submarines his credibility to discuss why the Justice Department chose to obtain judgment against a member of the New Black Panther Party for carrying a weapon outside a Philadelphia polling station in 2008, while not pursuing charges against additional members of the party not accused of carrying weapons. According to Abigail Thernstrom, Republican vice chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Adams "doesn't know why the decision was made."
From the July 5 edition of Fox News' America Live:
Loading the player reg...
In aggressively promoting GOP activist J. Christian Adams' unsubstantiated allegations that the Department of Justice and Attorney General Eric Holder engaged in racially motivated corruption by not pursuing additional voter intimidation charges against members of the New Black Panther Party, Fox News has routinely omitted key facts that completely undermine Adams' claims. Now Fox News is misidentifying a McCain campaign volunteer in order to lend Adams credibility.
Adams is scheduled to testify before the Civil Rights Commission tomorrow. In advance of his testimony, Fox News has hyped Adams' assertion that the Obama administration has a "hostility in the voting section and in the civil rights division to bringing cases on behalf of white victims for the benefit of national racial minorities." Despite the fact that Adams himself acknowledged during his Fox interview that his claims are based on hearsay, Fox continues to treat them as credible. Increasingly, Fox News is misrepresenting the record to advance the story.
Fox, for example, has refused to report that the Bush-era Justice Department chose not to pursue voter intimidation charges against members of the Minutemen in Arizona, one of whom allegedly carried a handgun while harassing Hispanic voters in 2006. This fact effectively destroys the idea that the Obama DOJ engaged in racially charged corruption that is unprecedented. Quite simply, the Obama administration's Justice Department pursued voter intimidation charges against a black individual carrying a weapon outside a polling station -- they obtained default judgment in May against Minister King Samir Shabazz, who was carrying a nightstick outside a Philadelphia polling station -- whereas the Bush administration DOJ did not pursue voter intimidation charges against a member of the Minutemen who allegedly carried a pistol outside a polling station. Fox News simply refuses to disclose this key fact that -- again -- absolutely annihilates Adams' very accusation that the Justice Department is hostile to pursuing voter intimidation charges against black defendants.
But it seems now that withholding facts is insufficient.
Fox News continues to omit evidence while advancing GOP activist J. Christian Adams' accusations that the Justice Department engaged in unprecedented and racially charged corruption by not pursuing additional charges of voter intimidation against members of the New Black Panther Party. In fact, no voters have said they were intimidated, and the Bush-era DOJ chose not to pursue charges in a similar case.