<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Access to Abortion</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/access_to_abortion</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Access to Abortion</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Gannett, AP claimed McCain opposes a constitutional amendment banning abortion -- but McCain said he supports it  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090011</link>
<description>In recent comparisons of Barack Obama&#x27;s and John McCain&#x27;s positions, Gannett News Service and the Associated Press claimed that McCain opposes a constitutional amendment banning abortion. However, McCain has previously asserted that he supports such an amendment, and McCain advisers have reportedly said that he would not try to change the Republican Party&#x27;s platform on abortion, which in 2004 called for a constitutional ban on abortion.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090011</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:22:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s  King reported  social conservative  support for Thompson, but not his inconsistent abortion  stance</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707260009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707260009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:51:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Following a pattern, CNN&#x27;s John King equated &#x22;mixing God and politics&#x22; and opposition to abortion rights</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:16:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; uncritically report Giuliani assertion that 2003 and 1997 abortion ban exceptions were substantively different</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:00:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox News, Barnes and Kondracke failed to note McCain&#x27;s shifting statements on abortion</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611270007</link>
<description>While
discussing potential candidates for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, Fred Barnes and Morton Kondracke mentioned Sen. John
McCain&#x27;s views on abortion
rights, but did not note his apparently inconsistent statements. Neither Barnes nor Kondracke mentioned that McCain told reporters in 1999 that he would &#x22;not support
repeal of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe v. Wade&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x22; or that McCain later issued a &#x22;clarification&#x22; saying
he &#x22;would work toward its repeal.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611270007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:49:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ignored McCain&#x27;s inconsistency on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe v. Wade&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, same-sex civil unions</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611220001</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;
article that noted Sen.
John McCain&#x27;s recent statement that &#x22;he
thought Roe v. Wade ...
should be overturned&#x22; did not
mention that McCain
has voiced several inconsistent positions on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe
v. Wade&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; also wrote that McCain
&#x22;seemed to countenance
civil unions&#x22;; in fact, McCain
offered two apparently contradictory positions on civil unions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611220001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:23:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly falsely claimed that a pregnant woman&#x27;s life could &#x22;never&#x22; be &#x22;in danger&#x22; from pregnancy complication</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610160007</link>
<description>On his radio show, Bill O&#x27;Reilly falsely claimed that it &#x22;is never the case&#x22; that a &#x22;mother&#x27;s life is in danger&#x22; during pregnancy because &#x22;you can always have a C-section and do those kinds of things.&#x22; In fact, several potential pregnancy complications, such as an ectopic pregnancy, which is &#x22;the leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the first trimester&#x22; or preeclampsia, which &#x22;affect[s] up to one in seven pregnant women&#x22; can threaten the life of a pregnant woman.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610160007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:35:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Coulter &#x22;in awe [sic] of the voters of South Carolina [sic]&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607280008</link>
<description>In addition to calling Al Gore a &#x22;total fag&#x22; on the July 27 edition of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Ann Coulter also falsely credited activists who oppose abortion rights with placing an abortion ban on the ballot in South Carolina. In fact, it was supporters of abortion rights in South Dakota who placed a measure on the November ballot that would allow voters to uphold or strike down a state law banning most abortions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607280008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:27:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews accused Sen. Clinton of taking &#x22;poll-tested path&#x22; and &#x22;trying to play it safe&#x22; on abortion</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604240010</link>
<description>Playing a clip of a 2005 speech in which Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said abortion should be &#x22;safe, legal, and rare,&#x22; Chris Matthews suggested that she was being disingenuous and accused her of &#x22;trying to play it safe&#x22; on the issue in order to follow the &#x22;same poll-tested path&#x22; in 2008 as previous Democratic presidential nominees during failed bids for the White House. But Matthews offered no support for his suggestion that Clinton&#x27;s 2005 statement on abortion was disingenuous, nor did he mention that she used exactly those words in describing her views on abortion in 1999.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604240010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:19:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck: S.D. Native Americans &#x22;have found something that can be more profitable than casinos, and that&#x27;s abortion clinics&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604060004</link>
<description>On his nationally syndicated radio program, Glenn Beck said of Native Americans who are considering circumventing a new South Dakota law banning nearly all abortions by opening an abortion clinic on an Indian reservation in the state: &#x22;Indians will have found something that can be more profitable than casinos, and that&#x27;s abortion clinics. And then, look out, man -- exploiting everything illegal for profit.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604060004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Apr 2006 17:00:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Matthews misrepresented Mass. Democratic gubernatorial candidate&#x27;s position on parental consent</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603130013</link>
<description>During a conversation about the potential presidential candidacy of Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, MSNBC&#x27;s Chris Matthews misrepresented the position of Shannon O&#x27;Brien, Romney&#x27;s Democratic opponent in the 2002 gubernatorial election, on parental consent requirements for pregnant teenagers seeking an abortion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603130013</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:11:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;L.A. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Matthews misrepresented Bush, McCain positions on S. Dakota abortion ban</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603090010</link>
<description>An editorial in the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; misrepresented the position of President Bush on a South Dakota law banning all abortions except in cases in which a woman&#x27;s life is threatened by a pregnancy. MSNBC host Chris Matthews also misstated Sen. John McCain&#x27;s position on the bill.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603090010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:45:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E; mischaracterized Alito&#x27;s expressed views on abortion rights</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603090009</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on the constitutionality of South Dakota&#x27;s recently passed abortion ban stated that Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito &#x22;expressed skepticism about abortion rights while working for the Reagan administration.&#x22; However, the suggestion that Alito merely &#x22;expressed skepticism&#x22; about abortion rights mischaracterizes his clearly articulated view that there is no constitutional right to abortion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603090009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:26:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Family Research Council&#x27;s Perkins claimed &#x22;the majority of Americans identify themselves as pro-life&#x22;; polls show otherwise</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603080006</link>
<description>On MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council claimed that &#x22;the majority of Americans identify themselves as pro-life,&#x22; even though recent polls show otherwise.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603080006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:54:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Napolitano misrepresented legal issue at stake in abortion case before Supreme Court</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200512010002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200512010002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:38:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>