<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Amy Robach</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/amy_robach</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Amy Robach</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Some MSNBC journalists identify a media double standard in coverage of McCain gaffe; others demonstrate it  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200011</link>
<description>After Chuck Todd acknowledged a media double standard in coverage of Sen. John McCain&#x27;s Al Qaeda-Iran gaffe, CNBC&#x27;s John Harwood asserted on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;I think that at the end of the day, John McCain has got sufficient credibility on that issue that people are not going to look at that and say, &#x27;Oh, John McCain is confused&#x27; or &#x27;John McCain&#x27;s too old&#x27; or &#x27;John McCain doesn&#x27;t get it.&#x27; ... But he obviously can&#x27;t do that too many times or he&#x27;s got a problem.&#x22; Harwood was not alone in misrepresenting or excusing McCain&#x27;s false claim on MSNBC; several MSNBC reporters and anchors have ignored or excused McCain&#x27;s false claim.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:01:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Robach, Witt aired McCain ad attacking &#x22;Woodstock  Concert Museum&#x22; earmark, but didn&#x27;t note his missed vote  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170008</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Amy Robach and Alex Witt separately aired a campaign ad from Republican presidential candidate John McCain attacking Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s support for a $1 million earmark for a museum at the site of the 1969 Woodstock Festival in New   York. But Robach, Witt, NBC News White House correspondent Kelly O&#x27;Donnell and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Congressional Quarterly&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jonathan Allen all failed to note that McCain had skipped the vote on removing the earmark. Robach and Witt also falsely referred to the advertisement as &#x22;new.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:33:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC silent so far on Carlson comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708300002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708300002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:41:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re-airing Abrams/Carlson segment, MSNBC left out part where Carlson admitted assault</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:06:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Robach compared pro-Obama 527 with discredited Swift Vets group</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706220008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706220008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:29:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RNC&#x27;s Obama attack sheet &#x22;not surprising&#x22; and &#x22;a bit of a stretch&#x22; -- but still news to &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, MSNBC</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100025</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100025</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:54:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite reports to the contrary, MSNBC persisted in linking Clinton postponement to Obama</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701160008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701160008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:26:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite lack of timetable, media persist in calling Bush&#x27;s troop increase a &#x22;surge&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110013</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:56:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC: When will media &#x22;honeymoon&#x22; with possibly &#x22;overrated&#x22; Obama end?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612180005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC News
Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Amy Robach asked if the purported &#x22;honeymoon&#x22; Sen.
Barack Obama is enjoying with the media would &#x22;officially [be] over when
he officially enters the [2008 presidential] race.&#x22; While Robach did not
comment on MSNBC&#x27;s coverage of Obama during this purported
&#x22;honeymoon&#x22; period, MSNBC hosts and guests have highlighted
Obama&#x27;s middle name and mocked his purported sensitivity to comments
about his ears.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612180005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:51:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media suggested conservative Christians are particularly outraged by Foley scandal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090008</link>
<description>In their coverage of the Foley scandal&#x27;s political effects, numerous media figures have suggested that conservative Christians are most likely to react negatively to the Foley scandal. In doing so, they presume that so-called &#x22;values voters&#x22; are more concerned than others with protecting children.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:37:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, and NBC touted &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/Gallup poll with Bush approval rating at 44 percent, ignored earlier Pew poll placing his approval at 37 percent</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609210003</link>
<description>Many television news outlets touted a &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/Gallup poll putting President Bush&#x27;s job approval rating at 44 percent as a success for Bush, asserting that his rating is &#x22;the highest it&#x27;s been in a year.&#x22; But four days earlier, the same news organizations ignored a Pew Research  Center poll showing Bush&#x27;s approval rating at 37 percent.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609210003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:26:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC hyped Coulter interview in which she attacked Pres. Clinton as a &#x22;latent homosexual&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607260007</link>
<description>MSNBC hyped Ann Coulter&#x27;s interview with CNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Big Idea&#x3C;/em&#x3E; host Donny Deutsch, during which she said of former President Clinton: &#x22;[T]hat sort of rampant promiscuity does show some level of latent homosexuality.&#x22; The interview, characterized by MSNBC as &#x22;must-see TV,&#x22; coupled with an upcoming appearance on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball with Chris Matthews&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, will mark at least the sixth and seventh times NBC, or one of its cable news channels, has hosted Coulter since the publication of her latest book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Godless&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607260007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:07:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>