<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Anderson Cooper 360</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/anderson_cooper_360</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Anderson Cooper 360</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>  CNN has yet to note that, notwithstanding McCain&#x27;s criticism of Obama, McCain reportedly doesn&#x27;t expect Al Qaeda in Iraq would &#x22;be taking a country&#x22; if &#x22;we left&#x22; Iraq  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804230003</link>
<description>After airing several reports in February highlighting Sen. John McCain&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;if we left [Iraq], [Al Qaeda in Iraq] wouldn&#x27;t be establishing a base ... they&#x27;d be taking a country,&#x22; CNN has yet to follow up by noting that McCain reportedly does not believe that assertion. According to &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x22;[f]ew, including Mr. McCain, expect Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia [Iraq], a Sunni group, to take control of Shiite-dominated Iraq in the event of an American withdrawal.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804230003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:00:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>During CNN debate, John King falsely claimed Obama &#x22;refused&#x22; to disclose earmarks  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802220011</link>
<description>During the February 21 Democratic presidential debate, CNN&#x27;s John King cited a report stating that Sen. Barack Obama was &#x22;responsible for $91 million in earmarks&#x22; in the 2008 fiscal year, and asked Obama: &#x22;And you have refused to say where the money went, what it&#x27;s for. Why?&#x22; In fact, Obama disclosed his &#x22;earmarks&#x22; for the 2008 fiscal year in a June 2007 press release.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802220011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:37:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Foreman failed to keep McCain honest about his former opposition to the Bush tax cuts  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190003</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Tom Foreman uncritically reported Sen. John McCain&#x27;s claim that he voted against President Bush&#x27;s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts because &#x22;he wanted reductions in spending, too.&#x22; But in a 2001 floor statement explaining his opposition, McCain did not mention the absence of offsetting spending cuts; rather, he stated, &#x22;I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle class Americans who most need tax relief.&#x22; &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:35:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Foreman  falsely suggested Rangel&#x27;s attack on Obama over race issue &#x22;still being  flung&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801160011</link>
<description>In his report on a &#x22;cease-fire&#x22; between Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton  over the issue of Clinton&#x27;s recent comments on civil rights,  CNN&#x27;s Tom Foreman falsely suggested that an attack on Obama by Rep. Charlie  Rangel was &#x22;still being flung.&#x22; But Foreman did not mention that Rangel, who  asserted that the reason &#x22;race got into this thing [campaign] is because Obama  said race,&#x22; had earlier expressed &#x22;regret&#x22; for &#x22;essentially pouring gasoline on  the fire&#x22; at a time when Clinton was &#x22;essentially declaring a cease-fire,&#x22; as  Norah O&#x27;Donnell put it.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801160011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:57:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On  CNN, Donahue claimed Penn repeated &#x22;drug issue ... over and over and over&#x22; -- but  Matthews first asked about drugs</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712220004</link>
<description>Discussing controversial remarks made by a  then-co-chair of Sen. Hillary Rodham  Clinton&#x27;s presidential campaign about  Sen. Barack  Obama, Jennifer Donahue  claimed that the Clinton campaign is &#x22;playing the race card&#x22; because of &#x22;what  happened last week on the drug issue&#x22; and that Clinton&#x27;s chief strategist, Mark  Penn, &#x22;kept repeating it over and over and over.&#x22; In fact,  the entire &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E; segment on which Penn appeared  was devoted to the  controversy over the remarks about Obama&#x27;s past drug use, and Penn was not the  first to raise the drug issue.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712220004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:04:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joe  Klein: Earlier in the year, Clinton spoke &#x22;from ... her diaphragm. Now  she&#x27;s speaking much more quickly again and through her  nose&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712150001</link>
<description>On CNN, Anderson Cooper asked Joe Klein: &#x22;You actually -- you hear fear in 
Hillary Clinton&#x27;s voice?&#x22; Klein responded: &#x22;Well, it&#x27;s interesting. Earlier in 
the year when she was doing really well, she was speaking more slowly and from, 
like, her diaphragm. Now, she&#x27;s speaking much more quickly again and through her 
nose. It&#x27;s interesting.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712150001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:50:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Cooper  praised Huckabee&#x27;s failure to answer WWJD question as &#x22;probably one of the best  answers you could possibly come up to&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300003</link>
<description>During post-debate discussion of the November 28 CNN/YouTube Republican debate, 
CNN&#x27;s Anderson Cooper praised Mike Huckabee&#x27;s response to the question, &#x22;The 
death penalty: What would Jesus do?&#x22; calling Huckabee&#x27;s answer, &#x22;certainly, 
probably one of the best answers you could possibly come up to, to that 
question.&#x22; However, Huckabee, who has repeatedly invoked Jesus Christ and 
Christianity to explain his position on matters of public policy, did not answer 
the question or Cooper&#x27;s own follow-up.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:52:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Roberts  equated &#x22;Christian conservatives&#x22; with &#x22;values  voters&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Anderson&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; Cooper 360&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN&#x27;s John Roberts said of Mike Huckabee: &#x22;[H]e 
brings Christian conservatives in the door, values voters.&#x22; CNN personalities 
have repeatedly linked &#x22;values&#x22; and religious faith to conservative voters or 
politicians.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:09:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring  Obama&#x27;s actual statements, CNN and Fox News claimed Obama &#x22;waffled&#x22; on driver&#x27;s  licenses</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711160008</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Anderson Cooper and Gloria Borger, and Fox News&#x27; Megyn Kelly claimed that 
Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) &#x22;waffled&#x22; during the Democratic presidential debate on 
the issue of driver&#x27;s licenses for undocumented immigrants. In fact, Obama 
stated: &#x22;Look, I have already said, I support the notion that we have to deal 
with public safety and that driver&#x27;s licenses at the state level can make that 
happen.&#x22; When debate moderator Wolf Blitzer asked him to respond &#x22;yes or no&#x22; to 
the question, &#x22;Do you support driver&#x27;s licenses for illegal immigrants?&#x22; Obama 
answered, &#x22;Yes.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711160008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:53:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The  Iraq news blackout: how the press spent its  summer vacation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:34:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Once again, CNN  ignores questions about  timing of terror-arrest  announcement</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707200002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707200002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:41:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP, CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The State&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported McCain&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe &#x3C;/em&#x3E;comment without noting McCain&#x27;s history of flip-flopping on overturning &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702200008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702200008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:02:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media uncritically reported Bush&#x27;s statement touting Iraqi success in Najaf</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701310001</link>
<description>Numerous media outlets reported -- as President Bush
claimed in an interview on National Public Radio -- that Iraqi troops took the
lead in the battle near Najaf against religious militia the Soldiers of Heaven,
without noting that the Iraqis were reportedly &#x22;overwhelmed&#x22; until U.S.
forces joined them.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701310001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:47:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN, NBC blame Obama &#x22;opponents&#x22; for smears advanced by media</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701260014</link>
<description>Anderson Cooper, David Gregory, and
Soledad O&#x27;Brien have all asked Sen. Barack Obama about smears leveled against him,
purportedly by his political &#x22;opponents&#x22; or
&#x22;enemies.&#x22; But in each case, they did
not name any of these &#x22;opponents.&#x22; Indeed, by framing their questions in terms of
political &#x22;opponents,&#x22; they
ignored the media&#x27;s role
in promoting these smears, and in some cases originating them.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701260014</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:02:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN parroted Republican contention about &#x22;onslaught of subpoenas&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701060003</link>
<description>CNN correspondent Brian Todd warned that &#x22;an
onslaught of subpoenas&#x22; from congressional Democrats could be seen as
&#x22;payback&#x22; by voters. However, polling indicates that a majority of
the public favors oversight of certain aspects of the Bush administration.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701060003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Jan 2007 19:57:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>