<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Andrew Napolitano</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/andrew_napolitano</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Andrew Napolitano</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; baselessly claimed Bill Clinton took &#x22;a swipe at John McCain,&#x22; falsely suggested his and Clark&#x27;s comments part of Obama attack strategy  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080006</link>
<description>Three &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-hosts repeatedly asserted that former President Bill Clinton recently &#x22;attack[ed]&#x22; Sen. John McCain&#x27;s &#x22;selfless heroism at the Hanoi Hilton,&#x22; in Andrew Napolitano&#x27;s words, and two of the hosts -- Napolitano and Gretchen Carlson -- falsely suggested that Clinton&#x27;s statement and recent comments by retired Gen. Wesley Clark were part of a coordinated effort by Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s campaign to &#x22;attack&#x22; McCain&#x27;s service. But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-hosts provided no evidence that Clinton&#x27;s comments were intended to refer to McCain; nor did they provide the context of those remarks.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:54:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox, Napolitano claimed McCain &#x22;for his whole career, has tried to stay above this kind of a fray&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804240007</link>
<description>Discussing an attack ad on Sen. Barack Obama that Sen. John McCain has denounced, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-host Andrew Napolitano asserted: &#x22;John McCain, for his whole career, has tried to stay above this kind of a fray. Why should he change now?&#x22; Napolitano did not point out that this is the latest example of a pattern in which McCain denounces smears against his opponents, while also benefiting from them. Moreover, in asserting that McCain has &#x22;tried to stay above this kind of a fray,&#x22; Napolitano seemingly ignored several instances in which McCain has misrepresented the statements or positions of his opponents.     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804240007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:08:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing Malkin&#x27;s blog, Gibson and Napolitano lamented VA Tech ban on handguns</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704170001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704170001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:37:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters &#x3C;/em&#x3E;CIA leak case &#x22;dishonor&#x22; roll</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060017</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:18:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Napolitano made the false -- and absurd -- claim that Wilson listed Plame&#x27;s CIA employment in &#x3C;em&#x3E;Who&#x27;s Who&#x3C;/em&#x3E; entry</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607130005</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; Andrew P. Napolitano claimed that former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV &#x22;told &#x3C;em&#x3E;Who&#x27;s Who in America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; to put that his wife was a CIA operative.&#x22; In fact, Wilson&#x27;s entry in &#x3C;em&#x3E;Who&#x27;s Who&#x3C;/em&#x3E; mentioned his wife&#x27;s name -- Valerie Elise Plame -- but not her occupation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607130005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 13:26:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Colmes challenged Coulter&#x27;s claim that &#x22;you never see conservatives ... using someone&#x27;s tragedy&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606130008</link>
<description>In two appearances on Fox News, Ann Coulter continued her attacks on the widows of 9-11 victims and added that &#x22;you never see conservatives ... using someone&#x27;s tragedy.&#x22; But as Alan Colmes noted, Debra Burlingame, whose brother died in the 9-11 attacks, and &#x22;a little girl who lost her mother during 9-11&#x22; were both &#x22;used to promote President Bush&#x22; during the 2004 presidential campaign. Coulter&#x27;s response: &#x22;[H]e&#x27;s the commander in chief.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606130008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:53:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Napolitano, Schatz touted McCain as one of &#x22;very few members&#x22; of Congress who oppose government pork</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604100001</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; Andrew P. Napolitano uncritically touted Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) as one of few members of Congress who are able to reject pork-barrel government projects. Napolitano made these remarks during a conversation with Tom Schatz, the president of Citizens against Government Waste, who also said that McCain is one of the &#x22;very few&#x22; lawmakers &#x22;who don&#x27;t take these kinds of projects.&#x22; In fact, McCain recently introduced a bill to spend $10 million in federal money to establish an Arizona law center in tribute to late Supreme Court Justice William H. Rehnquist, which critics have argued is a &#x22;classic&#x22; pork-barrel project that &#x22;funnel[s] money directly to a home-state institution for a project that should find financing elsewhere.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604100001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 11:00:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Gibson and Napolitano lavished praise on &#x22;our boy Scalia&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603290006</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; John Gibson and Andrew Napolitano lauded U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia while discussing whether Scalia should recuse himself from a case involving a Guant&#x26;aacute;namo Bay prisoner after Scalia stated that prisoners at Guant&#x26;aacute;namo  Bay have no legal rights.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603290006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:16:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Napolitano to O&#x27;Reilly: If Hillary Clinton were president, &#x22;pro-life and pro-gun&#x22; activists, conservative commentators would be &#x22;targets of warrantless searches&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601130008</link>
<description>In a conversation with &#x3C;em&#x3E;Radio Factor&#x3C;/em&#x3E; host Bill O&#x27;Reilly about President Bush&#x27;s secret authorization of warrantless domestic wiretapping, Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew P. Napolitano asked: &#x22;Would you feel this way if Hillary [Clinton] were president?&#x22; Napolitano then added: &#x22;Because then you know the pro-life and the pro-gun will -- they&#x27;ll be targets of warrantless searches. ... And maybe conservative commentators will be targets of warrantless searches.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601130008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:25:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>