<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Anita Vogel</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/anita_vogel</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Anita Vogel</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Vogel misrepresented Democrats&#x27; CA ballot measures as &#x22;protect[ing] the current process&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240004</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special
Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, correspondent Anita Vogel falsely claimed that ballot
initiatives proposed by Democrats on the
distribution of California&#x27;s
electoral votes would &#x22;protect the current process.&#x22; In fact, the initiatives would change the
&#x22;current process&#x22; if enacted by California and other states.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:30:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox News, &#x22;pro-reform&#x22; means favoring CA Republicans&#x27; electoral initiative, not Democrats&#x27;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230011</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
correspondent Anita
Vogel reported on a
ballot initiative proposed by a
Republican organization that would &#x22;divvy up&#x22; California&#x27;s &#x22;55 coveted
electoral votes to the winner of each congressional district, rather than the
winner-take-all system currently in place.&#x22; On-screen text during
Vogel&#x27;s report identified a spokesman for the GOP group as
&#x22;pro-reform&#x22; and an
opponent of the initiative as &#x22;anti-reform.&#x22; However, the spokesman has criticized two other initiatives on California&#x27;s
electoral vote that have been proposed by Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:40:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Vogel falsely suggested AARP opposed California&#x27;s new driver-assessment program</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611280002</link>
<description>In a report on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox
News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, correspondent Anita Vogel falsely suggested that the AARP
opposes California&#x27;s
new driver-assessment program. In fact, while the AARP does oppose legislation that would
require additional driving tests based solely on age, AARP supports legislation
requiring driver assessments for all, such as California&#x27;s program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611280002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:29:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In report on Cunningham&#x27;s sentencing, Fox&#x27;s Vogel failed to mention he is a Republican</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603070001</link>
<description>During a March 3 report on the sentencing of former Rep. Randy &#x22;Duke&#x22; Cunningham for corruption, Fox News correspondent Anita Vogel did not once mention that Cunningham is a Republican.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603070001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:18:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>