<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Anne Kornblut</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/anne_kornblut</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Anne Kornblut</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; quoted Mudcat Saunders on Clinton&#x27;s chances in VA without noting his stated opposition to her  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802070008</link>
<description>In an article on the upcoming Virginia primary, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; included a quote from former Edwards campaign strategist Mudcat Saunders, saying that Sen. Hillary Clinton &#x22;might encounter difficulty connecting with southwest Virginians, who have been hit hard by plant closings,&#x22; because &#x22;many people there blame the North American Free Trade Agreement, signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1993.&#x22; But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not note that Saunders has said a Hillary Clinton presidency would violate the Constitution and that he has vowed &#x22;to do everything I can to make sure&#x22; John Edwards does not endorse Clinton.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802070008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:20:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; baselessly asserted that Clinton was referring to  NH moment by saying &#x22;I said I would not tear up&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050009</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and  the&#x3C;em&#x3E; New York Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; both baselessly  asserted that Sen. Hillary Clinton referred to an emotional moment before last  month&#x27;s New Hampshire primary when she said  during a February 4 visit to the Yale Child  Study Center, &#x22;I said I would not tear up.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802050009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:05:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media outlets continued to mislead on the Clintons&#x27; &#x22;fairy tale&#x22; and civil rights quotes  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801130004</link>
<description>Articles in &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; mischaracterized a remark by former President Bill Clinton, claiming that he appeared to dismiss Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s campaign as &#x22;the biggest fairy tale I&#x27;ve ever seen.&#x22; In fact, Clinton was referring to Obama&#x27;s statements about his position on the Iraq war; he was not talking about the Obama campaign as the &#x22;biggest fairy tale.&#x22; Further, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article, as well as a&#x3C;em&#x3E; New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article and a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; op-ed, all truncated a comment by Hillary Clinton on the passage of civil rights legislation in the 1960s, omitting a portion of her remarks in which she referred to President John F. Kennedy.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801130004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:49:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Kornblut: &#x22;[C]ertainly Chris Matthews has taken [Clinton] on quite aggressively over the last  few weeks&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801100006</link>
<description>Responding to an online commenter who said that a lot of women are &#x22;getting  incredibly angry about the progressively dismissive way&#x22; Sen. Hillary Rodham  Clinton &#x22;gets treated by the [&#x3C;em&#x3E;New York  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Maureen] Dowds and [MSNBC host Chris] Matthews of the  world,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Anne E. Kornblut asserted, &#x22;I think there is something to that&#x22; and &#x22;certainly  Chris Matthews has taken her on quite aggressively over the last few weeks.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801100006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:11:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kornblut claimed Clinton change in rhetoric on health care plan, but offered no evidence</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711260005</link>
<description>In an entry on The Trail, titled &#x22;A Clinton
Shift in Selling Health Plan,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Anne Kornblut
wrote, &#x22;When Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) introduced her health
care proposal, she emphasized its centrist nature: a business-friendly model
that would allow consumers maximum choice,&#x22; adding, &#x22;But ... Clinton honed in this weekend with a
more traditionally liberal aspect of her plan: It would require all people to get
health insurance, with a goal of achieving universal health care.&#x22; In so doing, Kornblut suggested that Clinton&#x27;s emphasis on the
&#x22;universal&#x22; aspect of her health care plan is new, without offering any evidence to support that suggestion. In fact, when
Clinton
introduced her plan, she repeatedly referred to the fact that it is
&#x22;universal&#x22; and &#x22;covers all Americans.&#x22; And since
introducing it, she has repeatedly stressed its focus on universal coverage.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711260005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:54:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Kornblut claimed that at debate, Hillary Clinton &#x22;seemed to contradict&#x22; Bill  Clinton letter on presidential records -- but it was Russert who misrepresented  letter</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711090012</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Anne E. Kornblut claimed that during the 
October 30 Democratic presidential debate, Sen. Hillary Clinton &#x22;seemed to 
contradict a directive from her husband [former President Bill Clinton], who in 
2002 wrote a letter suggesting archivists consider correspondence between him 
and his wife for withholding.&#x22; Kornblut did not note that, in fact, it was 
moderator Tim Russert who misrepresented Bill Clinton&#x27;s 2002 letter by 
characterizing it as a &#x22;ban&#x22; on the release of the correspondence; the letter 
did not ask that such communications &#x22;not be made available&#x22; but, rather, 
as Kornblut reported, 
listed them as 
documents to be &#x22;considered for withholding.&#x22; Further, Clinton adviser Bruce 
Lindsey has stated that &#x22;Bill Clinton has not 
asked that records related to communications with Senator Clinton be 
withheld.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711090012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Nov 2007 15:22:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Kornblut misrepresented earlier mischaracterization of Clinton torture  comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120007</link>
<description>Responding to a reader&#x27;s question 
about an article she co-wrote, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The 
Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Anne E. Kornblut stated, &#x22;We asked Sen. [Hillary 
Rodham] Clinton 
what she would do, upon taking office, about special interrogation methods ... 
such as waterboarding or sexual humiliation. ... And her response was simply that 
she opposes torture, which of course is also the current policy.&#x22; But according 
to a transcript of the 
interview, Clinton was not 
specifically asked about &#x22;waterboarding or sexual humiliation,&#x22; and she did not 
refuse to say whether she would prohibit such measures. Indeed, she said that she 
would &#x22;draw a bright line and say &#x27;No torture,&#x27; &#x22; and that she would 
&#x22;abide by the Geneva conventions, [and] 
abide by the laws we 
have passed.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:31:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kornblut  still struggling with Clinton quotes?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710110001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Anne E. Kornblut and Dan 
Balz reported that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was &#x22;vague about how she would 
handle special interrogation methods used by the CIA.&#x22; Adding, &#x22;She said that 
while she does not condone torture, so much has been kept secret that she would 
not know unless elected what other extreme measures interrogators are using, and 
therefore could not say whether she would change or continue existing policies.&#x22; 
But blogger Greg Sargent later reported that Kornblut and Balz omitted from 
their article Clinton&#x27;s statement that &#x22;I think 
we have to draw a bright line and say &#x27;No torture -- abide by the Geneva conventions, abide 
by the laws we have passed,&#x27; and then try to make sure we implement that.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710110001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:14:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kornblut on  &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;Republican crowds are  a little different. They still want to be supporting the  troops&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:26:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Kornblut repeated notion of &#x22;Clinton fatigue,&#x22; provided no evidence</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704300009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:54:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Myths and falsehoods about Hillary Rodham Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:12:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who are Sen. Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;evil men&#x22;? Media mind-readers can&#x27;t agree</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:41:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Omitting relevant fact, Kornblut cast doubt on Clinton&#x27;s candor regarding announcement</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:42:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Kornblut focused on politics of Clinton health proposal, ignored substance</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701220008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701220008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:19:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Anne &#x22;Editor&#x27;s Note&#x22; Kornblut imagines Clinton may have been faking cell-phone call</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701170004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701170004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:44:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>