<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Armstrong Williams</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/armstrong_williams</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Armstrong Williams</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Armstrong Williams: &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; story on McCain &#x22;causes those of us in the media to lose credibility&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802220006</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Armstrong Williams said of the &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on Sen. John McCain&#x27;s relationship with a telecommunications lobbyist, &#x22;I think what it does more than anything else, it causes those of us in the media to lose credibility. People begin to question what we print, whether there&#x27;s any truth to it, whether we do our research.&#x22; But Williams himself has been embroiled in controversy that undermined his &#x22;credibility,&#x22; reportedly receiving $240,000 from the Bush administration to promote President Bush&#x27;s No Child Left Behind legislation.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802220006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:24:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Armstrong Williams: By &#x22;B-word,&#x22; Thomas just meant that sexual-harassment plaintiff is &#x22;a tough broad&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709190002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
during a discussion of a sexual-harassment lawsuit against Isiah Thomas, Armstrong Williams asserted, &#x22;I think sometimes guys use it [the word &#x22;bitch&#x22;], like,
let&#x27;s say, for Isiah Thomas, if the woman did spurn his advances and if she
found him offensive and did not give him the kind of attention that he&#x27;s accustomed to
getting from women, because he&#x27;s supposed to be the celebrated athlete and not
president of the New York Knicks, then he referred to her as a B, because he
did not get her way.
Still, he&#x27;s implying here she&#x27;s a tough broad.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709190002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:31:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Payola columnist Armstrong Williams repeated Social Security misinformation in self-syndicated column</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200502140007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200502140007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:49:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Colmes confronted Williams with inconsistent statements on No Child Left Behind</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501310003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501310003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:38:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x22;The Point&#x22; falsely equated Dean bloggers with Armstrong Williams</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501260012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501260012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:59:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://www.lautenberg.senate.gov/~lautenberg/press/2003/01/2005112845.html&#x22;&#x3E;Sens. Lautenberg &#x26;amp; Reid Ask President Bush to Remove Armstrong Wiliams from White House Commission&#x3C;/a&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501120013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501120013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:53:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In 2001, Armstrong Williams criticized aspect of plan he was later paid to promote</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501120001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501120001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 19:11:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;a href=&#x22;http://citizensforethics.org/activities/20050111/&#x22;&#x3E;CREW Files FOIAs to Uncover Other Armstrong Williamses&#x3C;/a&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501110004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501110004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2005 12:14:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will Sinclair sever ties with Armstrong Williams over scandal?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501110002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501110002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:42:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Armstrong Williams&#x27;s conflicting statements on disclosure</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501110001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501110001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:00:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Armstrong Williams&#x27;s website touts upcoming interview with President Bush</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501100009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501100009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:47:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boortz: Williams &#x22;under such heat&#x22; because No Child Left Behind, &#x22;black conservatives&#x22; aren&#x27;t &#x22;popular with liberals&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501100006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501100006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:42:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Armstrong Williams &#x22;just got up and walked&#x22; from Scarborough</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501100003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501100003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:14:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Armstrong Williams promoted Bush policies in writing, too</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501070012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501070012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:42:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Congressional Letters, RE: Armstrong Williams</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200501070010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200501070010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:13:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>