<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Attacks on Bill Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/attacks_on_bill_clinton</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Attacks on Bill Clinton</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Hannity distorted Clinton&#x27;s remarks about Mandela, falsely cited it as part of &#x22;a series of attacks&#x22; on McCain&#x27;s &#x22;military record&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807100002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Sean Hannity aired a deceptively cropped statement from Bill Clinton&#x27;s remarks at the Aspen Ideas Festival in asserting that Clinton was &#x22;obviously taking a shot at Senator [John] McCain,&#x22; omitting the context showing that Clinton was discussing what Nelson Mandela means to him. Hannity also falsely asserted that Clinton&#x27;s statement and recent comments by Wesley Clark were part of &#x22;a series of attacks on Senator McCain&#x27;s military record.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807100002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:58:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; baselessly claimed Bill Clinton took &#x22;a swipe at John McCain,&#x22; falsely suggested his and Clark&#x27;s comments part of Obama attack strategy  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080006</link>
<description>Three &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-hosts repeatedly asserted that former President Bill Clinton recently &#x22;attack[ed]&#x22; Sen. John McCain&#x27;s &#x22;selfless heroism at the Hanoi Hilton,&#x22; in Andrew Napolitano&#x27;s words, and two of the hosts -- Napolitano and Gretchen Carlson -- falsely suggested that Clinton&#x27;s statement and recent comments by retired Gen. Wesley Clark were part of a coordinated effort by Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s campaign to &#x22;attack&#x22; McCain&#x27;s service. But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-hosts provided no evidence that Clinton&#x27;s comments were intended to refer to McCain; nor did they provide the context of those remarks.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:54:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Brewer falsely claimed Bill Clinton &#x22;reportedly told&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Telegraph&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that &#x22;Obama was going to, quote, &#x27;have to kiss my you-know-what&#x27; &#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806300007</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Contessa Brewer falsely claimed that former President Bill Clinton &#x22;reportedly told London&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Telegraph&#x3C;/em&#x3E; paper that [Sen.] Barack Obama was going to, quote, &#x27;have to kiss my you-know-what,&#x27; unquote, if he wanted the former president&#x27;s help.&#x22; In fact, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Telegraph&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article quoted an anonymous &#x22;senior Democrat who worked for Mr Clinton,&#x22; who in turn cited another anonymous source: &#x22;One person told me that Bill said Obama would have to quote kiss my ass close quote, if he wants his support.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806300007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:47:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC shows great interest in purported Clinton &#x22;enemies list,&#x22; despite &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;article&#x27;s absence of on-the-record evidence  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806120009</link>
<description>Despite the absence in a June 11 &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article of on-the-record evidence of a Clinton &#x22;enemies list,&#x22; MSNBC interviewed&#x3C;em&#x3E; New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Mark Leibovich twice and devoted a total of nearly 25 minutes to the topic in at least 10 separate segments that day.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806120009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:50:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews mischaracterized Bill Clinton &#x22;fairy tale&#x22; quote  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803040001</link>
<description>Chris Matthews asserted that former President Bill Clinton &#x22;made a series of remarks about Barack Obama that turned off many Democrats and may have helped galvanize black voters for Obama.&#x22; Matthews then aired an abbreviated clip of Clinton&#x27;s January 7 comments, &#x22;This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I&#x27;ve ever seen,&#x22; leaving out his preceding comments in which Clinton made clear that he was talking about Obama&#x27;s statements regarding the Iraq war and not Obama&#x27;s campaign.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803040001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:37:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carlson  falsely claimed Giustra  allowed Clinton  personally to &#x22;get rich&#x22;   </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010002</link>
<description>Discussing a &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;New York  Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;article reporting on a trip by former President  Bill Clinton to Kazakhstan with Canadian mining  financier Frank Giustra, Tucker Carlson stated: &#x22;Bill Clinton, the former  president, out there, contravening official American foreign policy on behalf of  some anti-democratic dictator so his buddy can get rich and he can get rich as a  result? It&#x27;s like unbelievable.&#x22; In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not report that  Clinton received money from Giustra  for himself; rather,  Giustra donated money to Clinton&#x27;s foundation.   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:41:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: Clinton, &#x22;the most cheated-on woman in the world,&#x22; now &#x22;surrounded&#x22; by her &#x22;white female new &#x3C;em&#x3E;castrati&#x3C;/em&#x3E; male base&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801240014</link>
<description>On his radio show, Rush Limbaugh claimed that Sen. Hillary Clinton is &#x22;in the Northeast ... surrounded by her good old ... white female new &#x3C;em&#x3E;castrati&#x3C;/em&#x3E; male base, while her husband, Bill, pays penance -- left to deal in South Carolina, while she&#x27;s up with her people, the whites and the less-than-blacks.&#x22; Other media figures have also used various forms of &#x22;castrati&#x22; in reference to Clinton and her supporters, including Chris Matthews, who once questioned people who have endorsed Clinton, saying, &#x22;[A]ren&#x27;t you appalled at the willingness of these people to become &#x3C;em&#x3E;castratos&#x3C;/em&#x3E; in the eunuch chorus here or whatever they are?&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801240014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:31:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media  falsely characterized Bill Clinton, Obama as  having &#x22;lashed out,&#x22; &#x22;fire[d] back angrily&#x22; at  reporters  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801240005</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Wolf Blitzer asserted, as did a  &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; blog  entry, that Bill Clinton  &#x22;lashed out&#x22; at CNN congressional correspondent Jessica Yellin after she asked  him a question following a campaign event in South Carolina that day. Recounting the  exchange to Blitzer, Yellin agreed, &#x22;He lashed out, Wolf.&#x22; Similarly, an  ABCNews.com report described a &#x22;testy exchange&#x22; between Barack Obama and&#x3C;em&#x3E;  New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Jeff Zeleny. But videos of the two exchanges  do not support these sensational descriptions.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801240005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:37:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Noonan asserted  &#x22;Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton&#x22; is a &#x22;sickness&#x22; that &#x22;is giving so many people  pause&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801210003</link>
<description>Discussing &#x22;dynasticism&#x22; on NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the  Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street  Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Peggy Noonan asserted that &#x22;this  Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton&#x22; is a &#x22;sickness&#x22; that &#x22;is giving so many people  pause.&#x22; But when asked how they felt about members of the Bush and Clinton  families holding the presidency for nearly 20 years, 50 percent of respondents  in a recent &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/CBS  News poll said it &#x22;doesn&#x27;t really make much difference.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801210003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:30:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Alter, like  &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, omitted Rose&#x27;s on-air  explanation for abrupt ending of Clinton interview  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801210001</link>
<description>Referencing an interview former President Bill Clinton gave on PBS&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Charlie Rose Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jonathan Alter wrote, &#x22;During a  December taping with PBS&#x27;s Charlie Rose, a frustrated Clinton called [Sen.  Barack] Obama &#x27;a roll of the dice,&#x27; as aides tried to end the interview.&#x22;  However, Alter omitted Rose&#x27;s on-air comments in which he indicated why  Clinton&#x27;s aides  wanted to &#x22;end the interview.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801210001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:12:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Coulter:  &#x22;[I]f you attack the Clintons publicly, make sure all your friends  know that you are not planning suicide&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240010</link>
<description>Apparently referring to conservative allegations that the Clintons were somehow 
involved in the death of Vincent Foster, Ann Coulter asserted: &#x22;[I]f you attack 
the Clintons publicly, make sure all your friends know that you are not planning 
suicide, that you&#x27;re not careless when you drive a car.&#x22; However, numerous 
investigations have determined that Foster&#x27;s death was a suicide.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:19:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On  &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Melanie Morgan claimed  Bill Clinton &#x22;is still dating&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708010005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:51:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Colbert Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ridiculed Hannity&#x27;s baseless suggestion of &#x22;foul play&#x22; in Vince Foster&#x27;s death</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707260004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707260004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:26:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite past discussion on his show, Hannity claimed he had &#x22;never heard&#x22; Coulter call for Clinton assassination</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707100005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707100005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:59:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Web version of &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Gerth article left uncorrected 13 years after publication</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705300006</link>
<description>Thirteen years after the
publication of a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;
article that made a false claim regarding President Bill Clinton&#x27;s tenure
as Arkansas
governor, the online and Nexis versions of that article still do not include
the correction.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705300006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:00:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>