<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Ben Smith</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/ben_smith</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Ben Smith</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Media repeat Limbaugh&#x27;s baseless charge that claimed Obama got &#x22;sweetheart deals&#x22; from Rezko without noting rebuttal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808220019</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Ben Smith and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mark Halperin uncritically reported Rush Limbaugh&#x27;s baseless assertion that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;got all kinds of sweetheart deals with [convicted Chicago businessman Antoin] Rezko&#x22; and that &#x22;[Sen. John McCain] and his wife did not get a sweetheart deal from a fraud embezzler like Tony Rezko to buy their houses.&#x22; Smith and Halperin did not note that the sellers of the house Obama bought reportedly said they did not cut their asking price because Rezko bought the adjacent lot, even though they had each previously reported it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808220019</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:42:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Smith, Martin reported McCain campaign&#x27;s claim that Obama would raise taxes on 21 million small businesses without noting it&#x27;s false     </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807070001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; writers Ben Smith and Jonathan Martin reported a claim by Tucker Bounds, McCain campaign spokesman, that &#x22;Barack Obama wants more taxes from 21 million small businesses,&#x22; without noting that it is false. In fact, Obama has proposed rolling back President Bush&#x27;s tax cuts only on &#x22;people who are making 250,000 dollars a year or more,&#x22; and according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy  Center, 481,000 small businesses fall into the tax brackets that would be affected by those increases.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807070001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 11:56:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ben Smith ignored &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s own reporting in claiming &#x22;the only outside attack ads to run this cycle have been financed by Obama allies&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806200010</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Ben Smith reported that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;has complained that [Sen. John] McCain said he couldn&#x27;t control attack ads from outside groups -- though the only outside attack ads to run this cycle have been financed by Obama allies and directed at McCain.&#x22; In fact, the Vets for Freedom political action committee launched two Internet ads in May attacking Obama over issues related to the Iraq war, and the independent group Freedom&#x27;s Watch ran television ads attacking Obama and two Democratic congressional candidates.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806200010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:35:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x27;s &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Smith falsely suggested Clinton criticized Obama&#x27;s specific Social Security proposal  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806130005</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Ben Smith falsely suggested that Sen. Hillary Clinton criticized Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s proposal to address the solvency of Social Security, which includes raising the payroll tax on workers earning more than $250,000 per year. In fact, while Clinton said in November 2007 that she opposes &#x22;lift[ing] the cap completely,&#x22; she has not said that she opposes raising the cap on payroll taxes if the plan to do so includes a so-called &#x22;doughnut hole&#x22; exempting those earning less than $250,000 from a tax increase, as Obama has proposed.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806130005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:25:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN online poll echoes smears by asking if Obama &#x22;show[s] the proper patriotism&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250002</link>
<description>A CNN online poll asked: &#x22;Does [Sen.] Barack Obama show the proper patriotism for someone who wants to be president of the United States?&#x22; The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Ben Smith wrote: &#x22;[I]t&#x27;s odd to see the mainstream media drive a largely whispered question that none of his main, named critics -- Hillary, McCain or the RNC -- will touch.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802250002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:36:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On MSNBC, Corke  and Cillizza falsely claimed NV paper quoted Obama admitting he lacks  &#x22;experience&#x22; to &#x22;run a bureaucracy&#x22; and &#x22;be a  CEO&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801150017</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, anchor Kevin Corke  falsely asserted that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;said  he doesn&#x27;t have the, quote, &#x27;experience to run a bureaucracy.&#x27; &#x22; Corke was  apparently referring to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Reno  Gazette-Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article that reported, &#x22;Obama freely admits he  doesn&#x27;t have the experience to run a bureaucracy&#x22;; however, the newspaper did  not quote Obama saying he lacks the &#x22;experience to run a bureaucracy.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801150017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:02:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Smith claimed Clinton &#x22;chok[ed] up ... in response to a question about her hair&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801110012</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Ben Smith claimed that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton &#x22;chok[ed] up in a Portsmouth coffee shop, in response to a question about her hair.&#x22; But Smith did not report that the question was about more than just Clinton&#x27;s hair; as video of a portion of the exchange makes clear, the questioner also asked Clinton: &#x22;And my question is very personal, how do you do it? How do you, how do you keep upbeat and so wonderful?&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801110012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:15:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; misreported Clinton&#x27;s comments  during emotional moment in  NH</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801080003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Ben Smith misreported Sen.  Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s emotional remarks during a campaign event in Portsmouth, New  Hampshire. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that Clinton said, in part, &#x22;I  have so many &#x3C;em&#x3E;ideas for&#x3C;/em&#x3E; this  country, I just don&#x27;t want to see us fall backwards,&#x22; while Smith reported that  Clinton said: &#x22;I have so many  opportunities &#x3C;em&#x3E;for&#x3C;/em&#x3E; this country. I  don&#x27;t want to see us all fall back&#x22; [emphases added]. In fact, Clinton said, &#x22;You know, I have so  many &#x3C;em&#x3E;opportunities from&#x3C;/em&#x3E; this  country&#x22; [emphasis  added].</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801080003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:56:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From  cleavage to &#x22;cackle&#x22;? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; gotcha on Chelsea Clinton&#x27;s schooling exposes poor reporting instead</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:24:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s&#x3C;em&#x3E; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Smith charged Clinton &#x22;seems to be breaching&#x22; a &#x22;less-aggression&#x22; pact with News Corp.</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707220002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707220002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 16:45:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In criticizing &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Thrush, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Smith conflated investigative reporting with Blitzer&#x27;s baseless question</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705210004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705210004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:32:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Smith: Fox News&#x27; coverage of Hillary Clinton &#x22;has been largely respectful&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:51:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UPDATE: &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Smith claimed &#x22;cowards&#x22; line &#x22;was tongue in cheek&#x22; -- but few readers seemed to get joke</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:51:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>