<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Boston Globe</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/boston_globe</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Boston Globe</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported McCain&#x27;s attack on Obama on campaign finance, but not that McCain may be breaking campaign finance laws  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805220006</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported in an article that Sen. John McCain has &#x22;accus[ed] [Sen. Barack] Obama of going back on his word to take part in the public system&#x22; without noting that the Obama campaign has also criticized McCain on public financing or that the FEC chairman has taken the position that McCain cannot legally opt out of public financing during the primary season without FEC approval.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805220006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:02:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring reversals,&#x3C;em&#x3E; Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; cited taxes and immigration as evidence that McCain &#x22;appears to delight in defying his fellow Republicans&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804270001</link>
<description>In asserting that Sen. John McCain &#x22;appears to delight in defying his fellow Republicans on matters ranging from taxes to the environment,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Susan Milligan cited &#x22;McCain&#x27;s support for immigration reform&#x22; and his &#x22;opposition to the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2002.&#x22; But Milligan made no mention of the fact that McCain has reversed his position on taxes and immigration to more closely align himself with the base of his party.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804270001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:42:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>  &#x3C;em&#x3E;Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Canellos claimed McCain has a &#x22;nonideological voting record&#x22; -- but not according to McCain  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803250006</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Peter S. Canellos reported that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s &#x22;opposition to Bush on a range of issues, combined with his nonideological voting record, gives him an image of moderation.&#x22; In fact, McCain himself has stated, &#x22;My record in public office taken as a whole is the record of a mainstream conservative,&#x22; and has said that he will &#x22;offer Americans ... a clearly conservative approach to governing.&#x22; Furthermore, academic studies of McCain&#x27;s voting record have ranked him among the most conservative members of the Senate.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803250006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:04:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article,  &#x3C;em&#x3E;Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column discussing NOW-NY  letter omitted Clinton campaign&#x27;s reported disavowal of  letter  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801310005</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article  and a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column both discussed a  statement from the New York chapter of the National Organization for Women that  criticized Sen. Edward M. Kennedy for endorsing Sen. Barack Obama and not Sen. Hillary Rodham  Clinton for president,  but both omitted the Clinton campaign&#x27;s reported disavowal of  NOW New York&#x27;s statement. In a New York &#x3C;em&#x3E;Daily News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Bill Hammond reported that &#x22;her [Clinton&#x27;s] campaign quickly disavowed [NOW New York president  Marcia] Pappas&#x27; attack on Kennedy. &#x27;This statement does not at all reflect her  views or the opinion of the Clinton campaign,&#x27; spokesman Howard Wolfson  said.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801310005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:03:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; joined &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; in falsely suggesting that Hagel and Clinton took different positions on Iraq war resolution  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170004</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article suggested that Sens. Chuck Hagel and Hillary Rodham Clinton took different positions on the 2002 resolution that authorized the use of force against Iraq. But the article did not mention that Hagel, like Clinton, voted in favor of the resolution, nor that he praised the &#x22;substantially similar&#x22; Senate version and its sponsors.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801170004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:34:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Cackle joins The Haircut and The Sigh</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710100002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710100002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:29:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From  cleavage to &#x22;cackle&#x22;? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What haircut stories tell us about the press</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 May 2007 12:25:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; headline &#x22;Obama&#x27;s silence on Imus alarms some blacks&#x22; unsupported by article</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704120003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704120003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:28:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Hill, Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, others quote Romney attack on Pelosi trip without correction</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:21:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The press manufactures John Kerry&#x27;s tears</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701300006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701300006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:11:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Editorial pages offer variety of takes on Foley scandal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610100013</link>
<description>Newspaper editorial boards have responded with a variety of opinions to the Mark Foley scandal, from calling for -- or opposing -- House Speaker Dennis Hastert&#x27;s resignation to noting the &#x22;rank hypocrisy&#x22; of Republican leaders to referring to the Republicans&#x27; attempt to use a &#x22;gay scapegoat.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610100013</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:51:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Press downplays Iraq during campaign season. Again.</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609260008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609260008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:57:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buyer&#x27;s remorse: The Bush story the press won&#x27;t tell</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609190002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609190002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:43:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Katie and Rush and the face of corporate news</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 11:25:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>