<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Candy Crowley</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/candy_crowley</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Candy Crowley</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Numerous media outlets reported McCain&#x27;s attack on Obama over public financing without noting McCain&#x27;s loan  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806200011</link>
<description>Numerous media outlets have reported all or part of Sen. John McCain&#x27;s statement rebuking Sen. Barack Obama for his decision to forgo public financing in the general election without mentioning that during the primary, McCain signed a loan that could have forced him to remain in the race -- even if he had no chance of winning -- in order to be eligible for public matching funds to repay the loan.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806200011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:46:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Predicting McCain will attack Obama over public financing, CNN&#x27;s Crowley did not report that McCain may be breaking the law  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806190002</link>
<description>On CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;American Morning&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, reporting on Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s decision to opt out of public financing for the general election, Candy Crowley asserted that &#x22;you can expect that [Sen. John McCain] will hit Obama on two scores: One, you went back on what you said you would do; and two, this is not how to reform Washington.&#x22; But Crowley did not report that McCain may actually be breaking campaign finance law.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806190002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:59:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Crowley, Fox News&#x27; Rosen cite McCain attacks on Obama&#x27;s Iraq knowledge without noting McCain&#x27;s misstatements about conditions in Iraq  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805290002</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Candy Crowley uncritically reported that Sen. John McCain is &#x22;continually suggesting Obama wants to surrender in Iraq without knowing what&#x27;s happening there,&#x22; and Fox News&#x27; James Rosen said, &#x22;Obama&#x27;s absence from the war zone over the last two and a half years, McCain argued, has left the first-term senator divorced from the reality that now prevails on the ground in Iraq.&#x22; However, neither Crowley nor Rosen mentioned any of the misstatements McCain has made that have raised questions about whether McCain himself &#x22;know[s] what&#x27;s happening&#x22; in Iraq.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805290002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:36:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>  CNN has yet to note that, notwithstanding McCain&#x27;s criticism of Obama, McCain reportedly doesn&#x27;t expect Al Qaeda in Iraq would &#x22;be taking a country&#x22; if &#x22;we left&#x22; Iraq  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804230003</link>
<description>After airing several reports in February highlighting Sen. John McCain&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;if we left [Iraq], [Al Qaeda in Iraq] wouldn&#x27;t be establishing a base ... they&#x27;d be taking a country,&#x22; CNN has yet to follow up by noting that McCain reportedly does not believe that assertion. According to &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x22;[f]ew, including Mr. McCain, expect Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia [Iraq], a Sunni group, to take control of Shiite-dominated Iraq in the event of an American withdrawal.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804230003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:00:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Blitzer asserted Petraeus and Crocker are not &#x22;political appointees&#x22; -- but Bush appointed both to current positions  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804090012</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Situation Room&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Wolf Blitzer said: &#x22;General [David] Petraeus is a career military officer. Ambassador [Ryan] Crocker is a career diplomat, a foreign service officer. It&#x27;s not as if they&#x27;re political appointees by the Bush administration in which they can sort of, you know, roll up their sleeves and really go after them.&#x22; In fact, both Petraeus and Crocker were nominated for their current positions by President Bush.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804090012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Apr 2008 20:57:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Crowley repeated accusation that Obama &#x22;distort[ed]&#x22; McCain&#x27;s &#x22;100 years&#x22; remark, without reporting what McCain actually said  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804020008</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Situation Room&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Candy Crowley stated that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;accus[ed] [Sen. John] McCain of wanting to be in Iraq for another 100 years.&#x22; She then reported &#x22;that is a distortion of what McCain said, and they push back very hard -- the McCain campaign -- when they hear this.&#x22; In fact, during a January 3 town hall meeting in New Hampshire, McCain said a U.S. military presence in Iraq for the next 100 years would &#x22;be fine ... [a]s long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804020008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:49:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Crowley again defines liberals by purported choice of caffeinated beverage  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110010</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Candy Crowley said that the &#x22;affluent, well-educated white voters&#x22; who were part of Sen. Barack &#x22;Obama&#x27;s voting bloc&#x22; were the &#x22;so-called latte liberals.&#x22; This statement recalls her reported 2004 suggestion that green tea is unfamiliar to &#x22;most of America&#x22; after John Kerry requested it in Iowa. Similarly, on Fox News, &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Michael Barone suggested that Obama would do well among &#x22;latte liberals.&#x22; Alan Colmes then challenged Barone&#x27;s description: &#x22;[A]re there latte conservatives?&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:48:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Blitzer,  Crowley claimed Obama &#x22;in sync&#x22; with Bush on  Pakistan</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2007 19:18:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Crowley on Dems&#x27; &#x22;old message&#x22;: &#x22;[W]e don&#x27;t support the troops and we&#x27;re not tough on national security&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702270013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702270013</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:37:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP, CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The State&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported McCain&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe &#x3C;/em&#x3E;comment without noting McCain&#x27;s history of flip-flopping on overturning &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702200008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702200008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 18:02:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Crowley uncritically aired Corker&#x27;s false statement that he &#x22;never said a negative word about [Ford&#x27;s] family&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250010</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Candy Crowley
uncritically aired Tennessee Republican Senate candidate Bob Corker&#x27;s
false claim that he has &#x22;never said a negative word&#x22; about the family
of his Democratic opponent, Rep. Harold Ford Jr. In fact, Corker has
&#x22;question[ed]&#x22; Ford&#x27;s father&#x27;s employment as a lobbyist, and
Corker&#x27;s campaign has repeatedly attacked Ford&#x27;s family as the
&#x22;Ford Political Machine.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:54:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Crowley asked Shuler if he is &#x22;a Nancy Pelosi Democrat,&#x22; but CNN has yet to ask Republicans if they are &#x22;Denny Hastert [or George Bush or Dick Cheney] Republicans&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:32:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Crowley dredges up anti-Democrat clich&#x26;eacute;s, asserts: &#x22;If Democrats do sweep into power this year ... it will be through no fault their own&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610200018</link>
<description>During a segment that looked at the Democrats&#x27; prospects in the upcoming midterm elections, CNN&#x27;s Candy Crowley devoted her report to reinforcing negative stereotypes about the Democratic Party promoted by Republicans and repeated in the media.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610200018</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:54:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>GOP strategists christen &#x22;Democrat [sic] Party&#x22; -- and the media comply</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608160005</link>
<description>Several media figures, including news reporters, echoed Republicans by employing the word &#x22;Democrat&#x22; as an adjective to refer to things or people of, or relating to, the Democratic Party.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608160005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:41:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Cooper and Crowley: Lamont victory shows that centrists cannot win Democratic primaries</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090003</link>
<description>Discussing incumbent Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman&#x27;s defeat in the Connecticut Democratic Senate primary, CNN host Anderson Cooper and senior political correspondent Candy Crowley both suggested that the election result shows that &#x22;moderates&#x22; or &#x22;centrists&#x22; cannot win a Democratic primary race. Their assertions are based on a false premise: that on the issue on which challenger Ned Lamont primarily ran -- the Iraq war -- Lamont&#x27;s view that the United States should withdraw is one held only by liberals, and that Lieberman&#x27;s opposition to withdrawal is the &#x22;centrist&#x22; position.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2006 11:28:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>