<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Charlie Gibson</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/charlie_gibson</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Charlie Gibson</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Gibson&#x27;s capital-gains tax assertion during debate disputed by economists  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180012</link>
<description>During the April 16 Democratic presidential debate, Charles Gibson asserted of capital-gains tax cuts that &#x22;in each instance, when the rate dropped, revenues from the tax increased. The government took in more money. And in the 1980s, when the tax was increased to 28 percent, the revenues went down.&#x22; In fact, economists dispute Gibson&#x27;s assertion. Moreover, looking forward, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the 2006 extension of the 2003 cuts on capital-gains taxes would result in decreased revenues over 10 years.     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:41:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>If flag lapel pin issue &#x22;comes up again and again&#x22; with voters, why did ABC rely on the &#x3C;em&#x3E;one&#x3C;/em&#x3E; voter quoted in &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;criticizing Obama?  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180005</link>
<description>During ABC&#x27;s April 16 Democratic presidential debate, Charles Gibson claimed that the issue of whether Sen. Barack Obama wears a flag lapel pin &#x22;comes up again and again when we talk to voters&#x22; and &#x22;is all over the Internet.&#x22; But McClatchy Newspapers reported that the woman who asked Obama about the flag lapel pin during the debate was &#x22;tracked ... down&#x22; by ABC &#x22;after she was quoted in a New York Times story about white voters in small-town Latrobe, Pa., revealing her as 52, out of work and against Obama.&#x22; If, as Gibson claimed, the flag pin issue &#x22;comes up again and again when we talk to voters,&#x22; why did ABC turn to the &#x3C;em&#x3E;one&#x3C;/em&#x3E; voter from Pennsylvania quoted in &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; criticizing Obama over the issue?     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:50:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media criticize ABC moderators for &#x22;flat-out repulsive&#x22; debate performances, &#x22;specious and gossipy&#x22; subject matter  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804170007</link>
<description>Numerous media figures have criticized George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson, moderators of the Democratic presidential debate on ABC, or the subject matter of the event, in part or in whole, as &#x22;shoddy [and] despicable,&#x22; &#x22;specious and gossipy,&#x22; &#x22;cringe-worthy,&#x22; &#x22;banal,&#x22; consisting of &#x22;tabloid trivia,&#x22; &#x22;flat-out repulsive,&#x22; &#x22;embarrassing,&#x22; &#x22;seem[ingly] slanted against [Sen. Barack] Obama,&#x22; &#x22;shameful,&#x22; and &#x22;an outrage.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804170007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:33:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Gibson aired McCain&#x27;s criticism of Obama, but did not mention Obama&#x27;s response  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804160003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;World News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Charles Gibson aired a clip of Sen. John McCain&#x27;s remarks at the April 14 Associated Press Annual Meeting and Luncheon -- during which McCain criticized Sen. Barack Obama for comments Obama made on April 6 -- but did not note that Obama responded to McCain&#x27;s comments later that day at the same event.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804160003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:17:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In reporting &#x22;surprising good news on sales of existing homes,&#x22; ABC ignored 24 percent decline in sales from Feb. 2007  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803250004</link>
<description>Introducing a report on &#x22;surprising good news on sales of existing homes,&#x22; ABC&#x3C;a href=&#x22;#note&#x22;&#x3E;*&#x3C;/a&#x3E; News&#x27; Charles Gibson stated that &#x22;[a]fter falling for six straight months, sales rose almost 3 percent in February.&#x22; But neither Gibson, nor correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi in the subsequent report, noted that home sales were still down nearly 24 percent from February 2007.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803250004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:30:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>During NH debate, ABC&#x27;s Gibson characterized Obama&#x27;s Pakistan position as &#x22;essentially the Bush doctrine,&#x22; ignoring Bush contradictions</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801080001</link>
<description>During the ABC News-Facebook Democratic debate, ABC News&#x27; Charlie Gibson said  that Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s assertion that, as president, he would &#x22;press them [the  Pakistani government] to do more to take on Al Qaeda in their territory,&#x22; and  that &#x22;if they could not or would not do so, and we had actionable intelligence,  then I would strike,&#x22; is &#x22;essentially the Bush doctrine: We can attack if we  want to, no matter the sovereignty of the Pakistanis.&#x22; But by asserting that  Obama&#x27;s policy on Pakistan is &#x22;essentially the Bush doctrine,&#x22; Gibson was  claiming that there is in fact a clear Bush doctrine on the question of whether  the U.S. would strike Al Qaeda in Pakistan regardless of the sovereignty of  Pakistan. Bush and administration officials have in fact made inconsistent  statements on this issue.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801080001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:38:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite hyping lower July death toll, network evening news programs silent on number of troop deaths this summer</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290001</link>
<description>ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;World News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;CBS&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Evening News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
and NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightly News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;
reported that the death toll for U.S.
service members in Iraq
was down in July. But none of the programs noted at the time that U.S.
troop death numbers for July, while lower than previous months, meant that this
July was the deadliest July of the war. And none of the programs have reported the fact that the current number of troops killed in Iraq for the months of June, July,
and August makes the summer of 2007 the bloodiest summer of the war for
American soldiers.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:20:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s  Gibson ignored  Padilla&#x27;s three-year detention without charges</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170011</link>
<description>In reporting that Jose Padilla &#x22;was convicted ... of supporting terrorism,&#x22; 
ABC&#x27;s Charles Gibson stated that Padilla &#x22;was originally accused of plotting 
with Al Qaeda to detonate a radioactive dirty bomb, but that charge was 
dropped.&#x22; In fact, Padilla was never &#x22;charge[d]&#x22; in relation to the alleged 
&#x22;dirty bomb&#x22; plot. Indeed, Padilla, a 
U.S. citizen, was held without 
charges for more than three years, a fact that Gibson did not mention.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:53:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC &#x3C;em&#x3E;World News &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reported Bush greenhouse gas reduction proposal, ignored criticism of it</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706010010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706010010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2007 19:34:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Gibson uncritically reported claim that &#x22;we dodged a bullet&#x22; by foiling terror plot on Fort Dix</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705090004</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;World
News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, while introducing a report on the foiled Fort Dix plot,
Charles Gibson uncritically repeated an FBI official&#x27;s claim that
&#x22;[t]oday, we dodged a bullet. In fact, when you look at the type of
weapons this group was trying to purchase, we may have dodged a lot of
bullets.&#x22; But neither Gibson nor ABC News&#x27; Brian Ross, in his
subsequent report, noted that no attack was alleged to be imminent and that Fort Dix
officials have reportedly claimed that the base was not, at any point, in
immediate danger.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705090004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 May 2007 15:21:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC, Fox News reported on Rice meeting with Syrian foreign minister without noting relentless criticism of Pelosi trip</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705070007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705070007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2007 17:41:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC offered no evidence in suggesting Democrats engaging in corrupt practices they denounced</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704270010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704270010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:54:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media outlets reported that Reid said Iraq war &#x22;is lost,&#x22; but failed to note his further comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704200012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704200012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:37:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; falsely reported Bush invited Dems to &#x22;negotiate&#x22; war spending bill</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704110008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:15:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC uncritically reported Bush&#x27;s claim that Congress would be responsible for &#x22;denying troops the equipment they need&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704040014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704040014</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Apr 2007 19:03:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>