<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Chris Cillizza</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/chris_cillizza</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Chris Cillizza</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Washingtonpost.com&#x27;s Cillizza repeatedly and falsely referred to Lieberman as a Democrat  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;America&#x27;s Election HQ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Chris Cillizza repeatedly and falsely referred to Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman as a Democrat. Even though an on-screen graphic identified Lieberman as an independent, Cillizza stated of the possibility that Sen. John McCain would pick a Democrat as a running mate: &#x22;[T]he Democrat that I think makes the most sense -- though I would say I think it&#x27;s very unlikely John McCain picks a Democrat -- but the Democrat that makes the most sense is Joe Lieberman.&#x22;    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:22:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On MSNBC, Corke  and Cillizza falsely claimed NV paper quoted Obama admitting he lacks  &#x22;experience&#x22; to &#x22;run a bureaucracy&#x22; and &#x22;be a  CEO&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801150017</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, anchor Kevin Corke  falsely asserted that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;said  he doesn&#x27;t have the, quote, &#x27;experience to run a bureaucracy.&#x27; &#x22; Corke was  apparently referring to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Reno  Gazette-Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article that reported, &#x22;Obama freely admits he  doesn&#x27;t have the experience to run a bureaucracy&#x22;; however, the newspaper did  not quote Obama saying he lacks the &#x22;experience to run a bureaucracy.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801150017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:02:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MoveOn.org  and the media mess</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709180005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709180005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:31:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Cillizza falsely claimed &#x22;most&#x22;  Dem candidates said &#x22;our kids don&#x27;t go to&#x22; public  schools</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708100007</link>
<description>Washingtonpost.com&#x27;s 
Chris Cillizza asserted 
that during a debate for Democratic presidential candidates, 
&#x22;Democrats were 
asked, &#x27;Are your kids in public 
schools?&#x27; Well, most of them said, &#x27;Yes, we believe very strongly in public 
schools. But no, our kids don&#x27;t go to them.&#x27; &#x22; In fact, three of the 
candidates said their children currently attend or did attend public schools, 
two said their children attended both public and private schools, and two said 
their children currently attend or did attend private schools.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708100007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:32:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On  &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball, &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Cillizza asserted  Democrats &#x22;need to prove&#x22; they can keep Americans &#x22;as safe as Republicans can&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708030005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708030005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:27:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times, Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; uncritically repeated Giuliani&#x27;s claim that anti-Giuliani firefighter unions are partisan</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707130001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707130001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:05:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Cillizza described Bush&#x27;s 70-percent approval among South Carolina GOP voters as &#x22;sky-high&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100018</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100018</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:33:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In questioning Obama&#x27;s &#x22;policy credentials,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Cillizza cited AP article without noting its false claim</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703300004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703300004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:58:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Cillizza falsely claimed Obama &#x22;is battling allegations of ethical misjudgment&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703070015</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703070015</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:48:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>