<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Chuck Hagel</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/chuck_hagel</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Chuck Hagel</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Duffy touted Hagel as a candidate &#x22;clearly against the war going back or going forward&#x22; -- but he voted for it</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703120005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703120005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:53:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck calls Hagel &#x22;100 percent clear and consistent&#x22; in opposing war he voted for</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:09:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Ignatius cast Hagel as among earliest &#x22;national politician[s]&#x22; to criticize Iraq war, ignoring his support for 2002 war resolution</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611290012</link>
<description>In his &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington
Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, David Ignatius asserted that if Sen. Chuck Hagel
decides to run for president in 2008, &#x22;he can claim to have been right
about Iraq and other key issues earlier than almost any national politician,
Republican or Democratic.&#x22; However, Ignatius&#x27; claim is undermined
by the fact that Hagel voted to authorize military action against Iraq in October
2002, which numerous Democrats vocally opposed at the time.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611290012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:50:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN and other outlets ignored Hagel&#x27;s denunciation of GOP &#x22;focus group-tested buzz words like &#x27;cut and run&#x27; &#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606220010</link>
<description>While CNN continued to hype the divisions among Democrats on the issue of U.S. redeployment from Iraq, stemming from the debate over two Senate proposals on the issue, the network entirely ignored a recent display of dissention within the Republican Party, as did Fox News and MSNBC.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606220010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:25:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; downplayed Republican, conservative objections to Bush domestic surveillance program</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601040002</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article asserted that the reaction to the Bush administration&#x27;s warrantless domestic spying program was &#x22;predictably partisan,&#x22; even though numerous Republican elected officials, conservative commentators, and newspapers that endorsed President Bush&#x27;s re-election in 2004 also criticized the program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601040002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:26:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; omitted Democratic response to Bush, Cheney attacks on Iraq War critics</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200511170008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200511170008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:32:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>After reporting Bush&#x27;s attack on war critics, media ignored Hagel&#x27;s response</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200511170001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200511170001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:01:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sen. Hagel response to MM letter</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200507010003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200507010003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:16:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Letter from David Brock to Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200506300005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200506300005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:53:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Schneider cropped Hagel quote to dilute criticism of Bush administration</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200506280012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200506280012</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:39:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>