<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Civil and Human Rights</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/civil_and_human_rights</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Civil and Human Rights</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Kristol, who previously said &#x22;[w]hite women are a problem ... we all live with,&#x22; is &#x22;appalled&#x22; by the &#x22;sexism and misogyny the Democratic primary voters demonstrated&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806290001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Bill Kristol, who previously declared that &#x22;[w]hite women are a problem ... we all live with that,&#x22; stated of Sen. Hillary Clinton: &#x22;She&#x27;s put behind her the horrible sexism and misogyny the Democratic primary voters demonstrated, which I&#x27;m appalled by, personally. Never would have happened in the Republican Party. You know, we&#x27;re -- Republicans are much more open to strong women.&#x22;    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806290001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:22:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>WABC* says Imus&#x27; explanation of controversial comments &#x22;makes sense&#x22; -- then why did Warner Wolf give a different one?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806250002</link>
<description>On his radio show, host Don Imus explained controversial comments he&#x27;d made the previous day about Adam &#x22;Pacman&#x22; Jones, who, it was noted, is African American, by asserting, &#x22;My point was that there&#x27;s no reason to arrest this kid six times. He&#x27;s a football player. He&#x27;s a lovely kid. He&#x27;s out having fun. He doesn&#x27;t need to be arrested six -- he gets arrested times. Well, we know why he gets arrested six times.&#x22; But, sportscaster Warner Wolf, who was part of both conversations, offered a different explanation: &#x22;[A]nybody that listens to the show knows that whether it&#x27;s a politician or an athlete or anyone, someone who&#x27;s obviously guilty, you joke and say, &#x27;Well, it must have been racism.&#x27; I mean, it&#x27;s a joke. I mean, we all know that &#x27;Pacman&#x27; is no model citizen. The guy&#x27;s been arrested and suspended. So it&#x27;s a joke.&#x22; Notwithstanding the apparent conflict in their explanations, WABC&#x27;s* Phil Boyce reportedly said of Imus&#x27; explanation: &#x22;When I first heard the comment I thought that&#x27;s probably what he meant, but I called him and he explained and it made sense to me. I said, &#x27;Let&#x27;s make sure you explain it the next time you&#x27;re on the air,&#x27; and he did a very good job.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806250002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:59:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring McCain&#x27;s inaction, AP claimed NC GOP &#x22;ignored McCain&#x27;s repeated calls to kill&#x22; controversial ad  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806230007</link>
<description>The AP reported that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s campaign &#x22;promises to condemn any race-based political appeals&#x22; and, referring to a controversial television ad by the North Carolina state Republican Party attacking Sen. Barack Obama, asserted that McCain made &#x22;repeated calls to kill the ad.&#x22; But according to the party&#x27;s chairwoman, at no point did McCain call her directly and ask that she not run the ad, and McCain reportedly said that &#x22;he wouldn&#x27;t have run the GOP ad, &#x27;but I am not going to referee, I am just going to run my own campaign.&#x27; &#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806230007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:50:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>KSFO&#x27;s Sussman invited guest to talk about his claim that &#x22;gay and lesbian radicals actively recruit through our schools and the media&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806180009</link>
<description>Discussing gay marriage, San Francisco radio host Brian Sussman said to guest Charlie Self: &#x22;On your website -- it&#x27;s interesting you&#x27;re addressing this very topic, Dr. Self, and you talk about how gay and lesbian radicals actively recruit through our schools and the media in order to swell their ranks. Talk to us about that for a moment.&#x22; Self asserted that there has been &#x22;a rash of [TV] programs in the last 10 years&#x22; that are &#x22;normalizing this particular chosen lifestyle.&#x22; Self added, &#x22;The only way that you are going to grow the ranks of this kind of movement is this kind of onslaught because it is simply not part of the nature of things as designed or as evolved or as historically recorded for thousands of years.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806180009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:14:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Savage: &#x22;The children&#x27;s minds are being raped by the homosexual mafia&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806180005</link>
<description>Responding to a caller who said, &#x22;I had to explain to my young son why these two men were holding hands the other day,&#x22; Michael Savage stated, &#x22;You&#x27;ve got to explain to the children ... why God told people this was wrong.&#x22; He went on to say, &#x22;You have to explain this to them in this time of mental rape that&#x27;s going on. The children&#x27;s minds are being raped by the homosexual mafia, that&#x27;s my position. They&#x27;re raping our children&#x27;s minds.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806180005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:48:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Buchanan called Obama &#x22;exotic,&#x22; said &#x22;[h]e&#x27;s like the guys in the Harvard faculty lounge&#x22; who &#x22;don&#x27;t know anything about their country&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160007</link>
<description> MSNBC political analyst Pat Buchanan said of the Republican strategy against Sen. Barack Obama: &#x22;[T]hey&#x27;re going to use his associations. And they&#x27;re going to use his statements, his elitism. They&#x27;re going to use the fact he&#x27;s exotic.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806160007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:35:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Hannity&#x27;s radio program, DeLay falsely claimed Obama supports &#x22;a bill to fingerprint every American in this country&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806120007</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Sean Hannity Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Tom DeLay falsely claimed that Sen. Barack Obama is &#x22;in favor of a bill to fingerprint every American in this country and have a national fingerprint database.&#x22; In fact, the bill to which DeLay was apparently referring would require employees of banks that apply for &#x22;licensing and registration as a State-licensed loan originator,&#x22; as well as individuals who apply for licenses, to submit fingerprints to &#x22;to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and any governmental agency or entity authorized to receive such information for a State and national criminal history background check.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806120007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:06:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x22;Feminist&#x22; Marc Rudov believes &#x22;most American women are as shallow&#x22; as &#x3C;em&#x3E;Sex in the City&#x3C;/em&#x3E; characters  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806020005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The O&#x27;Reilly Factor&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Marc Rudov said men should boycott the Sex and the City movie and would not see it because &#x22;paying to hear women whine is as stupid as paying for cobwebs, because you can get them both at home for free.&#x22; When Bill O&#x27;Reilly asked Margaret Hoover whether she believed &#x22;that most American women are as shallow as&#x22; the four main characters in the movie, Rudov interrupted: &#x22;I do.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806020005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:35:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Confronted on &#x3C;em&#x3E;GMA&#x3C;/em&#x3E; with &#x22;stereotypical bitch&#x22; statement about Clinton, Beck said &#x22;probably a better word was &#x27;nag&#x27; &#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Good Morning America&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, ABC News&#x27; Claire Shipman confronted Glenn Beck with his remark in March 2007 that Sen. Hillary Clinton is &#x22;the stereotypical bitch.&#x22; Beck responded, in part, that &#x22;probably a better word was &#x27;nag.&#x27; &#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:54:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Guest host on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Beck&#x3C;/em&#x3E; suggests if Obama elected, political correctness will kill comedy: &#x22;[E]veryone will be so scared of saying anything&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Glenn Beck&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, guest host Michael Graham discussed political correctness in comedy with comedian Nick DiPaolo. Asking DiPaolo if his &#x22;comedian friends&#x22; thought that &#x22;if we have a President Obama, comedy will be dead,&#x22; Graham said, &#x22;[E]veryone will be so scared of saying anything,&#x22; and added: &#x22;You&#x27;ll be scared to order blackened red fish, because you&#x27;re afraid that an African-American or Native American will beat the crap out of you for it.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 12:51:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blitzer misrepresented McCain&#x27;s position on &#x22;a constitutional amendment on the issue of marriage&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805280006</link>
<description>While discussing Sen. John McCain&#x27;s position on gay marriage, Wolf Blitzer said: &#x22;Because on that issue, he doesn&#x27;t really disagree all that much with [Sens. Hillary] Clinton or [Barack] Obama. He opposes a constitutional amendment on the issue of marriage, is that right?&#x22; CBN&#x27;s David Brody replied: &#x22;That&#x27;s right.&#x22; In fact, McCain supports amendments to state constitutions to ban same-sex marriage and would also support under certain circumstances an amendment to the federal Constitution banning same-sex marriage.     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805280006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:39:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP misled on McCain&#x27;s position on &#x22;an amendment to the Constitution to ban same-sex unions&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805220008</link>
<description>The Associated Press reported that Sen. John McCain &#x22;opposes an amendment to the Constitution to ban same-sex unions.&#x22; In fact, in a March appearance on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, McCain said he supports amendments to state constitutions to ban same-sex marriage and would also support an amendment to the federal Constitution banning same-sex marriage if necessary.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805220008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 18:38:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UPDATED: CNN&#x27;s Castellanos on Clinton as &#x22;white bitch&#x22;: &#x22;[S]ome women, by the way, are named that and it&#x27;s accurate&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805210002</link>
<description>Discussing Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s comments regarding sexism in the media&#x27;s coverage of her presidential campaign, CNN&#x27;s Jeffrey Toobin referred to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column that &#x22;talked about some of the humor in the campaign, and the punch line was a line that was -- that Hillary Clinton was a &#x27;white bitch.&#x27; &#x22; CNN political contributor Alex Castellanos asserted, &#x22;And some women, by the way, are named that and it&#x27;s accurate.&#x22;    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805210002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:15:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In discussion of DeGeneres&#x27; marriage announcement, Fox News host Gutfeld equated &#x22;public exhortations of love&#x22; with talking about bowel movements  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805200008</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Red Eye&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Greg Gutfeld criticized Ellen DeGeneres&#x27; announcement that she plans to marry Portia de Rossi: &#x22;For me, public exhortations of love are no different than telling everyone how great your bowel movements are since switching to All-Bran -- no one gives a [bleep] except you.&#x22; Gutfeld then said: &#x22;And so, this is why I never discuss my marriage with anyone, which is the main reason why John Stamos and I are so happy together. And if you disagree with me, then you, sir, are worse than Hitler.&#x22; But Gutfeld himself has engaged in &#x22;public exhortations of love&#x22; and has talked about his wife. In addition to writing about his wife in a book, according to a 2005 &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Observer&#x3C;/em&#x3E; item, Gutfeld &#x22;talks incessantly and adoringly of his 24-year-old Russian bride, Elena, and carries with him an envelope chock-full of photos.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805200008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:33:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Costello reported that McCain &#x22;would&#x22; support AZ ban on same-sex marriage, but not that he did in 2006 -- and it lost  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805190006</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Carol Costello said that Sen. John McCain &#x22;told reporters ... he would support a [same-sex marriage] ban in his own state of Arizona in November,&#x22; without noting that McCain previously supported such a ban in Arizona that was rejected by the state&#x27;s voters in 2006.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805190006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 16:44:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>