<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Claire Shipman</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/claire_shipman</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Claire Shipman</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Confronted on &#x3C;em&#x3E;GMA&#x3C;/em&#x3E; with &#x22;stereotypical bitch&#x22; statement about Clinton, Beck said &#x22;probably a better word was &#x27;nag&#x27; &#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Good Morning America&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, ABC News&#x27; Claire Shipman confronted Glenn Beck with his remark in March 2007 that Sen. Hillary Clinton is &#x22;the stereotypical bitch.&#x22; Beck responded, in part, that &#x22;probably a better word was &#x27;nag.&#x27; &#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 20:54:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media trot out  gender stereotypes in discussion of Elizabeth Edwards&#x27; comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707190001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707190001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:04:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will media acknowledge they were too credulous in touting Rove&#x27;s pre-election optimism?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611100003</link>
<description>Contrary to Karl Rove&#x27;s pre-election assertions -- which the media accorded significance despited his presumable responsibility to express optimism -- Democrats won control of both houses of Congress. This raises the question of whether the media were wrong in treating Rove&#x27;s optimistic predictions as anything more than a job requirement.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611100003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Nov 2006 20:10:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Before midterms, media downplayed potential Dem gains in House and Senate, touting GOP&#x27;s &#x22;formidable&#x22; and &#x22;stunning&#x22; get-out-the-vote campaign; will they revisit?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611090001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611090001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:00:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Shipman suggested Democratic-controlled Congress would result in &#x22;a culture of gridlock,&#x22; misled on Democrats&#x27; tax position</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611070017</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Good Morning
America&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Claire Shipman warned that &#x22;we&#x27;re still likely,
if the Democrats get the House, to see a culture of gridlock&#x22; because
&#x22;[n]either side will have the 60 votes in the Senate they would need to
really get things done.&#x22; Shipman did not inform viewers of the number of
issues on the GOP legislative agenda that went unaddressed in this
congressional session.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611070017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:18:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media figures touted McCain&#x27;s recent &#x22;straight talk&#x22; on Iraq, ignored his repeated inconsistency</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240007</link>
<description>In recent days, media figures have touted, as an example of his self-styled &#x22;straight talk,&#x22; Sen. John McCain&#x27;s August 22 criticism of the Bush administration&#x27;s overly optimistic rhetoric on the war in Iraq. However, these media figures not only overlooked McCain&#x27;s own optimistic forecasts as the war began in 2003; they also ignored his recent defense of the White House against criticism that President Bush has mischaracterized the situation on the ground there.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:17:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media outlets suggested Sen. Clinton&#x27;s critique of Rumsfeld was motivated purely by politics</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608060001</link>
<description>Several news outlets portrayed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s harsh criticism of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld as a purely political maneuver to &#x22;find the exact middle&#x22; in the Democratic Party or to position herself for a potential 2008 presidential run.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608060001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Aug 2006 11:50:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Shipman on Gore: &#x22;[J]ust look at his face. I don&#x27;t think any of us ... could take him at his word&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606040001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, ABC News&#x27; Claire Shipman said of former Vice President Al Gore, &#x22;[J]ust look at his face. I don&#x27;t think any of us watching your interview could take him at his word.&#x22; Host George Stephanopoulos, who had interviewed Gore earlier, asked Shipman whether journalists should &#x22;take [Gore] at [his] word&#x22; about his statement, &#x22;I have no plans to be a candidate for president again.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606040001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:10:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Stephanopoulos and Shipman touted Snow&#x27;s walk-in access, but Snow said predecessors had it, too</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605010002</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, ABC News&#x27; Claire Shipman credited incoming White House press secretary Tony Snow with having &#x22;managed to negotiate ... a seat at the decision-making table.&#x22; Host George Stephanopoulos agreed, saying, &#x22;I talked to him at the end of the week. He insists that he&#x27;s got walk-in privileges.&#x22; However, Snow himself has said he will have the same access to President Bush as his predecessors.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605010002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 May 2006 13:13:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Shipman: &#x22;Probably one of the first things&#x22; Snow is going to do is change White House TV channels from Fox News</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604270004</link>
<description>ABC News&#x27; Claire Shipman said that when Tony Snow takes over as White House press secretary in early May, &#x22;[p]robably one of the first things he&#x27;s going to do&#x22; is tune White House televisions to outlets other than Fox News. She explained that he would likely do this &#x22;because he knows that this White House needs another point of view,&#x22; but offered no other evidence to support her prediction.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604270004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:42:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>