<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - CNN Live</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/cnn_live</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: CNN Live</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>NBC&#x27;s Mitchell falsely suggested Obama was discussing abortion when he made &#x22;punished with a baby&#x22; comment  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803310013</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, NBC News&#x27; Andrea Mitchell falsely suggested that Sen. Barack Obama was discussing abortion when he said of his two daughters at a March 29 campaign event: &#x22;I don&#x27;t want them punished with a baby.&#x22; In fact, as CNN reported, Obama&#x27;s comments were in response to &#x22;a question about how his administration, if he&#x27;s elected, would deal with the issue of HIV and AIDS and also sexually transmitted diseases with young girls.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803310013</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:10:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NBC, &#x3C;em&#x3E;L.A. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Gannett labeled House report &#x22;bipartisan,&#x22; but most of it was written by Republicans</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608250006</link>
<description>Various print and television news outlets discussing a House report of U.S. intelligence on Iran characterized the report as &#x22;bipartisan&#x22; without noting that it was primarily written by Republican staff members and came under criticism from House Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608250006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:49:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Crowley suggests anti-war Dems want to leave Iraq &#x22;before the job is done&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080006</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Candy Crowley reported that Sen. Joe Lieberman is &#x22;opposed to leaving [Iraq] before the job is done.&#x22; But Crowley&#x27;s description of Lieberman&#x27;s stance on the Iraq war falsely suggested that those calling for the withdrawal of U.S. forces want to abandon &#x22;the job&#x22; of establishing a stable, secure, and democratic Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:28:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s King, Kagan echoed Republican falsehoods on Wilson&#x27;s trip to Niger</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607150003</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Daryn Kagan and John King repeated two falsehoods frequently advanced by conservatives to attack former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV and his wife, former CIA operative Valerie Plame: that Wilson &#x22;did say in one television interview, and ... intimated in some others, that the vice president had sent him to Niger&#x22; to investigate reports that Iraq had sought to purchase yellowcake uranium from that country, and that the Senate Intelligence Committee found that Plame &#x22;sent&#x22; Wilson on the trip to Niger.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607150003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:22:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN and other outlets ignored Hagel&#x27;s denunciation of GOP &#x22;focus group-tested buzz words like &#x27;cut and run&#x27; &#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606220010</link>
<description>While CNN continued to hype the divisions among Democrats on the issue of U.S. redeployment from Iraq, stemming from the debate over two Senate proposals on the issue, the network entirely ignored a recent display of dissention within the Republican Party, as did Fox News and MSNBC.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606220010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:25:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why are the media depicting GOP support for unpopular war as a political winner?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606210005</link>
<description>As Senate Democrats debate two proposals regarding U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, news outlets have gone out of their way to frame the Democratic differences over how soon to redeploy forces as politically favorable for the Republicans while not reporting that the Democrats&#x27; position is shared by a majority of Americans, that the war supported by Republicans is deeply unpopular with the American public, and that the GOP&#x27;s alternative plan appears to involve remaining in Iraq indefinitely.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606210005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:15:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN falsely reported climate change skeptic Gray &#x22;predicted last year&#x27;s hurricane season better than the National Hurricane Center&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606090011</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;CNN Live Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN reporter Mary Snow falsely claimed that &#x22;renowned forecaster&#x22; William Gray &#x22;accurately predicted last year&#x27;s hurricane season better than the National Hurricane Center.&#x22; Gray is a scientist from Colorado  State University who has spoken against the notion that human beings are responsible for global warming.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606090011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:41:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will media report facts undermining Bush administration&#x27;s &#x22;reasonable basis&#x22; defense of spy program&#x27;s legality?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601250001</link>
<description>Numerous media outlets have cited Gen. Michael V. Hayden&#x27;s defense of the Bush administration&#x27;s warrantless domestic surveillance program while ignoring a Justice Department statement from June 2002 that contradicted Hayden&#x27;s claims. Now that the statement has surfaced, will those media outlets now report the facts undermining Hayden&#x27;s defense?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601250001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:23:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>