<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Cokie Roberts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/cokie_roberts</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Cokie Roberts</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>NPR analyst Cokie Roberts apparently unaware that McCain said he is &#x22;glad to have&#x22; Hagee endorsement  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804210002</link>
<description>Responding to a question about whether Sen. John McCain was &#x22;maintaining the endorsement&#x22; of controversial televangelist John Hagee. NPR&#x27;s Cokie Roberts asserted: &#x22;Well, he says that it was a mistake to seek and accept the endorsement. So I -- what does that mean? I don&#x27;t know if that means that he has -- maintains it or not.&#x22; In fact, when asked if he &#x22;no longer want[ed]&#x22; Hagee&#x27;s endorsement, McCain stated: &#x22;I&#x27;m glad to have his endorsement.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804210002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:10:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Discussing &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/CBS poll, Cokie Roberts, Reuters&#x27; Decker claimed McCain is ahead of, or even with, Obama, Clinton -- poll says otherwise  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070009</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, while discussing the latest &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/CBS News poll, Cokie Roberts asserted that Sen. John McCain is &#x22;even or winning in the polls.&#x22; On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Reuters&#x27; Jon Decker similarly stated that McCain is &#x22;running either ahead of both&#x22; Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama &#x22;or running even with both of them.&#x22; But neither Roberts nor Decker mentioned that in that same poll, both Clinton and Obama beat McCain in hypothetical head-to-head match-ups.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:26:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kurtz, NPR&#x27;s Roberts cited &#x3C;em&#x3E;NYT&#x3C;/em&#x3E; poll showing public trusts generals, but not &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; poll showing skepticism of Petraeus&#x27; report</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709100005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709100005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:39:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring bipartisan criticism of administration, media warn that U.S. attorneys investigation could backfire on Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703260010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703260010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:54:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Cokie Roberts: Dems&#x27; &#x22;fair trade&#x22; advocacy puts party &#x22;on the wrong side of history&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701080003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701080003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:36:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stumping for the GOP? Media figures uncritically linked Iraq war with fight against terrorism</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608140005</link>
<description>In the wake of Ned Lamont&#x27;s victory over Sen. Joe Lieberman and the news that British authorities had arrested several suspects in the foiled British terror plot, a number of media figures have linked the Iraq war with the effort to combat terrorism -- echoing the Republican talking point that Iraq is the &#x22;central front&#x22; in the fight against terrorism.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608140005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:50:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Roberts: &#x22;Disaster&#x22; for party if Democrats nominate candidate who agrees with Americans on Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608060002</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Cokie Roberts asserted that it would be &#x22;a disaster for the Democratic Party&#x22; and would lead to &#x22;chaos&#x22; if businessman Ned Lamont were to defeat Sen. Joseph Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic Senate primary on August 8, thereby &#x22;pushing the party to the left&#x22; and sending a message to other senators that &#x22;[t]he only smart thing to do here is play to your base.&#x22; However, as Sam Donaldson noted, opposition to the war is not simply playing to the base, &#x22;it&#x27;s playing to the country,&#x22; since the majority of the American public opposes the war in Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608060002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:12:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>