<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Contraception</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/contraception</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Contraception</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly: &#x22;Birth control is not a medical condition, it is a choice&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807200002</link>
<description>Discussing the issue of whether health insurance plans that cover Viagra should also cover birth control, Fox News&#x27; Bill O&#x27;Reilly asserted: &#x22;Viagra is used to help a medical condition -- that&#x27;s why it&#x27;s covered. Birth control is not a medical condition, it is a choice.&#x22; But O&#x27;Reilly&#x27;s assertion is contradicted by professional medical associations that have stated that pregnancy is a medical condition and that &#x22;[c]ontraception is medically necessary&#x22; for women.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807200002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:44:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; falsely claimed that &#x22;&#x26;nbsp;&#x27;morning-after&#x27; contraception pill&#x22; is &#x22;abortion-inducing&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:23:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial falsely presented current state of Plan B controversy, Sens. Clinton and Murray&#x27;s block on FDA nominee</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070008</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial claimed that &#x22;[t]he FDA and [Dr. Andrew] von Eschenbach have decided that women 18 and over should have &#x22;access&#x22; to the contraceptive pill known as Plan B, &#x22;while younger women can still get it with a prescription,&#x22; and that Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Patty Murray are &#x22;blocking&#x22; [von Eschenbach&#x27;s] nomination [to head the FDA] until the FDA agrees to make &#x22;Plan B ... available without a prescription and without any restrictions on age or access.&#x22; Both assertions are false.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:46:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s &#x22;Closer Look&#x22; at Plan B controversy aired conservatives&#x27; safety concerns, ignored FDA scientists&#x27; rejection of them</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605100014</link>
<description>David Muir&#x27;s report on the &#x22;morning-after&#x22; pill, or Plan B, on ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;World News Tonight&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, included a conservative group&#x27;s claim that allowing sales of the pill without a prescription would be unsafe, but provided no scientific evidence to support the claim, while omitting the fact that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff scientists and outside advisory panels have recommended that the FDA approve allowing over-the-counter sales.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605100014</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 18:10:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: Wal-Mart should charge Massachusetts &#x22;lib babes&#x22; $1,000 per pill for emergency contraception</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602160006</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh said that Wal-Mart should charge &#x22;a thousand bucks a pill,&#x22; for emergency contraception pills because &#x22;the last place you want to be is between a ... liberal woman and her morning-after pill.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602160006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:42:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh: &#x22;The last place you want to be is between a liberal who gets herself pregnant and a morning-after pill&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602030005</link>
<description>Commenting on a Massachusetts lawsuit filed against Wal-Mart over its refusal to stock emergency contraception pills, Rush Limbaugh said that &#x22;the most dangerous place you can be is between a liberal woman and her morning-after pill.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602030005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2006 13:14:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hume falsely claimed that &#x22;no one&#x22; had been prosecuted under Connecticut anti-contraceptive law in &#x3C;i&#x3E;Griswold&#x3C;/i&#x3E; case; law prof Kmiec agreed</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510270006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510270006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:33:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Neil Cavuto&#x27;s &#x3C;i&#x3E;Your World&#x3C;/i&#x3E;, Andrea Lafferty cited misleading information on condoms derived from Bush administration propaganda site</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200506080006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200506080006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:06:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough wrongly accused Democrats of seeking to &#x22;abolish&#x22; abstinence programs, cherry-picked opinion poll on sex education</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200505100004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200505100004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 16:19:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who are Karen Brauer and &#x22;Pharmacists for Life&#x22;?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200503300002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200503300002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:54:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Abstinence-only advocate defended misleading curricula with more distortions</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200412080002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200412080002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:27:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Abstinence-only advocates spread falsehoods on cable</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200412030007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200412030007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:25:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>