<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Dan Abrams</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/dan_abrams</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Dan Abrams</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Media outlets -- but not Fox News -- weigh in on doctored photos  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030002</link>
<description>MSNBC and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Editor &#x26;amp; Publisher&#x3C;/em&#x3E; have noted that &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; featured photos of&#x3C;em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Jacques Steinberg and editor Steven Reddicliffe that appeared to have been digitally altered. But Fox News has yet to address the controversy.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:31:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Olbermann, Abrams take on E.D. Hill&#x27;s fist bump comments  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806100006</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s Dan Abrams and Keith Olbermann took issue with Fox News host E.D. Hill&#x27;s suggestion that a fist bump by Sen. Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, might be &#x22;interpret[ed]&#x22; as a &#x22;terrorist first jab,&#x22; with Abrams saying, &#x22;[O]ver at Fox News, if it&#x27;s Obama, it must be something far more sinister.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806100006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:02:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Some MSNBC journalists identify a media double standard in coverage of McCain gaffe; others demonstrate it  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200011</link>
<description>After Chuck Todd acknowledged a media double standard in coverage of Sen. John McCain&#x27;s Al Qaeda-Iran gaffe, CNBC&#x27;s John Harwood asserted on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;I think that at the end of the day, John McCain has got sufficient credibility on that issue that people are not going to look at that and say, &#x27;Oh, John McCain is confused&#x27; or &#x27;John McCain&#x27;s too old&#x27; or &#x27;John McCain doesn&#x27;t get it.&#x27; ... But he obviously can&#x27;t do that too many times or he&#x27;s got a problem.&#x22; Harwood was not alone in misrepresenting or excusing McCain&#x27;s false claim on MSNBC; several MSNBC reporters and anchors have ignored or excused McCain&#x27;s false claim.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:01:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Abrams: &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on Obama&#x27;s youth is &#x22;the ultimate in media arrogance&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802120008</link>
<description>On his MSNBC program, Dan Abrams labeled as a &#x22;non-story&#x22; a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article that suggested that Obama may have exaggerated his account of his past drug use &#x22;to make the challenges he overcame seem more dramatic.&#x22; Abrams stated: &#x22;Any article about his drug use is bad news for Obama. But for the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; to claim deceitful motives just because they couldn&#x27;t find anyone to corroborate his [Obama&#x27;s] youthful indiscretion is the ultimate in media arrogance. And sadly, I predict this story will be just the first in a series of non-stories about his drug use.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802120008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:15:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Radio host John DePetro: White people go to Harlem for &#x22;either&#x22; drugs or prostitutes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710010003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live

with Dan Abrams&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, discussing

Bill O&#x27;Reilly&#x27;s recent controversial comments about his visit to

Sylvia&#x27;s restaurant in Harlem, Rhode

 Island radio host John DePetro stated: &#x22;It was a discussion on race and

we&#x27;re talking about Harlem. And by and

large -- I lived in New York for years --

white people don&#x27;t go to Harlem.&#x22;

He continued: &#x22;If Dan Abrams and John DePetro, Bill O&#x27;Reilly, some

white guys are sitting around a table, and Dan Abrams said, &#x27;Yeah, I was

up in Harlem last night.&#x27; We would think

you were either, a) looking for drugs, or, b) looking for a

prostitute.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710010003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:52:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media blasted Edwards for speech fee but omitted Giuliani speeches, Edwards&#x27; explanation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705230010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705230010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:41:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Abrams failed to challenge disputed assertion that domestic spy program is &#x22;very targeted&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602080005</link>
<description>MSNBC host Dan Abrams failed to challenge the assertion of Kris W. Kobach, a constitutional law professor and former counsel to former Attorney General John Ashcroft, that President Bush&#x27;s controversial domestic spying program dealt only with &#x22;very targeted&#x22; calls. In fact, recent media reports indicate that the program has cast a broad net, monitoring thousands of people with no relationship to Al Qaeda.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602080005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:34:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media largely ignored Fitzgerald revelation that White House may have destroyed emails</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602020012</link>
<description>Few major news outlets have covered the fact -- first reported by the &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Daily News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- that in a letter to I. Lewis &#x22;Scooter&#x22; Libby&#x27;s defense attorneys, special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald said that numerous emails from 2003 are missing from the White House computer archives.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602020012</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:34:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>