<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Daniel Henninger</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/daniel_henninger</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Daniel Henninger</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x27;s &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Henninger called Cindy McCain&#x27;s refusal to release tax returns &#x22;a fairly marginal issue,&#x22; but &#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E; urged Heinz Kerry to release hers  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805110001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Lou Dobbs Tonight&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; deputy editorial page editor Dan Henninger said of Cindy McCain&#x27;s refusal to release her tax returns: &#x22;I think it&#x27;s a fairly marginal issue.&#x22; But in a July 2004 editorial, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; asserted that it was &#x22;past time&#x22; for Sen. John Kerry&#x27;s wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, to release her tax returns, stating, &#x22;Their assets should be disclosed to the voters so that they can assess whether there are any potential conflicts of interest.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805110001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 15:30:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring  researcher&#x27;s caveat, &#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Henninger claimed stem-cell controversy &#x22;[b]asically [...] is  over&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712100004</link>
<description>On Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Journal Editorial Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; deputy editorial page editor Daniel 
Henninger discussed the 
announcement that American and Japanese research teams discovered, in the words 
of the senior American scientist, a &#x22;new way to trick skin cells into acting 
like embryos&#x22; by &#x22;reprogram[ming] skin cells into multipurpose stem cells 
without harming embryos.&#x22; Henninger 
said: &#x22;Basically, the controversy is over. And I think, in retrospect, we should say something on 
behalf of, say, [President] 
George Bush, who vetoed that stem-cell bill.&#x22; However, the senior American 
scientist wrote in a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington 
Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; op-ed that the new developments &#x22;[f]ar from vindicat[e]&#x22; the 
Bush administration&#x27;s policy &#x22;of withholding federal funds from many of those 
working to develop potentially lifesaving embryonic stem cells.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712100004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:52:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media figures warned incoming Democratic majority against aggressive oversight</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:17:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing Drudge and Savage, Dobson and Henninger claimed Foley scandal is &#x22;sort of a joke&#x22; and a &#x22;prank[ ]&#x22; by pages</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610060004</link>
<description>James Dobson and Daniel Henninger both echoed a claim previously made by Matt Drudge and Michael Savage that the sexually explicit communications that Rep. Mark Foley allegedly engaged in with former congressional pages were &#x22;sort of a joke&#x22; or a &#x22;prank[]&#x22; on the part of the former pages.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610060004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Oct 2006 15:57:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Henninger suggested Ahmadinejad&#x27;s views &#x22;correlate with the views of whoever in the CIA leaked the prisons&#x27; existence&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605120004</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; deputy editorial page editor Daniel Henninger suggested that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;secret prisons in Eastern Europe&#x22; do not comport with laws, religious values, or human rights &#x22;correlate[s] with the views of whoever in the CIA leaked the prisons&#x27; existence&#x22; to &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605120004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 12:39:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Henninger: Media responsible for IEDs being weapons of mass destruction by showing their gruesome results</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604070005</link>
<description>In a column for &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s OpinionJournal.com, deputy editorial page editor Daniel Henninger claimed that the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) by insurgents in Iraq &#x22;qualifies as a weapon of mass destruction&#x22; because the &#x22;mass media distribute the dead, dismembered victims into our living rooms morning and night.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604070005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:59:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Henninger repeated false claim that Robb-Silberman report cleared Bush of &#x22;moral crime&#x22; of misleading on Iraq WMD</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603060001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Daniel Henninger repeated the false claim that the Robb-Silverman commission exonerated the Bush administration from the charge that it had misled the public about evidence of Iraq&#x27;s weapons of mass destruction. In fact, the commission did not even consider the question.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603060001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:29:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media figures repeat claim that disclosure rendered NSA surveillance useless</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602150010</link>
<description>Advancing a line put forth by the administration, several conservative media figures have argued that the revelation of President Bush&#x27;s warrantless domestic surveillance program has effectively rendered it worthless because its existence and practices have been disclosed to terrorist groups. However, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has previously noted the absurdity of this claim.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602150010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:31:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Henninger baselessly asserted that public disclosure of spying program made it ineffective; news reports indicate it already was</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602130002</link>
<description>In his February 10 column, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Daniel Henninger baselessly asserted that the public disclosure of President Bush&#x27;s warrantless domestic surveillance program had made it ineffective. However, news reports suggest that, even before the program&#x27;s public disclosure, it had been ineffective.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602130002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:05:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Henninger: &#x22;[U]ngracious&#x22; Democrats &#x22;sat on their hands&#x22; during State of the Union</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602060008</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; deputy editorial page editor Daniel Henninger claimed that Democrats were &#x22;very ungracious&#x22; during President Bush&#x27;s January 31 State of the Union address for &#x22;refusing to applaud anything this president said.&#x22; In fact, the Democrats applauded more than a dozen times during Bush&#x27;s speech.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602060008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:06:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal Editorial Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; distorted methane study, falsely suggesting it undermined global warming science</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601250004</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Paul Gigot falsely claimed that a new study by the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics undermines the science behind global warming.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601250004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:15:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>