<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - David Asman</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/david_asman</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: David Asman</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>What  to expect from Fox Business Network</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:16:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News provided platform for Matalin, Boehner to claim that Americans don&#x27;t support Iraq withdrawal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110009</link>
<description>On Fox News, Republican
strategist Mary Matalin asserted that &#x22;the message of [the 2006] election
... wasn&#x27;t to withdraw&#x22; from Iraq, and Rep. John Boehner claimed
that &#x22;bring[ing] the troops home&#x22; is not &#x22;what the American
people want.&#x22; In fact,&#x3C;strong&#x3E; &#x3C;/strong&#x3E;the
national exit poll conducted for the leading news organizations in 2006 found
that a majority of &#x22;the American public&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;was&#x3C;/em&#x3E; in favor of withdrawing troops from Iraq, and recent polls demonstrate that most
Americans favor some type of troop withdrawal from Iraq -- facts that Fox News hosts
failed to mention in their discussions with Matalin and Boehner.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:09:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Your World&#x3C;/em&#x3E; smackdown: Guest flatly refuted Asman claim that he is &#x22;all for&#x22; global warming</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612220008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612220008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:27:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly, Asman baselessly linked &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; employee cutbacks to stories on bank tracking, NSA spying</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607210006</link>
<description>On Fox News and his radio show, Bill O&#x27;Reilly falsely claimed that, because of criticism &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has received for publishing a &#x22;terror finance story,&#x22; the newspaper &#x22;announced ... it was cutting 25 percent of its work force.&#x22; Based on figures provided in a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article, the announced reductions amount to just over 2 percent of the work force. Similarly, on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Your World&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, guest host David Asman falsely suggested the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; cutbacks were a result of the public&#x27;s reaction to the paper&#x27;s recent reporting. In fact, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; announced a plan to cut half its production staff by 2017 in September 2004, well before it reported on warrantless wiretapping or the Bush administration&#x27;s bank-monitoring program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607210006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:39:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; North Korea coverage: Blame Clinton, no progressives allowed</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070013</link>
<description>In their July 6 coverage of North Korea&#x27;s missile tests, Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Big Story with John Gibson&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Your World with Neil Cavuto&#x3C;/em&#x3E; featured segments on whether former President Bill Clinton is to blame for the current situation in North Korea. Neither program, however, hosted any Democrats or progressives to discuss Clinton&#x27;s alleged culpability, nor did they examine the role the Bush administration&#x27;s policies on North Korea have played in the situation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:36:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News hosts go off-message in hyping N. Korea missile tests</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070001</link>
<description>Though White House press secretary Tony Snow criticized &#x22;attempts to try to describe&#x22; North Korea&#x27;s recent missile tests &#x22;in breathless World War III terms,&#x22; Fox News hosts, analysts, and guests repeatedly suggested using force to prevent North Korea from conducting further missile tests and acquiring more nuclear weapons-grade material, with one military analyst even advocating the &#x22;nuclear&#x22; option.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jul 2006 09:22:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Top falsehoods about &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and Bush bank-tracking program</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290003</link>
<description>In response to the reports describing a Treasury Department program designed to monitor international financial transactions for terrorist activity, President Bush and other White House officials lashed out at the media -- and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; in particular -- for purportedly undermining the government&#x27;s antiterrorism efforts. But as with the disclosure of the Bush administration&#x27;s warrantless domestic surveillance and domestic call-tracking programs, the administration and its supporters in the media have relied on numerous false and misleading claims to support their arguments.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:53:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media conservatives baselessly claimed that many Democrats urged &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; not to run bank tracking story</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606270009</link>
<description>Several conservative media figures baselessly asserted that &#x22;a lot&#x22; of Democrats, including Rep. John P. Murtha (D-PA), had asked &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; not to publish an article disclosing a secret counterterrorism program that involves tracking bank records. But &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; executive editor Bill Keller named only three people outside the administration (two of whom were Democrats) who Keller said contacted the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; regarding the story; moreover, he did not say whether the two Democrats advocated against publishing the article.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606270009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:34:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In special that &#x22;gets to the bottom&#x22; of global warming debate, Fox featured only skeptics, a small minority among scientists</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605230001</link>
<description>In his introduction for the May 21 Fox News special on global warming, host David Asman left viewers with the impression that there is a significant divide among scientists regarding the cause of global warming. &#x22;Today, almost all scientists agree that there is global warming,&#x22; he said, &#x22;but there is no scientific consensus about what causes global warming or how it will affect our lives.&#x22; But, while Asman went on to interview numerous experts skeptical of the threat posed by global warming or whether human activity causes it, he never informed viewers that those skeptics represent a small minority within the scientific community.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605230001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 20:12:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In new global warming special, Fox News interviews scientists with industry ties, records of misinformation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605190003</link>
<description>On May 21, Fox News will air a one-hour special, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Global Warming: The Debate Continues&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, in which host David Asman will &#x22;speak with scientists who are skeptical of what they view as alarmist fears about climate change.&#x22; Among the roster of contributors are several global warming skeptics with ties to the energy industry and records of misinformation on the issue.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605190003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 10:35:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Olbermann handed Asman, Yost &#x22;Worst Person&#x22; bronze for claiming journalists won&#x27;t report heroism while covering Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605170013</link>
<description>On MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Countdown&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Keith Olbermann awarded third place in his nightly &#x22;Worst Person in the World&#x22; awards to Fox News host David Asman and &#x3C;em&#x3E;American Spectator&#x3C;/em&#x3E; writer Mark Yost for comments they made on Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Your World with Neil Cavuto&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. Asman stated that journalists covering the Iraq war are &#x22;not going to report on a lot of heroism.&#x22; In response, Yost suggested that reporters are &#x22;somewhat embarrassed by people or feel lesser of themselves by people who do incredibly heroic things.&#x22; Olbermann remarked: &#x22;That&#x27;s right, boys. That&#x27;s why the media covered up all the heroism on Flight 93.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605170013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:31:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring two polls to the contrary, Asman falsely claimed &#x22;the one poll that we&#x27;ve seen&#x22; on NSA phone record program &#x22;shows that over 60 percent&#x22; support it</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605170003</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; David Asman falsely claimed that &#x22;the one poll we&#x27;ve seen&#x22; on the National Security Agency (NSA) program to collect phone call records of tens of millions of Americans &#x22;shows that over 60 percent, a big majority, believe this is not spying, that it is not violating Americans&#x27; rights.&#x22; Asman was presumably referring to a flawed &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/ABC News poll that indicated that 63 percent of respondents said the program is &#x22;acceptable.&#x22; However, Asman ignored the fact that &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/Gallup and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; have each released polls on the topic indicating that a majority of Americans disapprove of the reported data collection program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605170003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 11:52:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;American Spectator&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Yost: Journalists are &#x22;somewhat embarrassed ... by people who do incredibly heroic things&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605160005</link>
<description>On Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Your World&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, guest host David Asman stated that journalists covering the Iraq war are &#x22;not going to report on a lot of heroism.&#x22; In response, &#x3C;em&#x3E;American Spectator&#x3C;/em&#x3E; contributing writer Mark Yost claimed that he had been told that people are &#x22;somewhat embarrassed by people or feel lesser of themselves by people who do incredibly heroic things,&#x22; and that &#x22;they don&#x27;t make a big deal of it, because they themselves know that maybe, perhaps, in the same situation they wouldn&#x27;t have done the same thing.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605160005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 12:40:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Porn World with Neil Cavuto: Fox business show featured more scantily clad women</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605150012</link>
<description>In a segment of Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Your World with Neil Cavuto&#x3C;/em&#x3E; titled &#x22;Porn to Run,&#x22; guest host David Asman interviewed Steven Hirsch, co-founder and CEO of Vivid Entertainment Group, about the business of Internet pornography. Throughout the interview, the broadcast was split-screened with footage of scantily clad women pole-dancing and stripping in front of men. &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has previously noted that &#x3C;em&#x3E;Your World&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, ostensibly a business show, has often aired photographs and videos of scantily clad women and blurred images of nude women.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605150012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 19:01:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Asman: Getting 30,000 centrifuges needed to process highly enriched uranium &#x22;is going to be a cakewalk&#x22; for Iran; nuclear experts disagree</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604250003</link>
<description>Fox News host David Asman claimed without basis that &#x22;getting to the 30,000 centrifuges&#x22; Iran needs to produce a significant amount of weapons-grade nuclear material &#x22;is going to be a cakewalk,&#x22; adding: &#x22;Are we going to have to wait until there&#x27;s a mushroom cloud over Jerusalem before we take a hit in Iran?&#x22; But &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; noted that Western nuclear analysts have determined that Iran &#x22;still lack[s] the parts and materials to make droves of the highly complex [centrifuges] which can spin uranium into fuel rich enough for use in nuclear reactors or atom bombs.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604250003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:09:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>