<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - David Brooks</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/david_brooks</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: David Brooks</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Brooks thinks Obama wouldn&#x27;t seem to &#x22;fit[] in naturally&#x22; at an Applebee&#x27;s salad bar -- maybe because Applebee&#x27;s doesn&#x27;t have them  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806030004</link>
<description>On MSNBC, David Brooks asserted that &#x22;less educated&#x22; and &#x22;downscale&#x22; people &#x22;look at [Sen. Barack] Obama, and they don&#x27;t see anything,&#x22; adding: &#x22;And so, Obama&#x27;s problem is he doesn&#x27;t seem like the kind of guy who could go into an Applebee&#x27;s salad bar, and people think he fits in naturally there.&#x22; Applebee&#x27;s officials have confirmed to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters &#x3C;/em&#x3E;that its restaurants do not have salad bars.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806030004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2008 15:31:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;NewsHour&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Shields and Brooks ignored &#x22;aging movie actress,&#x22; other statements in stressing McCain&#x27;s purported &#x22;places of disagreement&#x22; with Bush&#x27;s foreign policy  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803310006</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mark Shields asserted that Sen. John McCain &#x22;emphasized a lot of places of disagreement&#x22; with President Bush during his March 26 foreign policy speech, including &#x22;the sense of communality and collegiality among nations, reaching to the allies.&#x22; But neither Shields nor the others in the discussion noted any of the highly critical statements McCain made about U.S. allies who opposed the Iraq war.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803310006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:37:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brooks, Broder praised McCain&#x27;s rebuke of Bush-style unilateralism, but didn&#x27;t mention McCain&#x27;s past comments attacking allies who opposed Iraq war</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803300003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; David Brooks asserted that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s March 26 foreign policy speech &#x22;was so important because he broke with Bush on several ways&#x22; and described one of those ways as, &#x22;Should the U.S. go it alone on certain issues? He said no, we are -- we need a strong America, but in the community of nations. And he detailed that.&#x22; Similarly,&#x3C;em&#x3E; The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s David Broder wrote that McCain &#x22;outlin[ed] a vastly different approach from President Bush&#x27;s&#x22; in the speech, in part by offering a &#x22;repudiation of unilateralism.&#x22; Yet neither Brooks nor Broder accounted for any of the statements McCain made during the run-up to the Iraq war about France, Germany, and Belgium, which revealed a very different attitude to U.S. allies.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803300003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 18:03:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Brooks suggested McCain &#x22;only wrote two letters&#x22; as Commerce chairman  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802240003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, discussing the &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article about Sen. John McCain&#x27;s relationship with a lobbyist, David Brooks said he &#x22;do[esn&#x27;t] really understand the case&#x22; involving McCain and the letters he wrote to the Federal Communications Commission about an issue involving Paxson Communications, then suggested that McCain &#x22;only wrote two letters&#x22; as chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee. But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reported that McCain sent a series of letters to the FCC in a separate case, including &#x22;an unusually blunt letter to the head of the Federal Communications Commission, warning that he would try to overhaul the agency if it closed a broadcast ownership loophole.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802240003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:31:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brooks&#x27; advice to Obama, &#x22;Go visit a factory for once&#x22;; but Obama spoke at a General Motors plant days earlier  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802170002</link>
<description>Responding to Chris Matthews&#x27; question, &#x22;[W]ill Barack Obama&#x27;s oratorical ability on the lectern in front of big rooms continue to be his winning edge?&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; David Brooks said: &#x22;Yes, but he&#x27;s got to get away from colleges. Go visit a factory for once.&#x22; In fact, Obama delivered what his campaign called a &#x22;major economic policy address&#x22; at a Wisconsin General Motors factory a few days before Brooks made his comment.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802170002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:24:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Brooks:  &#x22;Telling the truth is a skill&#x22; and &#x22;McCain is  well-practiced&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711130006</link>
<description>In his &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, 
David Brooks wrote that Sen. John 
McCain &#x22;led the charge against [convicted lobbyist] 
Jack Abramoff.&#x22; In fact, as chairman of the Indian Affairs Committee, McCain 
reportedly steered the Abramoff investigation away from examining any potential 
wrongdoing by his Republican colleagues. Brooks also asserted that &#x22;[w]hile 
others ignored the spending binge, McCain was among the fiscal hawks.&#x22; But while 
McCain originally opposed the 2003 Bush tax cuts on fiscal policy grounds, he subsequently voted to 
extend them.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711130006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:02:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x27;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Brooks admitted to pulling number of possible Iraqi deaths &#x22;out of the air&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707220001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707220001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:02:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On PBS, Brooks described Bush&#x27;s whitewashing of Iraq war history as &#x22;accurate&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701120006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701120006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:38:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring his own employer, &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;&#x3C;em&#x3E; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Brooks said Ford&#x27;s pardon of Nixon &#x22;is now universally celebrated&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030014</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:48:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>For warbloggers, &#x22;The Media Are the Enemy&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612220004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612220004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:26:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will media challenge first lady&#x27;s criticisms of media -- now refuted by conservatives -- during interviews?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612200009</link>
<description>Given that conservatives such as
Rich Lowry and Tony Blankley have challenged Laura Bush&#x27;s assertion that
the media have failed to cover &#x22;a lot of good things that are
happening&#x22; in Iraq, will the media similarly take on the first
lady&#x27;s baseless -- and at times outright false -- attacks on the media?

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612200009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:01:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brooks sees Iraq situation as no-lose for McCain</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612180009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612180009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:49:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In &#x22;Eight for &#x27;08&#x22; series, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chris Matthews Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E; followed McCain gush-fest by bashing Hillary Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612050003</link>
<description>Two weeks after gushing over
John McCain&#x27;s likely presidential bid, the host and panelists on &#x3C;em&#x3E;The&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chris
Matthews Show &#x3C;/em&#x3E;concluded that some
of Hillary Rodham&#x3C;em&#x3E; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Clinton&#x27;s greatest
perceived strengths as a presidential candidate
were really weaknesses.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612050003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Dec 2006 20:13:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews and guests admired McCain&#x27;s leadership on Iraq plan, failed to note questions of feasibility, McCain motives</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611200008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611200008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:27:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Brooks lauded Santorum&#x27;s anti-poverty work, ignored his charity-related controversies</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310001</link>
<description>In a recent column, David Brooks wrote that if Sen.
Rick Santorum loses his Pennsylvania Senate seat, it&#x27;s &#x22;probably
good news in Pennsylvania&#x27;s
bobo suburbs&#x22; but &#x22;certainly bad for poor people around the
world.&#x22; Brooks, however, did not mention the controversy surrounding
Santorum&#x27;s own charity, or his attacks on prominent international
humanitarian groups.



&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:09:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>