<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - David Horowitz</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/david_horowitz</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: David Horowitz</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Horowitz&#x27;s  FrontPageMag.com yet to correct false Princeton  assault story</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190001</link>
<description>FrontPageMag.com, the &#x22;online magazine&#x22; of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, posted an 
excerpt from a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Sun&#x3C;/em&#x3E; 
article published that day detailing allegations by a Princeton University student who claimed he had been 
assaulted because of his conservative views. However, while the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Sun&#x3C;/em&#x3E; updated its story to report that Nava 
admitted to police that &#x22;he fabricated the assault,&#x22; FrontPageMag.com has yet to 
acknowledge that the entire story was fabricated.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:06:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Facts, lies, and Richard Poe</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611170004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611170004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:39:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz made baseless claim that Soros has poured $75 million into midterm elections</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610140003</link>
<description>On Sean Hannity&#x27;s radio show, David Horowitz attacked nonprofit organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and George Soros, baselessly claiming that Soros has &#x22;put $75 million into these congressional elections, and he&#x27;s doing it behind the fa&#x26;#231;ade of -- public interest, tax-exempt, charitable organizations.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610140003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:16:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz, FrontPageMag misrepresented CREW statement on Foley emails to suggest &#x22;obstruction of justice&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610100017</link>
<description>In a press release alleging possible &#x22;criminal obstruction of justice&#x22; in the Mark Foley scandal, David Horowitz&#x27;s FrontPageMag.com claimed that Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington said it has held &#x22;incriminating e-mails revealing Foley&#x27;s sexual misconduct since at least July 2006.&#x22; In fact, CREW has explicitly stated that it both received the emails and sent them to the FBI on the same day in July.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610100017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:36:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Robertson to Horowitz: There&#x27;s &#x22;sort of a shadowy group called &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. Tell me about that one&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:08:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>After three weeks, still no sign of Horowitz&#x27;s and Poe&#x27;s &#x22;exhaustive&#x22; rebuttals to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; debunking of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240006</link>
<description>Three weeks after promising an &#x22;exhaustive&#x22; and &#x22;full-blown&#x22; response to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; extensive critique of their new book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, David Horowitz and Richard Poe have yet to issue one. Meanwhile, Horowitz and Poe wrote a letter to &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; containing a straw man argument to attack Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:59:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A week passes, more promises from Horowitz and Poe, but still no &#x22;exhaustive&#x22; rebuttal to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090013</link>
<description>David Horowitz and Richard Poe have yet to issue their promised rebuttal to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; item documenting doctored quotes, shoddy scholarship, factual errors, and baseless insinuations in their book &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. Poe has claimed, however, that he and Horowitz are working on an &#x22;effective&#x22; rebuttal and vowed that &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;will regret having asked for it.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2006 18:06:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz: Democrats are &#x22;apologists for terrorists,&#x22; &#x22;leftists now support[] Hezbollah&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090012</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, David Horowitz claimed that Democrats are &#x22;apologists for terrorists&#x22; and that &#x22;the [Joe] Lieberman campaign is the final nail in the coffin of any kind of a centrist Democratic Party.&#x22; Horowitz also said that &#x22;leftists now support[] Hezbollah.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2006 17:47:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Hill and Doocy confronted Horowitz with &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; research</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, E.D. Hill and Steve Doocy confronted David Horowitz with &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s August 2 item exposing the &#x22;doctored quotes, shoddy scholarship, factual errors, and baseless insinuations on matters both small and large&#x22; in Horowitz&#x27;s latest book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:30:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz and Poe promised &#x22;full-blown&#x22; rebuttals to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; debunking of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- so what&#x27;s taking so long?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:17:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz falsely accused &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; of engaging in &#x22;crass doctoring of conservative statements&#x22; over his defense of Mel Gibson</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070004</link>
<description>David Horowitz falsely accused &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; of &#x22;crass doctoring of conservative statements&#x22; in a response to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; item noting that several conservative media figures -- including Horowitz -- defended Mel Gibson after he made a series of anti-Semitic remarks. In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reprinted verbatim Horowitz&#x27;s defense of Gibson from his appearance on the August 1 edition of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:55:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservative media figures jumping to Mel Gibson&#x27;s defense</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030002</link>
<description>Conservative media figures have jumped to the defense of Mel Gibson after he made a series of anti-Semitic remarks when he was arrested for driving under the influence.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:40:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Horowitz dodged charges that he &#x22;didn&#x27;t even write or research&#x22; portions of his book</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608020010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, David Horowitz would not answer accusations that he &#x22;admitted on the air&#x22; that he &#x22;didn&#x27;t even write or research ... parts of&#x22; his book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Professors&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. Horowitz also claimed that fellow guest Mark LeVine, a professor at the University of California, Irvine, is &#x22;an apologist for the terrorists.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608020010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:03:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing Lyndon LaRouche, Horowitz and Poe smear 14-year-old George Soros as Nazi &#x22;collaborator&#x22;; new book features doctored quotes, factual errors</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608020003</link>
<description>Echoing the rantings of political extremist Lyndon LaRouche and his followers, David Horowitz and Richard Poe charge in their new book that George Soros was a Nazi &#x22;collaborator in fascist Hungary&#x22; and &#x22;survived [the Holocaust] by assimilating to Nazism&#x22; as a 14-year-old boy. Horowitz and Poe further smear Soros and other progressives by doctoring or distorting quotes and falsely or misleadingly portraying events and statements.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608020003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:52:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz baselessly suggested that domestic spying led to foiling of NYC tunnel plot</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607110009</link>
<description>In his latest column, David Horowitz baselessly suggested that U.S. officials were able to uncover an alleged &#x22;attack by radical Islam&#x22; to bomb tunnels leading into New York City by monitoring the communications of Americans, an apparent reference to the controversy over &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; reporting in December that the administration was monitoring domestic communications without a warrant. In fact, there is no indication, in any reports, that the FBI engaged in the kind of domestic eavesdropping on which the Times reported to uncover the alleged tunnel plot; the communications made in connection with the purported plot apparently did not involve a party inside the United States.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607110009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:18:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>