<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - DaySide</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/dayside</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: DaySide</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Dayside&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Stossel repeated global warming falsehoods</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607100007</link>
<description>Promoting his new book on Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Dayside&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Stossel claimed that global warming is &#x22;[p]robably not&#x22; a &#x22;big problem&#x22; and attacked Al Gore&#x27;s movie on the issue, &#x3C;em&#x3E;An Inconvenient Truth&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, saying, &#x22;Many scientists do not agree,&#x22; that global warming is a &#x22;big problem,&#x22; &#x22;despite what you hear in the Al Gore movie.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607100007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:53:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox guest likened Al Gore&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;An Inconvenient Truth&#x3C;/em&#x3E; to Nazi propaganda films</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240009</link>
<description>On Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Dayside&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Sterling Burnett, senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis, called &#x3C;em&#x3E;An Inconvenient Truth&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- a new documentary on former Vice President Al Gore&#x27;s campaign to raise worldwide awareness of global warming -- &#x22;propaganda&#x22; and added: &#x22;You don&#x27;t go see Joseph Goebbels&#x27; films to see the truth about Nazi Germany. You don&#x27;t want to go see Al Gore&#x27;s film to see the truth about global warming.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 16:09:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media ran amok with &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Clinton marriage article</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240008</link>
<description>Following the publication of a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on the purported state of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and former President Bill Clinton&#x27;s marriage, numerous news outlets ran reports and aired discussions on the story. The 2,000-word article by &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Patrick Healy was based on the accounts of &#x22;some 50 people,&#x22; &#x22;many&#x22; of whom &#x22;were granted anonymity to discuss a relationship for which the Clintons have long sought a zone of privacy.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 15:54:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media ignored convicted Illinois governor&#x27;s Republican affiliation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604180003</link>
<description>On April 17, numerous news outlets -- including NBC, CBS, NPR, and Fox News -- covering former Illinois governor George Ryan&#x27;s conviction on corruption charges failed to mention that he is a Republican. &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; magazine went a step further, omitting Ryan&#x27;s Republican affiliation while reporting that &#x22;the current administration of Democrat Rod Blagojevich is also being investigated.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604180003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:13:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ensor, Hume accepted without question claim that Bush&#x27;s NIE &#x22;declassification&#x22; was legal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604060005</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s David Ensor, reporting on the revelation that President Bush &#x22;authorized&#x22; the disclosure of classified portions of the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate pertaining to Iraq&#x27;s purported weapons of mass destruction, simply asserted without elaboration that unnamed &#x22;experts&#x22; say Bush&#x27;s actions were &#x22;legal,&#x22; and that the president has &#x22;the right&#x22; to declassify such information. Similarly, Fox News&#x27; Brit Hume said that both Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney &#x22;have the legal authority under an executive order signed by the president to make public classified information. So that takes the unauthorized out of it.&#x22; Neither Ensor nor Hume challenged the notion that the president has the authority to leak classified information, questioned whether Bush -- assuming he has that authority -- properly declassified the information, or made any effort to explore the ramifications of the president&#x27;s exercise of that alleged authority.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604060005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Apr 2006 17:45:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media accused liberals of politicizing King funeral, ignored conservatives&#x27; use of Reagan funeral</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090007</link>
<description>Numerous media figures highlighted the alleged &#x22;partisan&#x22; nature of Coretta Scott King&#x27;s funeral but failed to comment on the politicization of Ronald Reagan&#x27;s funeral.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:01:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>