<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Debra J. Saunders</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/debra_j__saunders</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Debra J. Saunders</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Reliable Sources&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Saunders repeated Plame leak distortions</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710230003</link>
<description>On CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;San Francisco Chronicle &#x3C;/em&#x3E;columnist Debra J.
Saunders claimed that former CIA operative Valerie Plame &#x22;was not outed
as part of a vendetta,&#x22; adding: &#x22;It was gossip. We know where this
came from, from Richard Armitage.&#x22; However, Armitage was just one of
several administration officials who disclosed Plame&#x27;s identity to the
press, and special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who investigated the
leak, asserted that &#x22;multiple people in the White House&#x22; engaged in
a &#x22;concerted action&#x22; to &#x22;discredit, punish, or seek revenge
against&#x22; Wilson.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710230003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:50:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Myths and falsehoods about Hillary Rodham Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:12:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media&#x27;s latest anti-Hillary narrative: Ruthless Clinton machine to attempt to destroy Obama</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612190010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612190010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:50:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews continued obsession with &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Clinton marriage article on Sunday show</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605300009</link>
<description>Chris Matthews devoted the first 12 minutes of his 30-minute, NBC-syndicated &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Chris Matthews Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E; to asking his panel 17 questions based on &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article that examined the state of the marriage between Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and former President Bill Clinton. Matthews asserted that Bill Clinton &#x22;doesn&#x27;t get special press scrutiny.&#x22; Panelist and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E; magazine assistant managing editor Michael Duffy also appeared to validate the Times&#x27; decision to publish the story, stating: &#x22;I think if [the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;] hadn&#x27;t done the story, someone else would have.&#x22; And in an appearance on CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Reliable Sources&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;San Francisco Chronicle&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Debra Saunders falsely claimed that the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article only discussed the Clintons&#x27; &#x22;public social lives,&#x22; adding that &#x22;&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; would be derelict if it didn&#x27;t report on this&#x22; because &#x22;it&#x27;s something people want to know about.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605300009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 19:26:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>