<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Donald Lambro</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/donald_lambro</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Donald Lambro</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article,  &#x3C;em&#x3E;Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column discussing NOW-NY  letter omitted Clinton campaign&#x27;s reported disavowal of  letter  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801310005</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article  and a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Boston Globe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column both discussed a  statement from the New York chapter of the National Organization for Women that  criticized Sen. Edward M. Kennedy for endorsing Sen. Barack Obama and not Sen. Hillary Rodham  Clinton for president,  but both omitted the Clinton campaign&#x27;s reported disavowal of  NOW New York&#x27;s statement. In a New York &#x3C;em&#x3E;Daily News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Bill Hammond reported that &#x22;her [Clinton&#x27;s] campaign quickly disavowed [NOW New York president  Marcia] Pappas&#x27; attack on Kennedy. &#x27;This statement does not at all reflect her  views or the opinion of the Clinton campaign,&#x27; spokesman Howard Wolfson  said.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801310005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:03:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lambro used months-old polling data to claim &#x22;parity&#x22; in congressional ethics scandals</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605260013</link>
<description>In his &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Donald Lambro repeated the oft-debunked claim that Democrats received money from Jack Abramoff and used months-old polling data to claim that a &#x22;plurality&#x22; of Americans view congressional ethics scandals as affecting both Democrats and Republicans equally. In fact, more recent polling indicates that the public views ethics scandals as more of a Republican problem than a bipartisan issue.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605260013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 16:58:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lambro falsely claimed N.J. Senate candidates are &#x22;running even&#x22; in the polls</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605040004</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Donald Lambro claimed that New Jersey state Sen. Thomas H. Kean Jr., a Republican, &#x22;is running even&#x22; with Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) in the 2006 New Jersey senatorial race. In fact, the most recent polling shows that Menendez is six points ahead of Kean.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605040004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 May 2006 12:19:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lambro&#x27;s two-week Iraq flip-flop: From &#x22;they deserve our continued military support&#x22; to &#x22;our patience is coming to an end&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604060007</link>
<description>Over the span of two weeks, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; chief political correspondent Donald Lambro has apparently reversed his support of continued U.S. military action in Iraq, without acknowledging that he has done so.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604060007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Apr 2006 18:42:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lambro misrepresented polling data to attack Democrats -- again</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603300015</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; chief political correspondent Donald Lambro claimed that pollsters &#x22;are seeing deep dissatisfaction across the country at just about every level of government,&#x22; and that &#x22;[w]hile neither party can take solace in the [poll] numbers, there may be some perverse comfort for Republicans in the fact that many of the Democrats&#x27; biggest gubernatorial stars have run into political trouble.&#x22; To support his claim, Lambro cited polls conducted by Republican-linked polling groups without identifying them as such.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603300015</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:08:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;LA Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; selectively reprinted -- and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Lambro selectively cited -- flawed AP article on Abramoff</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602170001</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reprinted an abridged version of a flawed Associated Press story about links between disgraced former lobbyist Jack Abramoff and Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Donald Lambro also selectively cited the article in a column.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602170001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 12:08:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lambro revisited familiar domestic surveillance falsehoods</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601260007</link>
<description>In his &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Donald Lambro repeated a number of falsehoods about the domestic spying scandal.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601260007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:16:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lambro cited old GOP poll to claim N.J. Republican leads &#x27;06 Senate race</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601060005</link>
<description>Donald Lambro misleadingly cited an old poll conducted by the National Republican Senatorial Committee to claim that &#x22;polls show&#x22; Republican Thomas H. Kean Jr. leads Democrat Robert Menendez by 13 points in the 2006 New Jersey senatorial race. In fact, more recent independent polls show Menendez with a lead.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601060005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:12:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>