<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Ed Henry</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/ed_henry</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Ed Henry</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>CNN, Fox News falsely suggested Senate report finding Bush administration &#x22;misled Americans&#x22; about Iraq-Al Qaeda link was approved only by Dems  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060002</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Carol Costello and Ed Henry, and Fox News&#x27; Brit Hume falsely suggested that only the Democratic members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence approved the committee&#x27;s June 5 &#x22;Report on Whether Public Statements Regarding Iraq by U.S. Government Officials Were Substantiated by Intelligence Information.&#x22; In addition to the committee&#x27;s Democrats, Republican Sens. Chuck Hagel and Olympia Snowe endorsed the report and stated that it &#x22;accomplished its primary objective.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 13:47:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN still promoting the notion that progressives don&#x27;t vote their values and aren&#x27;t &#x22;pro-family&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180008</link>
<description>Ed Henry and Jessica Yellin joined the growing list of CNN anchors and reporters who have embraced the lexicon of social conservatives, characterizing Christian conservative voters as &#x22;values voters&#x22; and equating an opposition to abortion rights with &#x22;family values.&#x22; Henry suggested that support for reproductive choice is not a &#x22;family value&#x22; and that being pro-choice is inconsistent with being &#x22;pro-family,&#x22; while Yellin suggested that those who are not &#x22;white evangelical voters&#x22; vote on something other than values.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804180008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 19:12:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Henry cited Bush&#x27;s &#x22;tout[ing]&#x22; of Iraq troop withdrawals -- but Henry  had reported troops &#x22;would have to come home ... anyway&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802040002</link>
<description>Reporting on a speech by President Bush, CNN&#x27;s Ed Henry asserted: &#x22;The president touted the fact that more than 20,000 U.S. troops will be coming home from Iraq by July.&#x22; However, Henry made no mention of his reporting for CNN in September 2007, when he noted Bush&#x27;s attempt to &#x22;get some political credit for bringing these troops home&#x22; and said: &#x22;[I]t&#x27;s important to stress, as you know, that military officials have already suggested that they&#x27;re stretched and these surge troops would have to come home by next spring -- next summer anyway.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802040002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:30:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Henry reported that Murtha said &#x22;surge is working,&#x22; ignored his continued call for Iraq withdrawal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712040002</link>
<description>On CNN,

Ed Henry reported that &#x22;Democrats ... like Congressman John Murtha ... are now saying that

the surge is working,&#x22; and suggested that, as a result of such comments,

it &#x22;is going to be more and more difficult for Democrats&#x22; to argue

that President Bush should sign a war funding bill that includes a provision

for troop redeployment.

But Murtha, who voted in favor of the bill, actually said, &#x22;I think the

surge is working, I think -- but that&#x27;s only one element. ... [T]he

thing that has to happen, the Iraqis have to do this themselves.&#x22; In a subsequent statement, Murtha

added: &#x22;The

fact remains that the war in Iraq

cannot be won militarily, and that we must begin an orderly redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq as soon as practicable.&#x22;



&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712040002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:55:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Henry  uncritically reported Republicans&#x27; use of wildfire response to shift Katrina  blame away from feds</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710290002</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Ed Henry uncritically reported that &#x22;local Republicans hammered the point 
that, unlike in Louisiana, California officials only 
relied on the feds for the secondary help,&#x22; quoting Republican Rep. Brian 
Bilbray as saying, &#x22;I think that&#x27;s how the system&#x27;s actually designed, and it&#x27;s 
worked great.&#x22; But the House Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the 
Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina found that Katrina was not a 
&#x22;normal&#x22; disaster, but a &#x22;catastrophic&#x22; one; thus, federal officials should have 
&#x22;clearly and forcefully instruct[ed] everyone involved with the federal response 
to be proactive, anticipate future requirements, develop plans to fulfill them, 
and execute those plans without waiting for formal requests from overwhelmed 
state and local response officials.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710290002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:12:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Henry reported that Bush &#x22;wants to expand&#x22; SCHIP, but not that his proposal would underfund program</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:32:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Henry uncritically aired Bush&#x27;s claim that &#x22;violence has sharply decreased in  Baghdad&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290011</link>
<description>In airing President Bush&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;[s]ectarian violence has 
sharply decreased in Baghdad. The momentum is now on our side,&#x22; CNN&#x27;s Ed Henry gave 
no indication that he attempted to verify Bush&#x27;s assertion. By contrast, recent articles by the 
Associated Press and McClatchy Newspapers have challenged claims about decreases 
in violence in Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708290011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:29:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media echoed, uncritically repeated Snow&#x27;s equating of Libby commutation with Clinton pardons</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707090003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707090003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2007 18:09:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Henry asserted that &#x22;the subpoena issue&#x22; is &#x22;about the Democrats&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707020006</link>
<description>While reporting on the split between President Bush
and his own party on the issues of immigration reform and the Iraq war,
CNN&#x27;s Ed Henry contrasted those disputes with &#x22;the subpoena
issue,&#x22; saying that the subpoenas issued by the Senate Judiciary
Committee to the White House for information on the warrantless wiretapping
program is &#x22;not really about ... [Bush&#x27;s] own party,&#x22;
it&#x27;s &#x22;about the Democrats.&#x22; In fact, several committee
Republicans voted in favor of the subpoenas.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707020006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:48:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN aired Bush assertion about Iraq three times in one hour without assessing its validity</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705240005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705240005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 15:13:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Myths and Falsehoods: Congressional war spending bills</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704170010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704170010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:07:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Henry reported that generals turned down war czar position, ignored reasons why</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:31:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media characterize expected standoff on Iraq funding as Congress &#x22;defiant&#x22; of Bush, not vice versa</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703300006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703300006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:45:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kurtz on U.S. attorneys scandal: &#x22;[A]re the media openly siding with the Democrats?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703260004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703260004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:17:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Numerous media outlets ignored Grassley &#x22;aye&#x22; vote for subpoena of White House staff</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703230010</link>
<description>Several media outlets reporting on the Senate
Judiciary Committee&#x27;s vote to authorize subpoenas of senior White House officials to force on-the-record testimony
in the U.S.
attorney investigation suggested that the vote fell along partisan lines. In
fact, Sen. Charles Grassley, a Republican, went on record with an &#x22;aye&#x22;
vote in favor of subpoenas.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703230010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 17:51:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>