<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Electoral Reform</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/electoral_reform</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Electoral Reform</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x22;[K]ey  bit of context&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Sac. Bee&#x3C;/em&#x3E; public  editor accused &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; of  omitting was in original item -- in bold</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712100002</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Sacramento Bee&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s public 
editor claimed that &#x22;there&#x27;s a key bit of context missing&#x22; from a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; item about a&#x3C;em&#x3E; Bee &#x3C;/em&#x3E;article reporting on the 
controversial Republican-backed California ballot initiative that would award 
the state&#x27;s electoral votes by congressional district. But the sentence that the 
public editor suggested was missing from the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; item was in fact included -- 
in boldface for emphasis -- in the item.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712100002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:36:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Sacramento  Bee&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  uncritically reported GOP&#x27;s claims about effects of CA ballot  initiative</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712050004</link>
<description>In reporting on a Republican-backed California 
ballot initiative that would award the state&#x27;s electoral votes by congressional 
district,&#x3C;em&#x3E; The&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Sacramento Bee&#x3C;/em&#x3E; stated that &#x22;Republicans 
behind the initiative said it would force presidential candidates to visit 
California 
more often and give more voters a voice in the presidential outcome.&#x22; But the 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Bee&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not note that there are 
only three congressional districts in California that Sen. John Kerry or 
President Bush carried by 5 percentage points or less during the 2004 
presidential election; thus, if the initiative passed, campaigns would 
presumably have little incentive to &#x22;visit California more often,&#x22; as the 
initiative&#x27;s backers reportedly claimed. Moreover, 
California 
voters would have less influence on the outcome of elections, because voters 
would likely deliver fewer than the current 55 electoral votes to the 
winner.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712050004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:12:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;LA  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  article on CA ballot initiative omitted arguments against, ignored GOP  affiliation of initiative&#x27;s backers</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712030004</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported 
that supporters of a controversial Republican-backed California ballot initiative that would award the state&#x27;s 
electoral votes by congressional district portray the proposal &#x22;as a way to make 
California&#x27;s 
elections fair.&#x22; But the article did not mention opponents&#x27; argument that the 
measure would not &#x22;make California&#x27;s elections fair.&#x22; Further, the article 
did not note that several of the key initiative supporters it named are 
prominent Republicans, or that the initiative was endorsed by the party&#x27;s state 
convention.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712030004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:51:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NPR  aired without challenging GOP misrepresentation of CA electoral college  initiative&#x27;s effect</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711260002</link>
<description>Reporting on a Republican-backed California ballot initiative that would award 
the state&#x27;s electoral votes by congressional district, NPR correspondent Ina 
Jaffe aired an audio clip of Republican consultant Dave Gilliard, who asserted: 
&#x22;We want [presidential candidates] to come out here and actually campaign 
throughout California. We want them to go to the Central Valley, and Inland 
Empire, and the North Coast, and talk to Californians about what&#x27;s important 
to California.&#x22; In fact, California has only 
three congressional districts that Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) or President Bush 
carried by 5 percentage points or less during the 2004 election, and thus, if 
the initiative passed, campaigns would presumably have little incentive &#x22;to come 
out here and actually campaign.&#x22; Further, Jaffe&#x27;s report did not note one of the 
major arguments made in opposition to the California initiative -- that it reapportions the 
electoral votes of only California, rather than applying a nationwide 
standard for the distribution of electoral votes.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711260002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:32:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Reporting on  $175K donation, &#x3C;em&#x3E;LA Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not  mention that GOP is behind CA electoral-vote  initiative</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709260008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709260008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:36:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s  Keilar reported that &#x22;the Senate voted to stop debate&#x22; on DC voting rights bill  -- but it was the Republicans</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709190007</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Brianna Keilar reported, &#x22;Today the Senate voted to stop debate on a bill 
that would have given Washington, D.C., residents their first ever 
representative in the U.S. House.&#x22; But Keilar did not note 
that it was 41 Republicans 
and one Democrat who voted to block the bill, denying proponents the 60-vote 
supermajority needed to end their filibuster.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709190007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:38:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California  Fox affiliate  misrepresented GOP&#x27;s  electoral-vote  measure</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709130009</link>
<description>On KTTV,
Fox&#x27;s Los Angeles affiliate, correspondent
John Schwada reported that &#x22;there are several new plans to further boost
the power of California
voters,&#x22; referring to separate Republican and Democratic ballot
initiatives that would change the way the state&#x27;s electoral votes are
awarded. But Schwada did not explain how the Republican initiative to award votes by congressional district would
&#x22;boost the power of California
voters.&#x22; Under the state&#x27;s current winner-take-all system, California currently awards 55 electoral votes to its
winner, far more than any other state. Under
the GOP plan, the state would give far fewer electoral votes to its winner. This, by definition, reduces the power of California voters.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709130009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:37:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Estrich  misrepresented California Democratic electoral vote  initiatives</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709100004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709100004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:17:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP reported  California GOP  &#x22;endorsed&#x22; Electoral College measure, but not that top GOP lawyer  initiated it</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709100001</link>
<description>An Associated Press article on the California Republican Party state convention 
reported that &#x22;Republicans at the convention also endorsed a proposed ballot 
initiative to change the way the state awards electoral votes in presidential 
contests,&#x22; but did not note that the initiative was originally proposed by a 
lawyer with deep ties to the state GOP or report any Democratic criticism of the 
proposed initiative.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709100001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:52:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x22;Media Matters&#x22;; by Jamison Foser&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708250001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708250001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:28:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Vogel misrepresented Democrats&#x27; CA ballot measures as &#x22;protect[ing] the current process&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240004</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special
Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, correspondent Anita Vogel falsely claimed that ballot
initiatives proposed by Democrats on the
distribution of California&#x27;s
electoral votes would &#x22;protect the current process.&#x22; In fact, the initiatives would change the
&#x22;current process&#x22; if enacted by California and other states.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708240004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:30:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox News, &#x22;pro-reform&#x22; means favoring CA Republicans&#x27; electoral initiative, not Democrats&#x27;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230011</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
correspondent Anita
Vogel reported on a
ballot initiative proposed by a
Republican organization that would &#x22;divvy up&#x22; California&#x27;s &#x22;55 coveted
electoral votes to the winner of each congressional district, rather than the
winner-take-all system currently in place.&#x22; On-screen text during
Vogel&#x27;s report identified a spokesman for the GOP group as
&#x22;pro-reform&#x22; and an
opponent of the initiative as &#x22;anti-reform.&#x22; However, the spokesman has criticized two other initiatives on California&#x27;s
electoral vote that have been proposed by Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:40:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>