<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Ethics</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/ethics</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Ethics</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Sun-Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported McCain&#x27;s criticism of &#x22;land swaps&#x22; that benefit &#x22;wealthy developers,&#x22; but not that he&#x27;s reportedly facilitated them  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090007</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chicago Sun-Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that Sen. John McCain spoke out against &#x22;land swaps, worthless land for valuable land&#x22; in connection with the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Olympics and that &#x22;McCain is still a watchdog when it comes to federal spending, but he is a supporter of Chicago&#x27;s bid for the 2016 Olympics, said his spokesman, Tucker Bounds.&#x22; But the article did not note that McCain has himself reportedly facilitated land-swap deals that benefited wealthy developers who were major McCain donors.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:40:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russert: &#x22;[T]he story about Senator McCain and lobbyists and ethics and money -- that continues&#x22; -- but not on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805230005</link>
<description>On February 24, Tim Russert stated on NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that &#x22;the story about Senator [John] McCain and lobbyists and ethics and money -- that continues. It&#x27;s been on the front page of several papers for the last three days. ... We have not heard the end of that discussion about Senator McCain.&#x22; However, since that date, &#x22;the story&#x22; has not &#x22;continue[d]&#x22; on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805230005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:17:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews: Spitzer allegations raise questions about &#x22;the judiciousness of these superdelegates&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803110003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Chris Matthews repeatedly referenced allegations that New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer was linked to a prostitution ring to call into question the role of superdelegates in the Democratic nominating process. Matthews stated: &#x22;I have to bring into question the prudence, the justice, the judiciousness of these superdelegates.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803110003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:32:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Brooks suggested McCain &#x22;only wrote two letters&#x22; as Commerce chairman  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802240003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, discussing the &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article about Sen. John McCain&#x27;s relationship with a lobbyist, David Brooks said he &#x22;do[esn&#x27;t] really understand the case&#x22; involving McCain and the letters he wrote to the Federal Communications Commission about an issue involving Paxson Communications, then suggested that McCain &#x22;only wrote two letters&#x22; as chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee. But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reported that McCain sent a series of letters to the FCC in a separate case, including &#x22;an unusually blunt letter to the head of the Federal Communications Commission, warning that he would try to overhaul the agency if it closed a broadcast ownership loophole.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802240003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:31:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NBC falsely suggested House Democrats refused to extend expiring FISA amendments  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802150012</link>
<description>NBC &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightly News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; anchor Brian Williams stated that the Republicans &#x22;left the House chamber to protest the Democrats&#x27; refusal to renew the foreign intelligence surveillance law, which expires this week.&#x22; In fact, the House voted on a measure to extend the law in question, the Protect America Act, for another 21 days, but all 195 Republicans who voted on the matter voted against it. Moreover, the &#x22;foreign intelligence surveillance law&#x22; doesn&#x27;t expire this week; the Protect America Act, giving the president broad authority to intercept communications involving people in the U.S. without a warrant, expires. Even without its renewal, the government has the authority to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802150012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:14:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Klein falsely asserted Clinton &#x22;had to return&#x22; $850,000 in contributions &#x22;to the skeevy Norman Hsu&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709230001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709230001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:55:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; again suggested  without evidence that Hsu illegally funneled donations to  Dems</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709060012</link>
<description>For the second time in a week, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; 
asserted in an article 
that &#x22;[f]ugitive businessman Norman 
Hsu ... donated more 
than $1 million to senior Democrats&#x22; and that &#x22;some of his donations were made 
through several people.&#x22; However, Hsu 
himself has donated only &#x22;$260,000 to Democratic Party groups and 
federal candidates since 2004,&#x22; 
as the article itself later noted, and the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article that first 
suggested Hsu had orchestrated illegal campaign contributions provided no 
evidence that he had actually done so.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709060012</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Sep 2007 19:26:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck  falsely claimed William Paw gave Clinton &#x22;$200,000 in  donations&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709060011</link>
<description>Glenn Beck -- apparently referring to Democratic donor William Paw -- falsely 
stated that Paw, who Beck said 
had an income of 
$46,000, sent Clinton &#x22;I think $200,000 
in donations.&#x22; In fact, according to the Federal Election Commission&#x27;s donor 
database, William Paw himself donated $4,200 to Hillary Clinton&#x27;s campaign and 
$11,800 to all Democratic candidates beginning in October 2005, while, according 
to the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, the 
seven members of the Paw family &#x22;gave $213,000, including $55,000 to Clinton and 
$14,000 to candidates for state-level offices in New York.&#x22; Beck&#x27;s guest, 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;American Spectator&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s R. Emmett 
Tyrrell Jr., stated that Norman Hsu, a businessman and Clinton 
&#x22;bundler,&#x22; is one of several 
&#x22;shadowy Asian figures&#x22; who have been involved with campaign finance violations 
associated with the Clintons.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709060011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Sep 2007 18:55:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Solomon blamed  editor for deletion about GOP  fundraiser</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709060001</link>
<description>During a washingtonpost.com discussion, when John Solomon was asked why a recent 
article he co-wrote on fundraisers did not mention Alan B. Fabian -- Mitt Romney&#x27;s 
recently indicted former national finance co-chairman -- he did not mention 
Fabian but claimed that the article included a passage on Robert Lichfield, 
another Romney fundraiser facing several lawsuits, but that &#x22;it was edited 
out,&#x22; adding that this &#x22;sometimes happens ... to make 
room for late-breaking news.&#x22; 

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709060001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:12:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  editorial criticizing &#x22;bundlers&#x22; didn&#x27;t mention Fabian</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050010</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial 
criticizing presidential candidates&#x27; use of &#x22;bundlers&#x22; stated that &#x22;Senator 
Hillary Clinton [D-NY] has been burned twice lately by so-called bundlers,&#x22; and 
made apparent references to Clinton bundlers Norman Hsu and Sant Chatwal. 
The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;went on to note that 
&#x22;[o]ther candidates in both parties have been similarly embarrassed&#x22; but offered 
no further details and made no mention of Alan B. Fabian, a Maryland bundler for 
former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney&#x27;s campaign who was indicted last month on 
fraud and money laundering charges.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:59:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.  Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  editorial noted Edwards donor&#x27;s indictment, ignored report that  Edwards  was absolved of wrongdoing</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050001</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial 
arguing for legally mandated full disclosure of campaign donation &#x22;bundlers&#x22; 
left out key facts about the two cases that it cited, Geoffrey Fieger and Norman 
Hsu. The editorial did not note 
that prosecutors have 
reportedly 
confirmed that John 
Edwards&#x27; 
campaign was unaware of 
alleged illegal contributions made by Fieger and absolved the campaign 
of any wrongdoing; similarly, the 
editorial failed to note that the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article it cited 
offered no evidence 
implicating Hillary Clinton with 
regard to Hsu.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:17:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, DeLay falsely claimed GOP &#x22;demanded that [Foley] resign from Congress&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708310007</link>
<description>Discussing whether Sen. Larry Craig will resign
following his guilty plea for misdemeanor disorderly conduct, Tom DeLay falsely
claimed that Mark Foley &#x22;resigned from Congress because the Republicans
demanded that he resign from Congress,&#x22; when sexually explicit Internet
messages he had sent to former congressional pages became public. In fact,
Dennis Hastert stated in October 2006 that &#x22;Foley resigned almost
immediately upon the outbreak of this information, and so we really didn&#x27;t have
a chance to ask him to resign.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708310007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:04:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buchanan repeated discredited claim that Rep. Frank &#x22;had a fellow running ... basically a full-service whorehouse in his basement&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708300008</link>
<description>On MSNBC, Pat Buchanan asserted that Rep. Barney Frank &#x22;had a fellow running a -- basically a full-service whorehouse in his basement.&#x22; In fact, the House ethics committee found that the man&#x27;s initial public assertions that he had run a prostitution ring out of Frank&#x27;s residence were contradicted by evidence and the sworn testimony of third parties.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708300008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:54:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News gave slim coverage to Sen. Craig  story</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280015</link>
<description>From 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. ET on August 27, Fox News devoted only 3 minutes and 
47 seconds to segments discussing Sen. Larry Craig&#x27;s lewd-conduct arrest. By contrast, MSNBC aired 8 minutes and 26 
seconds of coverage on the story, while CNN aired 20 minutes and 38 
seconds.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280015</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:54:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, networks  ignored Sen. Craig&#x27;s record on gay and lesbian issues</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280013</link>
<description>In reporting on Sen. Larry Craig&#x27;s guilty plea on disorderly conduct charges, the 
nightly network news broadcasts and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New 
York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; all ignored Craig&#x27;s positions on legislation concerning gay and 
lesbian rights, including voting against legislation to ban employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280013</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:35:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>