<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Factcheck.org</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/factcheck_org</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Factcheck.org</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>UPDATED: CBSNews.com, MSNBC.com, FactCheck.org falsely claim McCain never voted against troop funding bill</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810030010</link>
<description>In reports on the vice presidential debate, CBSNews.com, MSNBC.com, and FactCheck.org all falsely claimed that Sen. Joe Biden&#x27;s statement that Sen. John McCain &#x22;voted against funding the troops&#x22; in a 2007 appropriations bill was wrong. In fact, while McCain did not vote on a later version of the appropriations bill, he voted against the measure on March 29, 2007, and said at the time that he was opposing it, in part, because it &#x22;would establish a timeline&#x22; for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810030010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:01:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring change after Kerry rating, FactCheck.org claimed &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal &#x3C;/em&#x3E;has used same &#x22;rigorous process ... since 1981&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140013</link>
<description>In an &#x22;analysis&#x22; of Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s response to a question about being rated the &#x22;most liberal senator&#x22; of 2007 by &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, FactCheck.org deputy director Viveca Novak claimed that &#x22;[t]he nonpartisan public policy magazine&#x27;s analysis of the votes and the designation of &#x27;liberal&#x27; and &#x27;conservative&#x27; positions was done according to a rather rigorous process the publication has been using since 1981.&#x22; In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editor Charles Green has admitted that the publication changed the methodology it had used in its 2003 ratings after it determined that the methodology that resulted in a &#x22;most liberal&#x22; senator ranking for 2004 Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry had been flawed.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140013</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:13:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Still criticizing Vote Vets ad, FactCheck.org&#x27;s Jackson falsely claimed, &#x22;There has never been a vote on body armour&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610300009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610300009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:19:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;AZ Republic&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, FactCheck.org lobbed misleading claims in attempt to debunk Vote Vets ad criticizing Allen</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609220002</link>
<description>In defending Sen. George Allen against a new television advertisement criticizing his 2003 vote on a Democratic amendment that would have increased National Guard funding for body armor, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Arizona Republic&#x3C;/em&#x3E; falsely suggested -- and the website FactCheck.org falsely asserted -- that Allen and his Republican colleagues have never voted against supplemental funding for body armor.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609220002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 20:26:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>