<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Feminism</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/feminism</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Feminism</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>      Despite paper&#x27;s concern &#x22;about keeping women as newspaper readers,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; published essay calling women &#x22;kind of dim&#x22; and &#x22;the stupid sex&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803020002</link>
<description>Though &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;ombudsman Deborah Howell has stated that &#x22;[c]oncern about keeping women as newspaper readers has been an issue for many years&#x22; at the newspaper, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; published an essay by Charlotte Allen in which she called women &#x22;kind of dim,&#x22; suggested that women were not only &#x22;the weaker sex&#x22; but &#x22;the stupid sex, our brains permanently occluded by random emotions, psychosomatic flailings and distraction by the superficial,&#x22; and claimed that Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s presidential campaign has been &#x22;marred by every stereotypical flaw of the female sex.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803020002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:46:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Smerconish: &#x22;It almost seems like&#x22; VA Tech shooter &#x22;wasn&#x27;t hooking up enough&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704230006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704230006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:56:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Savage breaks vow, refers to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703070013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703070013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:28:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservative columnist and radio host Giles slurred &#x22;lesbian[]&#x22; feminists, praised &#x22;lassies&#x22; who &#x22;[d]on&#x27;t want their vagina turned into a sexual turnstile&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604250009</link>
<description>Conservative radio host and columnist Doug Giles slurred feminists as &#x22;misogynists with vaginas&#x22; and praised &#x22;lassies&#x22; who &#x22;[d]on&#x27;t want their vagina turned into a sexual turnstile.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604250009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:39:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly on co-host Lis Wiehl: &#x22;Every time I want&#x22; to &#x22;denigrate&#x22; someone, &#x22;I just go over to her and whack her around&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603170012</link>
<description>Discussing his interview with author Norman Mailer, Fox News host Bill O&#x27;Reilly told a caller to his radio show that instead of denigrating Mailer, O&#x27;Reilly could &#x22;just go over to&#x22; co-host Lis Wiehl &#x22;and whack her around.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603170012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:53:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh on what women want: to be &#x22;hired as eye candy&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601130002</link>
<description>On his radio program, Rush Limbaugh asked the women in his audience: &#x22;How many of you in the secrecy and privacy of your own dreams and hopes would love to be hired as eye candy?&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601130002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:19:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Repeating &#x22;feminazi&#x22; comment, Limbaugh reprises familiar theme</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601060006</link>
<description>Rush Limbaugh referred to the participants of a recent press conference held by women&#x27;s groups opposing the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. as &#x22;feminazis&#x22; -- a term he has repeated numerous times in previous broadcasts.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601060006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:48:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Radio host Smerconish: Educating women means &#x22;they&#x27;re not going to be around to instill these lessons in their kids&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200511290014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200511290014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:24:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh credited &#x22;militant feminazis&#x22; for alleged lack of majority support for abortion rights</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200509010003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200509010003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:46:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The &#x22;Truth&#x22; according to Limbaugh: Feminism established &#x22;to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200508160001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200508160001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:15:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh on abortion rights activists: the &#x22;original feminazis&#x22; who believe every abortion that doesn&#x27;t happen &#x22;is a setback for the cause&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200508100005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200508100005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:13:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh defended his use of term &#x22;feminazi&#x22; as &#x22;right&#x22; and &#x22;accurate&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200506240002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200506240002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:40:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tucker Carlson: &#x22;grouchy feminists with mustaches&#x22; control the Democratic Party</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200411230009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200411230009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:42:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Can you say &#x22;hypocrite&#x22;? Limbaugh lectured Rather on &#x22;sexist comment&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200409170006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200409170006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:07:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh&#x27;s &#x22;pet name&#x22; for NOW: &#x22;NAGs&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200406160004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200406160004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 12:16:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>