<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - FOX Broadcasting Company</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/fox_broadcasting_company</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: FOX Broadcasting Company</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Liasson falsely claimed that study concluded Obama&#x27;s tax plans &#x22;might add more to the deficit&#x22; than McCain&#x27;s  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806150001</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mara Liasson falsely asserted that a Tax Policy Center analysis of Sens. McCain&#x27;s and Obama&#x27;s tax plans &#x22;said that Obama might add more to the deficit -- because it&#x27;s unclear how he&#x27;s going to pay for these -- than McCain would add to the deficit.&#x22; In fact, the Tax Policy Center found that Obama&#x27;s tax proposals would raise $700 billion over the next 10 years, while McCain&#x27;s tax proposals would lose $600 billion, when scored against a &#x22; &#x27;current policy&#x27; baseline,&#x22; which &#x22;assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts would be extended and the AMT [Alternative Minimum Tax] patch made permanent.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806150001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:42:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wallace let Pawlenty falsely assert Obama has &#x22;changed his views&#x22; on whether Iranian Revolutionary Guard should be designated a terrorist group  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806080003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Chris Wallace did not challenge Gov. Tim Pawlenty&#x27;s false assertion that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;is somebody who has first said that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard isn&#x27;t a terrorist group, and now he&#x27;s changed his views on that and several other foreign policy issues.&#x22; In fact, Obama has consistently supported designating the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization, having co-sponsored a bill in 2007 to do so.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806080003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:54:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>   Media asserted that McCain flew coach in 2007, without noting expenditure records showing payments for use of wife&#x27;s jet  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804280006</link>
<description>Despite the availability of expenditure reports showing that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s campaign used a corporate jet owned by his wife&#x27;s company over a seven-month period beginning in the summer of 2007, several members of the media asserted earlier this year that McCain flew coach when the campaign was low on funds.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804280006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:59:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wallace refused to acknowledge inconsistency in McCain&#x27;s statements on Iraq as South Korea, accusing Kerry of &#x22;conflating&#x22; them  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070007</link>
<description>Sen. John McCain said at a New Hampshire town hall meeting that the U.S. may have a presence in Iraq for &#x22;[m]aybe a hundred [years]. We&#x27;ve been in South Korea; we&#x27;ve been in Japan for 60 years. We&#x27;ve been in South   Korea for 50 years or so.&#x22; But McCain said in an interview four months earlier on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Charlie Rose&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that a long-term U.S. presence in Iraq, modeled after its presence in South Korea, would not work &#x22;because of the nature of the society in Iraq.&#x22; When Sen. John Kerry pointed out this inconsistency on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Chris Wallace did not acknowledge it, instead saying that he thought Kerry was &#x22;conflating two different interviews.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:49:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wallace joined other Fox hosts in falsely suggesting Dean criticized McCain for citing his military service  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804060003</link>
<description>Responding to Sen. John Kerry&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;[n]obody ever would insinuate that John McCain is anything but a hero for his activities in -- in -- ,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; host Chris Wallace interrupted him and stated: &#x22;Well, [Democratic National Committee chairman] Howard Dean called him a blatant opportunist,&#x22; falsely suggesting that Dean accused McCain of being a &#x22;blatant opportunist&#x22; because McCain has discussed his military experience.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804060003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:14:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite McCain&#x27;s moves to placate GOP base, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Wallace wondered how Dean could call McCain an &#x22;opportunist&#x22; &#x26;nbsp;  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803300002</link>
<description>Discussing Howard Dean&#x27;s assertion that Sen. John McCain is a &#x22;blatant opportunist,&#x22; on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Chris Wallace stated, &#x22;I think you can call John McCain a lot of things. Opportunist?&#x22; Bill Kristol responded that polls on the Iraq war show &#x22;that most people would like to be told, &#x27;Hey, we can get out of there soon, no problem, no damage,&#x27; &#x22; and added: &#x22;I think the opportunist line is just ludicrous.&#x22; The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chicago Tribune&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jill Zuckman asserted: &#x22;McCain actually revels in saying the thing that you don&#x27;t want to hear. And he says it first.&#x22; No member of the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday &#x3C;/em&#x3E;panel mentioned that McCain has reversed his positions on issues such as taxes, immigration, and his view of the religious right to align himself more closely with the base of his party.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803300002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:37:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Kristol claimed Hagee and Parsley are &#x22;just individuals who&#x27;ve endorsed&#x22; McCain  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803230004</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, when Bill Kristol was asked whether &#x22;it&#x27;s fair&#x22; to compare &#x22;[Sen. John] McCain&#x27;s, quote, &#x27;ministers,&#x27; &#x22; John Hagee and Rod Parsley, &#x22;to [Sen. Barack] Obama&#x27;s pastor,&#x22; Kristol replied: &#x22;No, because these are just individuals who&#x27;ve endorsed Senator McCain.&#x22; However, McCain stated in a joint appearance with Hagee that he was &#x22;very proud to have Pastor Hagee&#x27;s support&#x22; and reportedly called Parsley a &#x22;spiritual guide.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803230004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:18:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Notwithstanding Obama&#x27;s consistent support for Israel, Rove suggests that as president, Obama may withdraw funding for Israel  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030007</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, in discussing Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s statement that money being spent on the war in Iraq &#x22;is money that we could be spending here in the United States, rebuilding our infrastructure, building schools, sending kids to university,&#x22; Karl Rove quoted a &#x22;Democrat&#x22; he said he had spoken to in Los Angeles as saying, &#x22;I&#x27;m worried about that, because does that mean he&#x27;s going to be looking at our support, for example, for the state of Israel and looking at it in terms of what could we be doing at home with those dollars?&#x22; However, Obama has consistently supported aid to Israel.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:22:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Rove and Wallace failed to note Obama has answered questions about Farrakhan  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803020003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Karl Rove asserted of Sen. Barack Obama facing questions about the Nation of Islam&#x27;s Louis Farrakhan: &#x22;Now, having ties to Louis Farrakhan and his anti-Semitic comments, that&#x27;s -- that&#x27;s -- you know, people have a reason -- that&#x27;s a reasonable question: Do you agree with him? Do you renounce him? Do you reject him?&#x22; In fact, Obama has denied that his campaign has &#x22;ties to&#x22; Farrakhan and has answered the questions posed by Rove, having repeatedly denounced Farrakhan&#x27;s anti-Semitic statements.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803020003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:01:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wallace again falsely suggested PAA gave government authority to &#x22;monitor communications among terrorism suspects&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802170004</link>
<description>Introducing an interview with Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell, Chris Wallace asserted: &#x22;A law which gives President Bush powers to monitor communications among terrorism suspects expired at midnight.&#x22; In fact, the expired PAA revisions to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, did not simply give Bush &#x22;powers to monitor communications among terrorism suspects,&#x22; but rather, among other things, the revisions expanded the government&#x27;s authority to eavesdrop on Americans&#x27; domestic-to-foreign communications without a warrant. Further, Wallace never mentioned that the government had the authority to listen in on the communications of suspected terrorists before Congress passed the PAA in August 2007 or that this authority continues despite the PAA&#x27;s expiration.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802170004</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:57:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>While ignoring Bush&#x27;s inconsistent statements on the issue, Fox&#x27;s Wallace allowed Bush to distort Obama&#x27;s Pakistan remark  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110006</link>
<description>During a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; interview with President Bush, Chris Wallace left unchallenged Bush&#x27;s statement regarding Sen. Barack Obama: &#x22;I certainly don&#x27;t know what he believes in. The only foreign policy thing I remember he said was he&#x27;s going to attack Pakistan and embrace [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad.&#x22; But Bush and his administration have made contradictory statements on the question of dealing with Al Qaeda leaders in Pakistan, the specific issue that Bush purported to know where Obama stands. Wallace also did not note Bush misrepresented Obama&#x27;s statements regarding Pakistan and engaging in dialogue with Ahmadinejad.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:56:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing McCain talking point, Chris Wallace asked Clinton: &#x22;[W]hy are you so determined to declare defeat&#x22; in Iraq?  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802030003</link>
<description>While discussing the war in Iraq with Sen. Hillary Clinton on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Chris Wallace echoed Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain by asking Clinton, &#x22;[W]hy are you so determined to declare defeat?&#x22; McCain has repeatedly referred to Clinton&#x27;s and other Democrats&#x27; proposals on Iraq as &#x22;surrender.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802030003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:12:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sunday-show  discussions of Giuliani billing issue ignored that affair reportedly created  increased cost for NYC taxpayers</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712030009</link>
<description>Chris Matthews, Tim Russert, and Chris Wallace each discussed a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article that reported: &#x22;As 
New York mayor, Rudy 
Giuliani billed obscure city agencies for tens of thousands of dollars in 
security expenses amassed during the time when he was beginning an extramarital 
relationship with future wife Judith Nathan.&#x22; But, at no point during these 
segments did any of the hosts or guests note that Giuliani was having an 
extramarital affair with Nathan - whom they described merely as his girlfriend 
-- and that, because of the affair, New York City taxpayers were reportedly 
paying for both her protection and that of Giuliani&#x27;s estranged wife.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712030009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:30:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring  his  flawed  2006  forecast,  Wallace allowed Rove to predict  GOP  &#x22;gains in the Congress&#x22; in 2008</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712020001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News 
Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Karl Rove stated, &#x22;I&#x27;m confident the Republican 
candidates are going to have 
enough money to make 
enough damage out of this 
record to make gains in the Congress.&#x22; Host Chris Wallace did not note Rove&#x27;s 
incorrect prediction that Republicans would retain control of Congress in the 
2006 elections or Rove&#x27;s incorrect predictions about the 2000 presidential 
election.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712020001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Dec 2007 15:03:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Contrary to  researchers&#x27; views, Hume touted stem-cell breakthrough as &#x22;virtually eliminat[ing]&#x22;  debate</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711270002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Brit Hume and Bill Kristol 
asserted that the recent announcement 
that scientists have reprogrammed adult stem cells to apparently behave like 
embryonic stem cells would end the debate over embryonic stem cell 
research. But none of the panelists 
mentioned that several scientists, including one of the lead 
researchers, have said that the reprogramming does not end the need for 
embryonic stem-cell 
research.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711270002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:49:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>