<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - FOX News Live</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/fox_news_live</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: FOX News Live</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Shively falsely suggested Obama has been a Christian for only &#x22;two decades now&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030009</link>
<description>Fox News correspondent Caroline Shively asserted that &#x22;[Sen. Barack] Obama says &#x27;Enough already. There&#x27;s nothing wrong with being a Muslim, but I have been a Christian for two decades now.&#x27; &#x22; In fact, Obama has said that he has &#x22;always been a Christian,&#x22; and has also repeatedly stated that he has never been a Muslim or ever practiced Islam.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 19:44:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Radio host Mark Williams: &#x22;I have yet to meet anybody who likes&#x22; Sen. Clinton during his time in upstate New York  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802030008</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, radio host Mark Williams claimed, &#x22;I&#x27;ve been in upstate New  York in the Albany area for the last couple of weeks, and I have yet to meet anybody who likes&#x22; Sen. Hillary Clinton. However, two recent polls of likely New  York state Democratic primary voters show that a majority of respondents from the upstate region said they will support Clinton in the February 5 Democratic primary.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802030008</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:17:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Hill on Obama: &#x22; &#x27;I won&#x27;t wear &#x3C;em&#x3E;that&#x3C;/em&#x3E; [flag] pin&#x27; ... reminded me of the &#x27;I didn&#x27;t have sex with &#x3C;em&#x3E;that&#x3C;/em&#x3E; woman&#x27; &#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710050010</link>
<description>Responding to Barack Obama&#x27;s explanation for why he stopped wearing an American flag pin on his lapel during the lead-up to the Iraq war, because it had become &#x22;a substitute for, I think, true patriotism,&#x22; Fox News Live co-host E.D. Hill said: &#x22;When I heard this, actually, one of the direct quotes [of Obama] that got to me was &#x27;I won&#x27;t wear that pin.&#x27; It reminded me of the &#x27;I didn&#x27;t have sex with that woman.&#x27; &#x22; Fox legal analyst Andrew Napolitano then accused Obama of &#x22;disrespecting the American flag,&#x22; while his Fox News Radio co-host, Brian Kilmeade, said that Obama was &#x22;anti-Betsy Ross.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710050010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:51:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E; guest claimed Limbaugh named MacBeth &#x22;about 30 seconds&#x22; after &#x22;phony soldiers&#x22; comment -- but it was nearly 2 minutes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Live, &#x3C;/em&#x3E;after hearing a segment of Rush 
Limbaugh&#x27;s controversial comments characterizing service members who advocate 
U.S. withdrawal from Iraq as &#x22;phony soldiers,&#x22; guest Carrie Lukas of the 
Independent Women&#x27;s Forum asserted, &#x22;If you go on for another, about 30 seconds, 
you hear Mr. Limbaugh start talking about Jessie MacBeth.&#x22; In fact, a 1 minute 
and 50 second discussion occurred between Limbaugh&#x27;s original &#x22;phony soldiers&#x22; 
comment and his reference to MacBeth.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:14:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Angle repeatedly  misrepresented Limbaugh&#x27;s and &#x22;critics&#x27;&#x22; comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle 
repeatedly misrepresented both Rush 
Limbaugh&#x27;s &#x22;phony 
soldiers&#x22; comment and the arguments of &#x22;Limbaugh&#x27;s critics,&#x22; 
falsely reinforcing Limbaugh&#x27;s claim that he was referring to actual military 
imposters, rather than service members or former service members with whom he 
disagrees.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:24:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox News, &#x22;pro-reform&#x22; means favoring CA Republicans&#x27; electoral initiative, not Democrats&#x27;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230011</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
correspondent Anita
Vogel reported on a
ballot initiative proposed by a
Republican organization that would &#x22;divvy up&#x22; California&#x27;s &#x22;55 coveted
electoral votes to the winner of each congressional district, rather than the
winner-take-all system currently in place.&#x22; On-screen text during
Vogel&#x27;s report identified a spokesman for the GOP group as
&#x22;pro-reform&#x22; and an
opponent of the initiative as &#x22;anti-reform.&#x22; However, the spokesman has criticized two other initiatives on California&#x27;s
electoral vote that have been proposed by Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:40:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Hill: Plame &#x22;skirt[ed] the issue&#x22; of whether she was covert in House testimony</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703160013</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, E.D. Hill asserted that &#x22;it
sounded like&#x22; former CIA operative Valerie Plame&#x27;s testimony to a House committee was &#x22;completely skirting
the issue of whether she still fell under those rules of being considered
covert&#x22; when her identity was leaked. In fact, Plame specifically testified that she
was &#x22;covert&#x22; until Robert Novak publicly revealed her identity in a 2003
column.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703160013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:20:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Hill on Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;Southern drawl&#x22;: &#x22;[I]f she was attending, say, a GLAAD convention, would she speak with a lisp?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:01:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Fox News touted flawed GOP poll to claim &#x22;America Says Let&#x27;s Win [Iraq] War&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702220004</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and Fox News touted a poll that found that
&#x22;57 percent of Americans supported &#x27;finishing the job in Iraq&#x27; -- keeping U.S. troops there until the Iraqis
can provide security on their own.&#x22; But neither the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; nor Fox News
noted that the company that conducted the poll considers itself a
&#x22;Republican polling firm&#x22; and that poll questions apparently were,
according to the head of a different
Republican polling firm, &#x22;designed to
register certain responses.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702220004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:30:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen on Edwards controversy: Isn&#x27;t it normally &#x22;the left-wing bloggers ... going after people?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702090001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702090001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:01:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who are Sen. Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;evil men&#x22;? Media mind-readers can&#x27;t agree</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:41:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite lack of timetable, media persist in calling Bush&#x27;s troop increase a &#x22;surge&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701110013</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:56:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Only on Fox: &#x22;Are Congressional Democrats killing spirit of bipartisanship?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030016</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030016</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:54:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservatives attack Iraq Study Group report as &#x22;surrender,&#x22; &#x22;not a serious document&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612090003</link>
<description>Conservative media figures, including Bill Kristol,
Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck, have attacked both the members of the Iraq Study
Group and its report: Kristol has called the report &#x22;an evasion&#x22;
and &#x22;not a serious document&#x22;; Limbaugh asserted that ISG members
are &#x22;doing everything they can to unite the American people&#x22; in
&#x22;defeat&#x22; and &#x22;surrender&#x22;; while Beck has called the ISG
report &#x22;Operation White Flag.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612090003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:18:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Vogel falsely suggested AARP opposed California&#x27;s new driver-assessment program</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611280002</link>
<description>In a report on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox
News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, correspondent Anita Vogel falsely suggested that the AARP
opposes California&#x27;s
new driver-assessment program. In fact, while the AARP does oppose legislation that would
require additional driving tests based solely on age, AARP supports legislation
requiring driver assessments for all, such as California&#x27;s program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611280002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:29:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>