<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - FOX News Watch</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/fox_news_watch</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: FOX News Watch</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox  News Watch &#x3C;/em&#x3E;announcer teased  NIE discussion by referring to &#x22;Iran&#x27;s  nukes&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712100003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Watch&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, an announcer 
teased a discussion about coverage of the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on 
Iran by stating: &#x22;Iran&#x27;s 
nukes. The president claims a new intelligence report proves Iran 
still dangerous.&#x22; In fact, the NIE said: &#x22;We continue to assess with 
moderate-to-high confidence that Iran does not currently have a 
nuclear weapon.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712100003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:42:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pinkerton falsely claimed CNN showed photo &#x22;still&#x22; juxtaposing Falwell and Hitler</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705210003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News
Watch&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s
James Pinkerton asserted that, during its coverage of Rev. Jerry
Falwell&#x27;s death, CNN featured &#x22;a picture of Falwell and [Adolf]
Hitler together&#x22; as &#x22;kind of their idea of what he [Falwell] ought
to be.&#x22; In fact, the image appeared in archived footage of a
demonstration in which protestors held placards featuring the faces of Falwell,
Hitler, and other prominent political figures.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705210003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:56:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thomas claimed Dems held back on discussing attorney firings during &#x27;06 campaign, when most had not yet happened</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703200009</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News
Watch&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Cal Thomas asserted that questions surrounding the Bush
administration&#x27;s firing of eight U.S. attorneys &#x22;didn&#x27;t
surface in October [2006]&#x22; because &#x22;the left in the media -- but I repeat
myself -- had enough scandal going with Mark Foley and a bunch of other stuff, they
didn&#x27;t need this.&#x22; In fact, by October 2006, only one of the U.S.
attorneys had been
dismissed; the other
seven were not dismissed until December 7,
2006, a month after the November midterm elections.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703200009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:45:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sounding a familiar refrain, Pinkerton linked Walter Reed problems to Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703130009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703130009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:58:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News whitewashes evangelical hostility to Romney&#x27;s faith</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702280002</link>
<description>While other media outlets, in
their coverage of Mitt Romney&#x27;s presidential campaign, have addressed the
longtime evangelical hostility to Romney&#x27;s Mormon faith, Fox News has largely
avoided the subject and has responded to other media coverage of the issue by alleging media bias or, in the case of one guest, accusing liberals of anti-Mormon bigotry.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702280002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:50:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox, Pinkerton claimed &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Walter Reed story was &#x22;going after the administration from the right&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702270001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702270001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:06:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Timeline of a smear  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701300007</link>
<description>On January 17, InsightMag.com posted a story
stating that Sen. Barack Obama attended a madrassa as a boy and that this information
had originated from Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s camp. With the aid of
the conservative media, InsightMag.com&#x27;s anonymously sourced report
turned into 11 days
of baseless accusations against two leading contenders for the 2008 Democratic presidential
nomination.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701300007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:14:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Although &#x22;San Francisco liberal&#x22; label is much more common, Pinkerton claimed media &#x22;spin&#x22; Pelosi as &#x22;moderate grandmother ... from Baltimore&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611150008</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; Fox News Watch&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Pinkerton claimed that Nancy Pelosi
&#x22;is being presented to the American people as this moderate grandmother
... from Baltimore&#x22; rather than someone
&#x22;from San Francisco
[who] represents the left wing.&#x22; In fact, a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; survey showed that Pelosi has been portrayed
in the media as a San Francisco liberal much
more often than as a grandmother from Baltimore.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611150008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:52:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial: Democrats must confirm Bolton &#x22;to demonstrate to America&#x27;s enemies that they don&#x27;t have allies on Capitol Hill&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611140012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611140012</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:26:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Purporting to have learned from Capitol Police about House pages&#x27; &#x22;cavort[ing]&#x22; naked, Cal Thomas&#x27;s claims very similar to NewsMax report of pre-1983 conduct</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610160006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610160006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:17:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Eric Burns ignored report that Fox also had Foley emails</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090009</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Watch&#x3C;/em&#x3E; host Eric Burns stated that &#x22;the &#x3C;em&#x3E;St. Petersburg Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Miami Herald&#x3C;/em&#x3E; in Florida,&#x22; as well as ABC News, all had &#x22;known about&#x22; leaked copies of email messages allegedly sent by former Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) to a 16-year-old male former congressional page, but he ignored a report that Fox News was also a recipient of the leaked emails.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2006 19:02:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cal Thomas: &#x22;No wonder&#x22; Gabler &#x22;like[s]&#x22; Hezbollah&#x27;s offers to rebuild Lebanon, it&#x27;s &#x22;the Middle East version of the New Deal&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608210001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608210001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:41:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite blasting &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; for bank monitoring story, conservative media figures mum on unwanted media exposure of alleged NYC terror plot</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607110001</link>
<description>Many of the same media conservatives who continually attacked &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; for publishing details of the Treasury Department&#x27;s bank-tracking program have remained silent about the &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Daily News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; decision to report that FBI officials thwarted an alleged terrorist plot in New York City, despite apparent objections from intelligence and law enforcement officials that the disclosure impeded further arrests.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607110001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:32:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservatives claimed &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; alerted terrorists, ignored Bush administration&#x27;s prior promotion of its bank-tracking efforts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606280010</link>
<description>Numerous conservative commentators joined the Bush administration in arguing that, in detailing a secret Treasury Department program designed to monitor terrorists&#x27; international financial transactions, a June 23 &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article tipped off terrorists to the U.S. government&#x27;s ability to track their financial activities -- some going so far as to accuse the newspaper of treason. But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; report was hardly the first indication of U.S. efforts to monitor terrorists&#x27; financial transactions: President Bush himself repeatedly touted the government&#x27;s capability to track and shut down terrorists&#x27; international financial networks.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606280010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:48:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Pinkerton: Media &#x22;frame&#x22; Iraq coverage by portraying &#x22;the U.S. military&#x22; as &#x22;evil,&#x22; &#x22;bad people,&#x22; and &#x22;killers&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606270001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Watch&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist James P. Pinkerton asserted that &#x22;the press turned on the Iraq war several years ago&#x22; and now chooses to &#x22;frame&#x22; its coverage of the war in two ways: &#x22;One is, the U.S. military is evil&#x22; and two, &#x22;the U.S. military needs to be carefully restrained with legal rules and procedures.&#x22; Pinkerton suggested the media portray American servicemen and women as &#x22;bad people&#x22; and &#x22;killers.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606270001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:28:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>