<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Greg Jarrett</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/greg_jarrett</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Greg Jarrett</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>On Fox News, &#x22;pro-reform&#x22; means favoring CA Republicans&#x27; electoral initiative, not Democrats&#x27;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230011</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
correspondent Anita
Vogel reported on a
ballot initiative proposed by a
Republican organization that would &#x22;divvy up&#x22; California&#x27;s &#x22;55 coveted
electoral votes to the winner of each congressional district, rather than the
winner-take-all system currently in place.&#x22; On-screen text during
Vogel&#x27;s report identified a spokesman for the GOP group as
&#x22;pro-reform&#x22; and an
opponent of the initiative as &#x22;anti-reform.&#x22; However, the spokesman has criticized two other initiatives on California&#x27;s
electoral vote that have been proposed by Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708230011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:40:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Fox News touted flawed GOP poll to claim &#x22;America Says Let&#x27;s Win [Iraq] War&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702220004</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and Fox News touted a poll that found that
&#x22;57 percent of Americans supported &#x27;finishing the job in Iraq&#x27; -- keeping U.S. troops there until the Iraqis
can provide security on their own.&#x22; But neither the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; nor Fox News
noted that the company that conducted the poll considers itself a
&#x22;Republican polling firm&#x22; and that poll questions apparently were,
according to the head of a different
Republican polling firm, &#x22;designed to
register certain responses.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702220004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:30:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Only on Fox: Onscreen graphic suggests &#x22;a Lamont win&#x22; would be &#x22;bad news for democracy in Mideast,&#x22; would show Democrats have &#x22;forgotten the lessons of 9/11&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080007</link>
<description>During August 8 coverage of the Connecticut Democratic Senate primary election, Fox News host Gregg Jarrett offered a stream of Republican talking points, suggesting that a win by Ned Lamont would be a sign of Democrats &#x22;becom[ing] the sort-of modern-day George McGovern, who got really creamed politically for his anti-war stance.&#x22; Jarrett&#x27;s rhetoric was accompanied by a series of onscreen graphics that suggested a Lamont victory would be &#x22;bad news for democracy in [the] Mideast,&#x22; and would show that the Democratic Party has &#x22;forgotten the lessons of 9/11&#x22; and is &#x22;soft on terror.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608080007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:56:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media ran amok with &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Clinton marriage article</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240008</link>
<description>Following the publication of a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on the purported state of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and former President Bill Clinton&#x27;s marriage, numerous news outlets ran reports and aired discussions on the story. The 2,000-word article by &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Patrick Healy was based on the accounts of &#x22;some 50 people,&#x22; &#x22;many&#x22; of whom &#x22;were granted anonymity to discuss a relationship for which the Clintons have long sought a zone of privacy.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 15:54:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jarrett called Ohio governor&#x27;s race &#x22;now a bit of a nail-biter&#x22; -- but latest polls show Democrat far ahead</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240003</link>
<description>Introducing an interview with Democratic Ohio gubernatorial candidate Ted Strickland on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host Gregg Jarrett claimed that unnamed &#x22;experts say [Ohio] is yet again shaping up to be a key battleground state&#x22; and the race for governor of Ohio is &#x22;now a bit of a nail-biter.&#x22; But polling data tell a different story: The most recent state polling puts Strickland far ahead of his opponent, Republican J. Kenneth Blackwell.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605240003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 12:55:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>