<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Harriet Miers</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/harriet_miers</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Harriet Miers</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Fund claimed that economic -- not religious -- conservatives sank Miers nomination</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603220002</link>
<description>On CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Lou Dobbs Tonight&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN senior legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin asserted that &#x22;social, largely religious conservatives&#x22; forced the withdrawal of Harriet Miers&#x27;s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist John Fund responded to Toobin by naming two conservative religious leaders who had been Miers&#x27;s &#x22;biggest backers&#x22; and claiming, &#x22;It was economic conservatives, including &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, that were skeptical&#x22; of her nomination. In fact, following the disclosure of a speech by Miers in which she said that &#x22;self-determination&#x22; should guide decisions about abortion and school prayer, numerous social conservative groups and leaders demanded that Miers&#x27;s nomination be withdrawn.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603220002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:48:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;i&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/i&#x3E; reported that Miers withdrew &#x22;because of criticism of her credentials, not her views&#x22; -- but her views generated strong conservative opposition</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200511040013</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200511040013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:59:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Malveaux omitted conservative opposition to Miers&#x27;s views on abortion, other issues</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200511020002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200511020002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:50:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Coulter: Miers withdrawal &#x22;demonstrates that the movement conservatives&#x22; have &#x22;the power in the country,&#x22; &#x22;listening to Democrats&#x22; got Bush into trouble</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510270017</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510270017</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:48:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In reporting &#x22;positive response from conservatives&#x22; to Miers&#x27;s support for abortion ban in 1989 survey, &#x3C;i&#x3E;LA Times&#x3C;/i&#x3E; ignored lingering concerns</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510190004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510190004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:42:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;i&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/i&#x3E; uncritically reported dubious White House claim that it didn&#x27;t &#x22;organize&#x22; meeting between Miers&#x27;s friends, Christian Right group</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510180008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510180008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:26:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;i&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/i&#x3E; omitted Bush&#x27;s emphasis on Miers&#x27;s religion in reporting White House concern that topic has &#x22;continued to assert&#x22; itself</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510180007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510180007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:05:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NY Times suggested that only Democrats have accused Miers critics of sexism, criticized White House for religious focus</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510170012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510170012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 18:18:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>WaPo misinformation on Miers nomination</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510170008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510170008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:47:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;i&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/i&#x3E; and &#x3C;i&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/i&#x3E; ignored White House 180 on Supreme Court nominees&#x27; religion</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510170007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510170007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:15:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Limbaugh falsely claimed religious conservatives are united behind Miers</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510170001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510170001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:34:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media continue to ignore contradictions in Dobson&#x27;s claims about &#x22;confidential&#x22; information on Miers</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510130003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510130003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:05:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media uncritically repeated Dobson&#x27;s purported disclosure of &#x22;confidential&#x22; information</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510120004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510120004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:48:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;i&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/i&#x3E; ignored relevant evidence in presenting Miers&#x27;s &#x22;paper trail&#x22; on abortion</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510110003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510110003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:39:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In examining Miers&#x27;s tenure with Texas Lottery Commission, &#x3C;i&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/i&#x3E; left out key link to Bush campaign</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200510080003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200510080003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Oct 2005 20:09:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>