<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Homeland Security</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/homeland_security</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Homeland Security</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Krauthammer&#x27;s  claims about Bush&#x27;s &#x22;steely&#x22; resolve against Al Qaeda conflict with reported  facts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709120009</link>
<description>Among the reasons cited by Charles Krauthammer that Al Qaeda has not and 
cannot 
&#x22;hit us&#x22; is because the 
Bush administration has waged an &#x22;incredibly effective war in Afghanistan&#x22; that 
he said has &#x22;expelled Al Qaeda and scattered it, and has kept it off-balance for 
six years now.&#x22; In fact, the July 2007 National Intelligence Estimate concluded 
that Al Qaeda &#x22;has protected or regenerated key elements of its Homeland attack 
capability&#x22; including a &#x22;safehaven&#x22; in Pakistan. Krauthammer also credited 
&#x22;secret prisons and the interrogation which yielded and interrogated people like 
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed&#x22;; but even supporters of 
the CIA&#x27;s interrogation and detention program reportedly acknowledge that much 
of the information that coercion produces, including information gathered from 
Mohammed, is unreliable.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709120009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:49:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not  challenge Bush claim that terrorists &#x22;would attack us at home&#x22; if  U.S. withdraws from  Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050003</link>
<description>An article in &#x3C;em&#x3E;The&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported President Bush&#x27;s 
assertion that withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq would &#x22;embolden our enemies and 
make it more likely that they would attack us at home,&#x22; without noting expert opinion that a U.S. troop withdrawal is unlikely to result in a terrorist attack on 
the United States.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709050003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:20:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Gibson uncritically reported claim that &#x22;we dodged a bullet&#x22; by foiling terror plot on Fort Dix</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705090004</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;World
News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, while introducing a report on the foiled Fort Dix plot,
Charles Gibson uncritically repeated an FBI official&#x27;s claim that
&#x22;[t]oday, we dodged a bullet. In fact, when you look at the type of
weapons this group was trying to purchase, we may have dodged a lot of
bullets.&#x22; But neither Gibson nor ABC News&#x27; Brian Ross, in his
subsequent report, noted that no attack was alleged to be imminent and that Fort Dix
officials have reportedly claimed that the base was not, at any point, in
immediate danger.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705090004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 May 2007 15:21:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hannity falsely claimed Dem plan includes &#x22;nothing about ... increasing security in this country&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030015</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701030015</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:08:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AP depicted 9-11 Commission recommendations as either &#x22;accomplished&#x22; or unfeasible</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611280001</link>
<description>An Associated Press article
asserted that the incoming Democratic Congress will face an uphill battle in
its drive to implement all of the 9-11 Commission&#x27;s recommendations
because &#x22;[m]uch of what the commission proposed has been
accomplished&#x22; and &#x22;there are no still-lingering proposals that can
easily be enacted into law.&#x22; But there are several
&#x22;still-lingering&#x22; recommendations that members of the commission --
none of whom were quoted in the article -- say could be implemented by the
Democratic Congress.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611280001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:24:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cables devoted big coverage to bogus NFL threat, did not mention evidence of political motivation for prior threat announcements</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610190010</link>
<description>CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC dedicated a considerable amount of airtime to a purported threat to NFL stadiums in seven cities, despite the fact that the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI both characterized the threat as not credible. Further, with one brief exception, at no point was there any reference on any of the three channels to evidence that the Bush administration has used terrorism-related announcements for political gain.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610190010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:30:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News guest Simmons claimed stadium terror hoax is &#x22;the perfect example&#x22; of &#x22;how vital&#x22; the detainee bill and warrantless domestic spying program are</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610190009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610190009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:28:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial claimed military met recruitment goals because &#x22;troops believe in mission,&#x22; ignored lower aptitude requirements for new soldiers</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610120006</link>
<description>A &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial asserted that the Army&#x27;s achievement of exceeding its goal of recruiting or retaining 80,000 troops for fiscal 2006 demonstrates that &#x22;many troops believe in the mission.&#x22; But the editorial omitted the fact that the Army exceeded its goal by &#x22;recruit[ing] more than 2,600 soldiers under new lower aptitude standards this year,&#x22; according to an AP report.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610120006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:32:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On MSNBC, author Barrett responded to O&#x27;Donnell&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;you can&#x27;t honestly say&#x22; Giuliani &#x22;could have predicted that&#x22; the World  Trade Center &#x22;would have been attacked?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609010010</link>
<description>Discussing former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s performance before, during, and after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks with author Wayne Barrett, Norah O&#x27;Donnell asked Barrett: &#x22;[Y]ou can&#x27;t honestly say he [Giuliani] could have predicted that that area [the World Trade  Center complex] would have been attacked?&#x22; In response, Barrett pointed out that the World Trade  Center complex &#x22;was at the top of the vulnerability list that [Giuliani&#x27;s] own police department prepared.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609010010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Sep 2006 18:58:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Colmes challenged Morris as he repeated wiretapping and Patriot Act falsehoods</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608310011</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; Alan Colmes repeatedly challenged Fox News political analyst Dick Morris&#x27;s false claims that &#x22;Democrats oppose&#x22; &#x22;the Patriot Act, the NSA wiretaps, the seizure of bank deposits, [and] data mining.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608310011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:57:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on Katrina&#x27;s political effect quoted only Republicans, obscured Democratic criticism of Bush&#x27;s recovery efforts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608280006</link>
<description>In an August 26 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article exploring the political effects of Hurricane Katrina on the Bush administration, Jonathan Weisman and Michael Abramowitz uncritically reported the GOP claim that public opinion of Bush&#x27;s handling of the crisis has rebounded over the past year, ignoring recent polling showing otherwise. Further, they repeated the White House assertion that Bush now has a &#x22;strong story to tell&#x22; about his recovery efforts along the Gulf Coast but failed to quote a single Democrat in response.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608280006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:20:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Quijano uncritically reported dubious Bush statement suggesting link between U.K. terror plot, warrantless wiretaps</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608210008</link>
<description>CNN correspondent Elaine Quijano uncritically reported a dubious statement by President Bush suggesting a link between a recent terror plot in Britain and the administration&#x27;s warrantless domestic surveillance program. And host Wolf Blitzer did not identify the program as warrantless, although it is the administration&#x27;s failure to obtain warrants to conduct surveillance on U.S. persons that is the issue in controversy and the reason a judge struck down the program.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608210008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:51:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews again mischaracterized warrantless-wiretapping debate, this time in discussion with Liddy, his &#x22;go-to guy for wiretapping&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180012</link>
<description>On MSNBC&#x27;s Hardball, Chris Matthews again falsely suggested that critics of the Bush administration&#x27;s warrantless domestic surveillance program are opposed to all wiretapping of terrorist suspects. In fact, critics have accused the Bush administration of violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by conducting surveillance of U.S. citizens and legal residents without obtaining a warrant.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:59:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly: &#x22;Fund[ing] first responders ... means after you&#x27;re dead, [they&#x27;ll] have enough ambulances to carry your corpse to the funeral home&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180006</link>
<description>On his radio show, Bill O&#x27;Reilly mocked Rep. Dennis Kucinich&#x27;s proposal to increase funding for first responders, stating of Kucinich&#x27;s four-point plan to increase national security: &#x22;Number three: Fund first responders in the U.S.A. That means after you&#x27;re dead, have enough ambulances to carry your corpse to the funeral home.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:44:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>After two reports of massive security lapses in two months, will the media begin to question Bush&#x27;s national security record?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070003</link>
<description>Now that it has been reported twice in the past two months that lapses in security placed the personal information of millions of veterans and the integrity of the FBI&#x27;s computer system in jeopardy, will the media finally begin to question the national security credentials of the Bush White House and Republicans?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607070003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jul 2006 10:59:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>