<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Howard Fineman</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/howard_fineman</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Howard Fineman</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Fineman called Clinton&#x27;s comments on Obama&#x27;s religion &#x22;positively Nixonian&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803050001</link>
<description>Discussing Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s answer to a question about whether she believed Sen. Barack Obama is a Muslim, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editor Howard Fineman said that Clinton&#x27;s answer was &#x22;positively Nixonian in its pauses and innuendos.&#x22; In fact, Clinton&#x27;s first three words in response to the question -- &#x22;You don&#x27;t believe that Senator Obama is a Muslim?&#x22; -- were, &#x22;Of course not&#x3C;em&#x3E;.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803050001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:19:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fineman falsely  asserted Obama &#x22;admitt[ed] he can&#x27;t manage his way out of a paper bag&#x22; during  Las Vegas  debate  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801160014</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; chief political correspondent Howard Fineman falsely claimed during MSNBC&#x27;s coverage following the January 15 Democratic presidential candidates debate in Las Vegas that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;admitt[ed] that he can&#x27;t manage his way out of a paper bag while he&#x27;s running for president of the United States.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801160014</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:34:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fineman&#x27;s  strawman: Dems advocate leaving Iraq  &#x22;overnight&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708270005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Countdown&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; chief political correspondent 
Howard Fineman asserted that &#x22;[t]he problem that the Democrats have got, indeed, that all America has got, is that having gone into Iraq the way we 
did, there is, in the opinion of many fair-minded observers, chaos and hell to pay if we 
get out overnight.&#x22; While Fineman did not specify which &#x22;Democrats&#x22; have 
advocated withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq &#x22;overnight,&#x22; Democrats support several plans that call for a &#x22;gradual&#x22; 
withdrawal or a &#x22;phased redeployment&#x22; of U.S. troops from Iraq, with some troops 
remaining in Iraq for specified missions after the withdrawal of most combat 
troops.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708270005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:55:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Once again,  Fineman looks at Republican failures and sees problems for ...  Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708060003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708060003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:30:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dowd one of many to run with portrayal of Clinton as violent</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706210011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706210011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:29:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fineman &#x22;can&#x27;t blame&#x22; McCain for angry outbursts because &#x22;his courage forever is being tested by his bad luck&#x22;  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705250005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705250005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:56:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fineman, Matthews mind meld: cite Dem satisfaction with candidates as harbinger of future Dem dissatisfaction</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705080010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Howard Fineman suggested that a recent poll
finding that 77 percent of Democrats and &#x22;Democrat Leaners&#x22; are
satisfied with their party&#x27;s choice of presidential nominees, while 52
percent of Republicans and &#x22;Republican Leaners&#x22; said the same, meant that &#x22;both
parties are going to nominate somebody that they&#x27;re sort of not wildly
enthusiastic about, and then there is going to be seven months ... for
everybody to have buyer&#x27;s remorse big time.&#x22; Chris Matthews asserted that the supposed dissatisfaction
could lead to a &#x22;third party&#x22; bid.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705080010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 May 2007 15:35:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fineman to pal Imus: Racist comments aren&#x27;t OK any more like they used to be</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704090002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704090002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Apr 2007 12:12:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who are Sen. Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;evil men&#x22;? Media mind-readers can&#x27;t agree</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:41:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media still &#x22;Say[ing] Anything&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701240001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701240001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:47:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media suggested conservative Christians are particularly outraged by Foley scandal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090008</link>
<description>In their coverage of the Foley scandal&#x27;s political effects, numerous media figures have suggested that conservative Christians are most likely to react negatively to the Foley scandal. In doing so, they presume that so-called &#x22;values voters&#x22; are more concerned than others with protecting children.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610090008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2006 18:37:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Chris Matthews Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E; panel ignored McCain&#x27;s inconsistencies on Bush&#x27;s Iraq policy</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608300002</link>
<description>On the August 27 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Chris Matthews Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, panelists Elisabeth Bumiller, Howard Fineman, and Michael Duffy failed to note Sen. John McCain&#x27;s history of conflicting statements on President Bush&#x27;s Iraq policy and on Donald Rumsfeld&#x27;s performance as secretary of defense.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608300002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:11:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite GOP attacks, Hotline&#x27;s Todd claimed that Republicans invoked national security &#x22;in a positive&#x22; way in &#x27;02 and &#x27;04</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608100010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Chuck Todd, editor in chief of the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s weblog The Hotline, asserted that Republicans had invoked the issue of national security &#x22;in a positive [way]&#x22; in the 2002 and 2004 elections. In fact, Republicans launched numerous attacks on Democrats such as former Sen. Max Cleland in 2002 and Sen. John Kerry in 2004.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608100010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:09:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media outlets suggested Sen. Clinton&#x27;s critique of Rumsfeld was motivated purely by politics</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608060001</link>
<description>Several news outlets portrayed Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s harsh criticism of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld as a purely political maneuver to &#x22;find the exact middle&#x22; in the Democratic Party or to position herself for a potential 2008 presidential run.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608060001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Aug 2006 11:50:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Chris Matthews Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E; panel agreed Sen. Clinton is not an &#x22;authentic person&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607310002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Chris Matthews Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CBS News contributor and &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E; contributing editor Gloria Borger stated that former Sen. John Edwards might be able to defeat Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination because &#x22;he&#x27;s a more authentic person than Hillary Clinton.&#x22; Borger&#x27;s comment met with agreement from the panel.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607310002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:39:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>