<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - James Taranto</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/james_taranto</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: James Taranto</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Worst  of the Web Today: Taranto  ignored  Bush attacks in &#x27;99, claiming he &#x22;for  the most part ignored&#x22; Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708160008</link>
<description>OpinionJournal.com editor James Taranto claimed that &#x22;[e]ight years ago,&#x22; 
then-presidential candidate George W. Bush &#x22;understood that he was not running 
against Bill Clinton and for the most part ignored him.&#x22; In fact, Bush 
repeatedly attacked the Clinton administration throughout 
1999.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708160008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:30:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media trot out  gender stereotypes in discussion of Elizabeth Edwards&#x27; comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707190001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707190001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:04:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN alleged &#x22;creative math&#x22; in Obama&#x27;s fundraising before debunking the allegation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707180004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707180004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:40:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, conservative media asserted that Lieberman ran as staunch war supporter, ignored his shifting rhetoric</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611130009</link>
<description>Following the midterm elections, prominent
Republicans and conservative media figures, as well as &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, dismissed suggestions
that the results represented a referendum on Iraq
by noting that Connecticut
voters re-elected Sen. Joe Lieberman, despite his support for the war. But
these attempts to cast Lieberman&#x27;s victory as a counter to claims that
the outcome of the elections was a repudiation of Bush&#x27;s Iraq policy
overlook Lieberman&#x27;s efforts in
the weeks leading up to the election to
portray himself as a critic of the war.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611130009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:38:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Worst of the Web Today: Taranto cited 1998 bin Laden PDB as evidence of Pres. Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;inaction&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609280001</link>
<description>OpinionJournal.com editor James Taranto cited a 1998 memo to then-President Bill Clinton titled &#x22;Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks&#x22; to claim that Clinton ignored evidence of the danger Al Qaeda posed to the United States. However, the 9-11 Commission detailed an immediate and aggressive response to the memo by the Clinton administration.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609280001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:31:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Worst of the Web Today: Taranto made light of Sheehan&#x27;s surgery</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608240010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:41:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Taranto conspicuously mum on the status of his media-bias theory</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606020006</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; OpinionJournal.com editor James Taranto has yet to acknowledge that his theory of media bias -- that &#x22;the mainstream media ... are generally biased in favor of liberals and Democrats, but this ends up helping conservatives and Republicans by breeding complacency on the Democratic side&#x22; -- did not pass his own test. In a May 30 column, Taranto challenged readers to find an article from 1994 or 1980 &#x22;speculating about the possibility of a Republican landslide.&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; answered Taranto&#x27;s challenge by presenting eight articles from 1994 that met his criteria. Since then, Taranto has twice addressed &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; response but has ignored the fact his theory of media bias failed his test.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606020006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jun 2006 13:22:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>At Taranto&#x27;s request, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; debunks his theory of media bias</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605310001</link>
<description>James Taranto issued a challenge to test his theory that the &#x22;mainstream media&#x22; are &#x22;generally biased in favor of liberals and Democrats, but this ends up helping conservatives and Republicans by breeding complacency on the Democratic side.&#x22; Taranto asked: &#x22;Can you find a similar article ... speculating about the possibility of a Republican landslide in 1994, when there actually was one?&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; answers Taranto&#x27;s challenge.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605310001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 09:47:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Worst of the Web Today: Taranto attacked Democrats and the media -- but not Bush -- for politicizing Tal Afar</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605110015</link>
<description>James Taranto attacked Bloomberg News for its article about a suicide bombing in the Iraqi city of Tal Afar that also mentioned President Bush&#x27;s record-low job approval rating of 31 percent. Taranto went on to attack &#x22;the media and the Democratic Party&#x22; and praised the Bush administration for &#x22;dealing with&#x22; Iraq as &#x22;a real problem, not merely a political one.&#x22; However, Taranto did not mention that it was Bush who politicized Tal Afar to begin with -- hyping the city as an Iraq success story despite Tal Afar&#x27;s rising sectarian conflict.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605110015</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 17:46:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Taranto responds to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- and is still wrong</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603130014</link>
<description>James Taranto once again misrepresented &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s position, this time in response to an item noting his false characterization of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; coverage of Rep. John Murtha&#x27;s call for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603130014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:29:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Worst of the Web Today: Taranto distorted &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Murtha coverage</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603100012</link>
<description>James Taranto falsely claimed that &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;cheered&#x22; Rep. John Murtha&#x27;s call for the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq but also &#x22;denied that he had done any such thing.&#x22; In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; neither endorsed nor condemned Murtha&#x27;s proposal, nor did we deny Murtha called for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; instead corrected those in the media who falsely claimed that Murtha called for an &#x22;immediate withdrawal&#x22; or who falsely referred to Rep. Duncan Hunter&#x27;s one-sentence resolution calling for immediate withdrawal as the &#x22;Murtha amendment.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603100012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:47:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media accused liberals of politicizing King funeral, ignored conservatives&#x27; use of Reagan funeral</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090007</link>
<description>Numerous media figures highlighted the alleged &#x22;partisan&#x22; nature of Coretta Scott King&#x27;s funeral but failed to comment on the politicization of Ronald Reagan&#x27;s funeral.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:01:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>