<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Jeff Greenfield</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/jeff_greenfield</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Jeff Greenfield</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Asserting that Obama &#x22;wants to talk to&#x22; Iran, CBS&#x27; Greenfield did not mention that Gates also advocates talking to Iran  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805160009</link>
<description>While discussing President Bush&#x27;s speech to the Israeli Knesset, in which Bush stated that &#x22;some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals,&#x22; Jeff Greenfield stated that &#x22;the number one fear in Israel and among some American Jews is Iran -- that&#x27;s who Obama wants to talk to.&#x22; However, Greenfield did not note that Defense Secretary Robert Gates reportedly stated that the United States should &#x22;sit down and talk with&#x22; Iran.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805160009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:35:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Uncritically airing Giuliani&#x27;s attack, media ignored context of Clinton&#x27;s remarks on taxes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705210001</link>
<description>In reporting on Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s Republican
debate performance, several media outlets uncritically repeated his attack on
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, that &#x22;with regard to taxes,&#x22; she
&#x22;said ... that we have to take money from you in order to give it to
the common good.&#x22; But these outlets did not provide any context for Clinton&#x27;s
remarks, which she reportedly made at a fundraiser in front of an audience that
consisted of people she described as &#x22;well enough off that ... the
[Bush administration] tax cuts may have helped&#x22; them.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705210001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 12:10:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Greenfield and now Matalin defend Obama-Middle East references as a joke</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612150011</link>
<description>Mary Matalin said discussion
about Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s middle name, Hussein, is &#x22;really about
nothing&#x22; and responded that co-host Alan Colmes should &#x22;get a sense
of humor&#x22; after Colmes requested that Matalin ask her &#x22;conservative
friends to drop the &#x27;Hussein.&#x27; &#x22; CNN&#x27;s Jeff Greenfield
had similarly
claimed that he was joking when he likened the style of Obama&#x27;s clothing
to that of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612150011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:01:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media uncritically aired false and misleading ads attacking Sen. Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608180003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:10:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>After repeatedly reporting Democrats lacked plan, CNN ignored party&#x27;s new national security strategy</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603300007</link>
<description>Over the past year, CNN hosts, anchors, and reporters have repeatedly commented on the Democratic Party&#x27;s purported lack of a clear plan or concrete set of alternatives on issues ranging from Social Security to the war in Iraq. When a large coalition of Democrats stood together on March 29 to unveil a unified national security platform, CNN largely ignored the news.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603300007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:54:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media accused liberals of politicizing King funeral, ignored conservatives&#x27; use of Reagan funeral</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090007</link>
<description>Numerous media figures highlighted the alleged &#x22;partisan&#x22; nature of Coretta Scott King&#x27;s funeral but failed to comment on the politicization of Ronald Reagan&#x27;s funeral.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602090007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2006 16:01:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Greenfield chided Rep. Wexler for rebutting SOTU address before Bush delivered it, ignoring White House advance release of speech excerpts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602010011</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Jeff Greenfield chided Rep. Robert Wexler for releasing a rebuttal of President Bush&#x27;s State of the Union address without actually seeing the speech. But as it has in past years, the White House made excerpts of the speech available well before it was delivered, leaving Wexler ample time to read the excerpts before issuing his response.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602010011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:21:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media uncritically cast Bush&#x27;s defense of spy program as &#x22;strong&#x22; and &#x22;vigorous&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602010007</link>
<description>Following President Bush&#x27;s State of the Union address, various media figures described his defense of domestic eavesdropping as &#x22;strong,&#x22; &#x22;vigorous,&#x22; and &#x22;fierce.&#x22; But they failed to note the numerous inaccuracies Bush employed in justifying the surveillance program, whose legality has been challenged not just by Democrats, but by Republicans and some prominent conservative legal scholars as well.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602010007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:01:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Greenfield falsely suggested &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; is &#x22;extremely angry&#x22; at Democrats for not filibustering Alito</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601260011</link>
<description>CNN senior analyst Jeff Greenfield falsely suggested that &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;ha[s] been extremely angry&#x22; at Senate Democrats for being unwilling to pursue a filibuster against Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr. In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; is &#x22;dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media&#x22; and has not taken a position on whether Alito should be confirmed or on whether senators should filibuster his nomination.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601260011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:31:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Greenfield repeated Gillespie&#x27;s false claim that Roberts didn&#x27;t refer to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; as &#x22;settled law&#x22; in his Supreme Court hearing</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200601110006</link>
<description>In an interview with CNN&#x27;s Wolf Blitzer, CNN senior analyst Jeff Greenfield repeated a false claim by former Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie that John Roberts &#x22;never said&#x22; that &#x3C;em&#x3E;Roe v. Wade&#x3C;/em&#x3E; was &#x22;settled law&#x22; during his Supreme Court nomination hearings. Blitzer failed to challenge or correct this false statement.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200601110006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:01:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>