<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Jim Angle</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/jim_angle</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Jim Angle</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Angle uncritically reported Hatch&#x27;s remarks downplaying reach of government&#x27;s warrantless eavesdropping program </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807100011</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle reported that during debate on the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, &#x22;Senator Orrin Hatch dismissed the idea that the intelligence agencies were trying to listen to anyone other than those with terrorist connections&#x22; and aired a clip of Hatch stating, &#x22;I don&#x27;t want to bruise anyone&#x27;s ego, but if Al Qaeda is not on your speed dial, the government is probably not interested in you.&#x22; Angle did not note that several news articles have reported that surveillance under the government&#x27;s warrantless eavesdropping program was not limited to those with &#x22;Al Qaeda on [their] speed dial,&#x22; but also included thousands of Americans with no ties to any terrorist group.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807100011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:57:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Discussing  proposed immunity, Angle omitted judge&#x27;s finding that no &#x22;reasonable entity&#x22;  could think actions urged by Bush admin. were legal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190004</link>
<description>In describing the Senate debate over granting retroactive legal immunity to 
telecommunications companies that allegedly cooperated with the government&#x27;s 
program of warrantless domestic eavesdropping, Fox News&#x27; Jim Angle stated that 
the debate &#x22;is over whether or not to give immunity to the telecom companies who 
were told by the administration that they were acting lawfully and asked their 
cooperation, and they gave it.&#x22; But Angle did not mention that, in a case 
challenging the legality of AT&#x26;amp;T&#x27;s alleged cooperation with the wiretapping 
program, a judge found that AT&#x26;amp;T &#x22;cannot seriously contend that a reasonable 
entity in its position could have believed&#x22; that it would be lawful for the 
company to cooperate with the government.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:08:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle falsely  claimed Dems&#x27; bill would be first to require a court order to intercept terrorism suspects&#x27; calls to  U.S.</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle 
falsely claimed that proposed revisions to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 
Act (FISA) would, for 
the first time, require 
the federal government to obtain a court order to intercept the communications 
of terrorism suspects 
abroad when they call the United States. Angle asserted that 
&#x22;even requiring warrants for terrorists calling the U.S. from abroad 
is a major departure, something the law has never required since it was passed 
some 30 years ago.&#x22; In 
fact, with few exceptions, FISA, as originally enacted in 1978, required the government to obtain a court order to 
conduct &#x22;electronic 
surveillance,&#x22; which FISA defines in part as 
&#x22;the acquisition by an electronic, mechanical, or other surveillance device of 
the contents of any wire communication to or from a person in the United States, 
without the consent of any party thereto, if such acquisition occurs in the 
United States.&#x22; It was only in 
August that Congress categorically excluded from the warrant 
requirement any 
&#x22;surveillance directed at a person reasonably believed to be located outside of 
the United 
States.&#x22; That exclusion is due to expire in 
February 2008.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710120010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:59:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Angle repeatedly  misrepresented Limbaugh&#x27;s and &#x22;critics&#x27;&#x22; comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle 
repeatedly misrepresented both Rush 
Limbaugh&#x27;s &#x22;phony 
soldiers&#x22; comment and the arguments of &#x22;Limbaugh&#x27;s critics,&#x22; 
falsely reinforcing Limbaugh&#x27;s claim that he was referring to actual military 
imposters, rather than service members or former service members with whom he 
disagrees.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:24:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox  News&#x27; Angle, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial misrepresented  upcoming  Iraq  report as &#x22;Petraeus&#x27; report&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170004</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; Jim Angle asserted that the upcoming report to Congress on the 
Iraq war will be &#x22;General David 
Petraeus&#x27; report.&#x22; In fact, the bill mandating the report requires 
that President Bush submit the report to Congress and that Petraeus 
&#x22;be 
made available to testify in open and closed sessions before the relevant 
committees of the Congress.&#x22; Similarly, a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial contradicted its 
own paper&#x27;s reporting in 
asserting that Petraeus is &#x22;expected to elaborate&#x22; on 
his claims 
of progress in 
Iraq &#x22;in a report to Congress in 
September.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708170004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:20:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Angle misrepresented NASA correction to claim 1934 is now &#x22;hottest year&#x22; on record</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708120001</link>
<description>On 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Angle 
reported that NASA was forced &#x22;to admit it was wrong when it said that 1998 was 
the hottest year on record&#x22; and that NASA &#x22;now says 1934 was the hottest year, 
followed by 1998, then 1921.&#x22; But Angle did 
not 
inform 
viewers that 
NASA&#x27;s revision affected annual temperature rankings for the United States 
only; it had no effect on the annual global temperature rankings.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708120001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:49:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle omitted question Mueller was asked, then asserted it was &#x22;unclear&#x22; whether he had contradicted Gonzales</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708020002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:20:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle&#x27;s report on  Gonzales hearing falsely identified Specter as a  Democrat</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:49:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Angle mischaracterized &#x3C;em&#x3E;Sun-Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; report, Obama land deal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704250011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:09:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Angle falsely suggested Kaine condemned Moran&#x27;s comments on gun control</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704200001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704200001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:00:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media failed to report Pelosi&#x27;s clarification of her message to Syria</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060015</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060015</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Apr 2007 19:10:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite evidence to the contrary, Angle claimed Pelosi didn&#x27;t press Syria on &#x22;serious issues&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704060012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:30:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters &#x3C;/em&#x3E;CIA leak case &#x22;dishonor&#x22; roll</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060017</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 18:18:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle baselessly claimed that Wilson told the CIA that Iraq &#x22;tried, but failed&#x22; to get uranium from Niger</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702090007</link>
<description>Jim Angle baselessly
claimed that Joe Wilson
had reported to the CIA
that &#x22;the Iraqis had indeed tried, but failed&#x22; to obtain uranium from Niger. According to a
CIA report, a former Nigerien prime minister had
&#x22;interpreted&#x22; an offer to meet with Iraqis on &#x22;expanding
commercial relations&#x22; to mean that &#x22;Iraq wanted to discuss uranium
yellowcake sales.&#x22; But the
report indicates only that Wilson told the CIA of the former prime minister&#x27;s
interpretation and provides no evidence that Wilson endorsed that view himself.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702090007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:31:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Angle left out Iraq troop increase&#x27;s apparent undermining of U.S. effort in Afghanistan</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701130002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701130002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:31:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>