<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Jobs/Wages/Unemployment</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/jobs_wages_unemployment</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Jobs/Wages/Unemployment</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; falsely asserted &#x22;occupation, experience, seniority, education and hours worked&#x22; are &#x22;ignored by those citing the wage gap&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807160011</link>
<description>In an editorial about the pay gap between male and female workers, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; falsely asserted that &#x22;the relevant factors that affect pay -- occupation, experience, seniority, education and hours worked -- are ignored by those citing the wage gap.&#x22; The editorial also asserted that &#x22;women tend to place a higher priority on flexibility and personal fulfillment&#x22; than on higher pay. In fact, a GAO study found that a pay gap persists even when controlling for work experience, seniority, education, industry, occupation, race, marital status, and job tenure.     </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807160011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:01:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Velshi falsely claimed Feb. unemployment rate dropped to &#x22;a historic low&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703090007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703090007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:19:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media allowed to stand suggestion that Pelosi support for minimum wage bill stems from company in her district</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230008</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701230008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:58:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck allowed misinformation on minimum wage hike</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701100009</link>
<description>On his CNN program, Glenn Beck allowed the Cato
Institute&#x27;s James Dorn to repeat a much-circulated myth that the minimum
wage increase proposal would benefit &#x22;typically your part-time ... young workers that
are making minimum wage,&#x22; adding that [m]ost of these workers are in
families that have incomes in the middle income or even higher middle-income
families.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701100009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:43:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lowry: Minimum wage hike will &#x22;give a small boost&#x22; to &#x22;teenagers working summers&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090006</link>
<description>In his latest column, Rich Lowry wrote that
&#x22;[t]he effect&#x22; of a Democratic proposal to raise the federal
minimum wage &#x22;basically will be to give a small boost to the wage
of teenagers working summers or after school.&#x22; In fact, the Economic Policy
Institute found that 71 percent of those who would be &#x22;directly
affected&#x22; by the Democratic minimum-wage proposal are age 20 or over.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:39:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; headline falsely claimed Bush &#x22;[s]upports Democrats&#x27; &#x22; minimum wage proposal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612210004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612210004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:19:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Will falsely suggested most employees affected by Dems&#x27; proposed minimum-wage increase are &#x22;students and other part-time workers&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611210006</link>
<description>George F. Will falsely suggested
that most employees who would benefit from a Democratic proposal to raise the
federal minimum wage to $7.25 an hour are &#x22;students and other part-time
workers.&#x22; In fact, a majority of those who would be affected by the
Democratic minimum-wage proposal are full-time workers.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611210006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:21:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Harris gushed over new economic figures as &#x22;Christmas com[ing] early for congressional Republicans,&#x22; ignored their downside</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611030014</link>
<description>During an interview with White
House counselor Dan Bartlett, CNN&#x27;s Tony Harris touted newly released
unemployment figures while ignoring the negative news -- that the job creation
rate for the month of October fell well short of expectations. Harris also
failed to challenge Bartlett&#x27;s
claims that Democrats would raise taxes if they win control of Congress; that
the wealthy &#x22;are paying more as a percentage of taxes than they did
before the tax relief&#x22;; and that Democrats must raise taxes because
&#x22;it&#x27;s fundamentally within their DNA to spend money.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611030014</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:55:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Big Story&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Your World&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reports accepted Bush administration&#x27;s misleading wage and jobs claims</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250019</link>
<description>MSNBC and Fox News uncritically reported claims by the Bush administration, including that &#x22;wages for the average middle-class American today are actually higher than they were just a couple of years ago,&#x22; ignoring a report alleging that the median hourly real wage has &#x22;declined 2 percent since 2003.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250019</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:05:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Barnes baselessly cited opposition to &#x22;hiking the minimum wage&#x22; as evidence of Democratic partisanship</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608150003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Beltway Boys&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Fred Barnes baselessly asserted that congressional Democrats opposed a bill that would have increased the minimum wage because &#x22;Democrats have decided, &#x27;We&#x27;re not going to help Republicans on anything. ... We&#x27;re going to object to it ... even when they&#x27;re offering us things like hiking the minimum wage that we like.&#x27; &#x22; Barnes did not mention that House Republicans tied the wage increase to a bill that would cut the estate tax, a proposal Democrats vehemently opposed for providing a disproportionate benefit to the wealthiest Americans.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608150003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:49:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Olbermann named Coulter &#x22;Worst Person,&#x22; asking &#x22;why she has not been banned&#x22; from MSNBC; Boortz awarded third</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070001</link>
<description>On MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Countdown&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Keith Olbermann named Ann Coulter &#x22;Worst Person in the World&#x22; for suggesting in a column that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is a closeted lesbian. During the segment, Olbermann also awarded Neal Boortz third place for falsely stating that most workers on minimum wage are teenagers and for calling adult minimum-wage workers &#x22;pathetic&#x22; and &#x22;worthless.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:41:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boortz read &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reader comments aloud while again smearing adult minimum-wage earners</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608050001</link>
<description>On his radio show, before reading comments from a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; item that documented his August 3 remarks describing adult minimum-wage earners as &#x22;incompetent,&#x22; &#x22;ignorant,&#x22; &#x22;stupid,&#x22; &#x22;worthless,&#x22; and &#x22;pathetic,&#x22; Neal Boortz again smeared them, calling adult minimum-wage earners &#x22;100 percent pure unadulterated loser[s].&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608050001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Aug 2006 20:18:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; advanced misleading arguments against minimum-wage boost, obscured Democratic support for wage increase</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030008</link>
<description>ABC White House correspondent Jake Tapper and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; staff writer Jeffrey Birnbaum both uncritically reported conservatives&#x27; argument that a minimum-wage increase will eliminate existing jobs and discourage the creation of new ones. However, several studies show that minimum-wage increases do not hurt employment.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:30:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boortz: Adults earning minimum wage are &#x22;incompetent&#x22;, &#x22;ignorant&#x22;, &#x22;stupid&#x22;, &#x22;worthless,&#x22; and &#x22;pathetic&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030007</link>
<description>Neal Boortz asked his audience, &#x22;[H]ow incompetent, how ignorant, how worthless is an adult that can&#x27;t earn more than the minimum wage?&#x22; Boortz also falsely claimed that &#x22;most of the people that earn [the] minimum wage are teenagers.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608030007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Aug 2006 17:30:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; obscured Democratic support for minimum wage increase, uncritically repeated anti-wage increase argument</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607280006</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; credited GOP &#x22;moderates&#x22; with forcing the Republican leadership to allow a vote on increasing the minumum wage, burying the fact that Democrats have been pushing for years to increase the minimum wage. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; also uncritically repeated the argument, often put forth by opponents of a wage increase, that a higher minimum wage will result in job losses and discourage job creation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607280006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:55:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>