<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - John Fund</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/john_fund</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: John Fund</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Recycling misinformation, &#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Fund accused Gore of &#x22;environmental exaggerations and hypocrisy&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703200003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703200003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:39:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On MSNBC, Fund falsely claimed &#x22;Bush&#x27;s ratings are up&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610050017</link>
<description>John Fund disputed the assertion of a correlation between &#x22;the approval ratings of [President] Bush [and] the ratings of Fox News&#x22; by baselessly claiming that &#x22;Bush&#x27;s ratings are up, and Fox [News]&#x27;s ratings are down.&#x22; In fact, while Fox News ratings are indeed down, so are President Bush&#x27;s.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610050017</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:22:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On MSBNC, Fund falsely suggested British, French, and German &#x22;intelligence agencies all agree[d]&#x22; that &#x22;Saddam Hussein was involved with 9-11&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609130005</link>
<description>On MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist John Fund falsely suggested that &#x22;the British, the French, the German, and the American intelligence agencies all agree[d]&#x22; that Saddam Hussein was involved in the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks; in fact, according to various news reports, British, French, and German intelligence all agreed that there was &#x3C;em&#x3E;no link&#x3C;/em&#x3E; between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609130005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:37:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Fund claimed Berger and Albright &#x22;persuaded ABC to alter scenes involving them&#x22; -- but central falsehoods remain</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120001</link>
<description>Columnist John Fund claimed that Sandy Berger and Madeleine Albright &#x22;persuaded ABC to alter the scenes involving them&#x22; in the miniseries &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Path to 9/11&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. But while the scenes were apparently edited from earlier versions, both still presented depictions contradicted by both Clinton officials and the 9-11 Commission report.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609120001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:10:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Fund falsely claimed there are &#x22;about 16,000&#x22; U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, challenged Mark Green to &#x22;[l]ook it up&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608160004</link>
<description>On MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist John Fund falsely asserted that the United States has maintained &#x22;the same number of troops&#x22; in Saudi Arabia &#x22;that we had five years ago, about 16,000.&#x22; In fact, the State Department reported that the United States withdrew its troops stationed in Saudi Arabia after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and a July report by the Congressional Research Service stated that about 300 U.S. military personnel remain there. Moreover, five years ago, there were reportedly about 5,000 troops in Saudi Arabia.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608160004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:21:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fund, Krauthammer overstated capabilities of missile defense system</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606260009</link>
<description>Charles Krauthammer dubiously suggested that the United States had successfully completed &#x22;seven out of eight&#x22; tests of a missile defense system capable of intercepting the intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) North Korea is reportedly preparing to test-fire. But the system Krauthammer specifically referred to is not designed to intercept ICBMs. Additionally, John Fund dubiously claimed that if North Korea test-fires its ICBM, the United States has &#x22;a better than 50-50 chance&#x22; of shooting it down; in fact, the system Fund was apparently alluding to has been tested only under highly artificial conditions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606260009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:00:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Fund claimed that economic -- not religious -- conservatives sank Miers nomination</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603220002</link>
<description>On CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Lou Dobbs Tonight&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, CNN senior legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin asserted that &#x22;social, largely religious conservatives&#x22; forced the withdrawal of Harriet Miers&#x27;s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist John Fund responded to Toobin by naming two conservative religious leaders who had been Miers&#x27;s &#x22;biggest backers&#x22; and claiming, &#x22;It was economic conservatives, including &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, that were skeptical&#x22; of her nomination. In fact, following the disclosure of a speech by Miers in which she said that &#x22;self-determination&#x22; should guide decisions about abortion and school prayer, numerous social conservative groups and leaders demanded that Miers&#x27;s nomination be withdrawn.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603220002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:48:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fund cryptically suggested that he &#x22;got a security briefing&#x22; on UAE anti-terror efforts that he &#x22;can&#x27;t talk about&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200602280005</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist John Fund stated that he &#x22;got a security briefing&#x22; on United Arab Emirates actions to assist U.S. anti-terror efforts but suggested he &#x22;can&#x27;t talk about&#x22; what he learned, leaving viewers to wonder what the &#x22;security briefing&#x22; consisted of, whether he was privy to classified information, and, if so, why.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200602280005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:35:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>