<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - John Harwood</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/john_harwood</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: John Harwood</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>  Harwood ignored his own paper&#x27;s reporting on Obama&#x27;s work as community organizer as Scarborough mocked community organizing  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807090007</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Joe Scarborough mocked Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s work as a community organizer, saying, &#x22;Most people are like, &#x27;what&#x27;s a -- what&#x27;s a -- get a job -- what&#x27;s a community organizer?&#x27; &#x22; and later asked &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; John Harwood, &#x22;What did you do when you were a young man, John Harwood? Were you a community organizer?&#x22; Rather than note that two days earlier, his own newspaper had published a front-page article providing details that answered Scarborough&#x27;s question about what Obama did as a community organizer, Hardwood responded that he &#x22;played Little League baseball&#x22; and &#x22;saw a Beatles concert.&#x22;   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807090007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jul 2008 17:30:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times, Wash. Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reported McCain&#x27;s plan for offshore drilling in response to gas prices, but not that it would have no impact for years  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806230006</link>
<description>In articles on Sen. John McCain&#x27;s reversal on offshore drilling, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that McCain &#x22;cast&#x22; his position &#x22;switch&#x22; as a &#x22;bold action in response to gasoline prices topping $4 a gallon,&#x22; while &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; suggested that McCain&#x27;s position is a response &#x22;to ease the crunch for consumers.&#x22; Neither article pointed out that the Department of Energy has determined that offshore drilling would not impact gas prices for many years.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806230006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:26:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNBC&#x27;s Harwood still referring to McCain as a &#x22;maverick&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090015</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Harwood once again described Sen. John McCain as a &#x22;maverick,&#x22; claiming that McCain&#x27;s criticism of the media is in part &#x22;a way for John McCain, who has been such a maverick, to try to unify the Republican Party.&#x22; Harwood has repeatedly referred to McCain as a &#x22;maverick&#x22; or having a &#x22;maverick brand.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090015</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:51:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing McCain, &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x27;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Harwood falsely suggested Obama and Clinton proposed &#x22;government-run health care&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090003</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; John Harwood wrote that Sen. John McCain &#x22;prevailed over a field of Republicans who almost unanimously shared his support for the Iraq war, embrace of President Bush&#x27;s tax cuts, skepticism toward government-run health care and opposition to abortion rights,&#x22; while Sen. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton &#x22;both staked out opposite ground from Mr. McCain.&#x22; But neither Obama nor Clinton has proposed &#x22;government-run health care&#x22;; the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has previously pointed out that McCain has &#x22;inaccurately described Obama&#x27;s and Clinton&#x27;s health care proposals&#x22; by likening them to &#x22;government-run health care systems.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806090003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:11:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Harwood again referred to McCain as a &#x22;maverick&#x22; who &#x22;voted against Bush&#x27;s tax cuts&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130011</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Harwood described Sen. John McCain as a &#x22;maverick&#x22; without noting any of the numerous actions McCain has taken that undermine that characterization. Harwood later asserted that McCain &#x22;voted against Bush&#x27;s tax cuts&#x22; without noting that McCain reversed his position on the tax cuts and now calls for making them permanent, or that he has since offered a different explanation about why he voted against them than he gave at the time.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805130011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:08:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Harwood touted McCain&#x27;s &#x22;brand&#x22; as a &#x22;maverick,&#x22; but didn&#x27;t note his own role in promoting it  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805010005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hardball&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Harwood stated: &#x22;John McCain&#x27;s brand ... has been pretty well-established since 2000. He&#x27;s likable. He&#x27;s a maverick. He&#x27;s a war hero. All of that redounds to his benefit.&#x22; But while citing McCain&#x27;s purported &#x22;brand&#x22; as a &#x22;maverick,&#x22; Harwood did not acknowledge his own role in promoting that &#x22;brand.&#x22; Nor did he point out any of McCain&#x27;s actions that challenge that &#x22;brand,&#x22; such as McCain&#x27;s rightward shift on high-profile issues such as immigration and taxes, and his growing list of falsehoods.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805010005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2008 15:34:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite noting &#x22;flak&#x22; McCain got &#x22;for sort of flip-flopping and trying to court the right,&#x22; John Harwood asserted that &#x22;maverick brand is intact&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804160010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, John Harwood asserted that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s speech on the economy &#x22;trying to go after ... corporate greed&#x22; demonstrated that his &#x22;maverick brand is intact,&#x22; and that &#x22;this is a guy who has established a brand for himself that has endured ... despite that phase in 2007 when he was getting a lot of flak for sort of flip-flopping and trying to court the right.&#x22; However, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that &#x22;tax cuts, mostly for corporations and wealthy individuals, remain the centerpiece of McCain&#x27;s economic agenda.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804160010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:08:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Some MSNBC journalists identify a media double standard in coverage of McCain gaffe; others demonstrate it  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200011</link>
<description>After Chuck Todd acknowledged a media double standard in coverage of Sen. John McCain&#x27;s Al Qaeda-Iran gaffe, CNBC&#x27;s John Harwood asserted on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;I think that at the end of the day, John McCain has got sufficient credibility on that issue that people are not going to look at that and say, &#x27;Oh, John McCain is confused&#x27; or &#x27;John McCain&#x27;s too old&#x27; or &#x27;John McCain doesn&#x27;t get it.&#x27; ... But he obviously can&#x27;t do that too many times or he&#x27;s got a problem.&#x22; Harwood was not alone in misrepresenting or excusing McCain&#x27;s false claim on MSNBC; several MSNBC reporters and anchors have ignored or excused McCain&#x27;s false claim.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803200011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:01:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews, Blitzer uncritically cited Giuliani ad without noting his use of &#x22;meaningless&#x22; stat, according to cancer expert</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710300008</link>
<description>Chris Matthews, Wolf Blitzer, and Chris Jansing each
uncritically aired or reported on a
Rudy Giuliani radio ad
in which Giuliani claims
that when he had prostate cancer, his &#x22;chance of surviving ... in the United States, 82
percent&#x22; but that his &#x22;chance of surviving prostate cancer in
England, only 44 percent under socialized medicine.&#x22; However, a post on washingtonpost.com&#x27;s Fact
Checker blog noted that &#x22;the survivability figures tell us little about
the differences in the quality of treatment received by prostate cancer
patients in the United States
and Britain&#x22;
and that &#x22;the two
countries are much closer&#x22; in terms of the &#x22;mortality rates from
the disease.&#x22; Neither Matthews nor Blitzer nor Jansing
noted Giuliani&#x27;s
use of &#x22;meaningless&#x22; -- according to a cancer research expert --
statistics.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710300008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:44:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russert, Harwood  did not challenge  Brody&#x27;s claim about  Dems and terrorism</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709110001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet The Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Christian 
Broadcasting Network&#x27;s 
David Brody asserted: &#x22;At the end of the day ... this issue [terrorism] 
helps the Republicans more than the Democrats because they&#x27;re going to be able 
to enforce this idea that the Democrats want to go at this with law enforcement 
and the Republicans 
don&#x27;t.&#x22; Neither Tim 
Russert nor his other guest, CNBC&#x27;s John Harwood, challenged Brody&#x27;s assertions; in fact, Democrats have offered&#x3C;strong&#x3E; &#x3C;/strong&#x3E;strategies for 
fighting both Al Qaeda in Iraq and the main Al Qaeda terrorist 
organization.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709110001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:56:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Defending Givhan&#x27;s cleavage coverage, Harwood asserted &#x22;calculati[ng]&#x22; Clinton knew &#x22;what she was communicating  by her dress&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707290003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707290003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:35:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On MSNBC, Harwood said Giuliani has &#x22;claim to combat&#x22; experience from 9-11</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705170005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705170005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:20:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media heaped praise on Huckabee&#x27;s &#x22;sexual dig&#x22; at Edwards</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160005</link>
<description>Media figures and outlets heaped praise on Mike
Huckabee&#x27;s comment, during the May 15 Republican presidential debate,
that &#x22;[w]e&#x27;ve had a Congress that&#x27;s spent money like John
Edwards at a beauty shop,&#x22; a reference to reports that former Sen. John
Edwards spent $800 of campaign money (which Edwards said was reimbursed) on two
haircuts. ABC News&#x27; The Note, as well as &#x3C;em&#x3E;The
Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen called the line an &#x22;instant
classic,&#x22; while &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s
Jonathan Martin predicted that it &#x22;will dominate the news coverage in the
days ahead.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705160005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:22:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring bipartisan criticism of administration, media warn that U.S. attorneys investigation could backfire on Democrats</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703260010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703260010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:54:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Uncritically echoing Specter, Harwood suggested Schumer has a conflict of interest on attorney issue</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703190010</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703190010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:55:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>